Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:29:24.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Echinoderms from the lower Silurian Brassfield Formation of east-central Kentucky

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2015

William I. Ausich ,
Mark E. Peter  and
Frank R. Ettensohn
William I. Ausich
Affiliation:
School of Earth Sciences, 155 South Oval Mall, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA, ;
Mark E. Peter
Affiliation:
School of Earth Sciences, 155 South Oval Mall, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA, ;
Frank R. Ettensohn
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new echinoderm fauna is reported from the Brassfield Formation (Rhuddanian, Silurian) of Bath County, Kentucky. The Brassfield Formation was the first extensive marine unit to be deposited following the end-Ordovician glaciation and extinctions and represents several shallow, open-marine facies. These facies supported a diverse pelmatozoan fauna. This report not only extends the geographic distribution of this fauna, but also the temporal range of the fauna back to Rhuddanian time. Six pelmatozoans are reported, including the crinoids Browerocrinus arthrikos n. gen. n. sp., Temnocrinus americanus n. sp., Stereoaster sp., and Dendrocrinus sp.; and the glyptocystitids Brockocystis nodosarius Foerste, 1919, and Anartiocystis whitei Sumrall, 2002. In addition, the asteroid Gordonaster brassfieldensis Blake and Ettensohn, 2009, was reported previously from this locality. Browerocrinus increases the diverse calceocrinid fauna from the Brassfield Formation; Temnocrinus was previously only known from the Homerian (Silurian) of England; and this is the first known occurrence of Stereoaster beyond the greater Dayton, Ohio, region. Furthermore, this is the first Brassfield locality known with two glyptocystitid taxa.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 89 , Issue 2 , March 2015 , pp. 245 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © 2015, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angelin, N.P., 1878, Iconographia Crinoideorum in stratis Sueciae Siluricis fossilium: Samson and Wallin, Holmiae, 62 p.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1984a, Calceocrinids from the early Silurian (Llandoverian) Brassfield Formation of southwestern Ohio: Journal of Paleontology, v. 58, p. 1167–1185.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1984b, The genus Clidochirus from the early Silurian of Ohio (Crinoidea, Llandoverian): Journal of Paleontology, v. 58, p. 1341–1346.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1985, New crinoids and revision of the superfamily Glyptocrinacea (early Silurian, Ohio): Journal of Paleontology, v. 59, p. 793–808.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1986a, New camerate crinoids of the suborder Glyptocrinina from the lower Silurian Brassfield Formation (southwestern Ohio): Journal of Paleontology, v. 60, p. 887–897.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1986b, Early Silurian inadunate crinoids (Brassfield Formation, Ohio): Journal of Paleontology, v. 60, p. 719–735.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1986c, Early Silurian rhodocrinitacean crinoids (Brassfield Formation, Ohio): Journal of Paleontology, v. 60, p. 84–106.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1986d, Palaeoecology and history of the Calceocrinidae (Palaeozoic Crinoidea): Palaeontology, v. 29, p. 85–99.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1987a, Brassfield Compsocrinina (early Silurian crinoids) from Ohio: Journal of Paleontology, v. 61, p. 552–562.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1987b, Revisions of Rowley’s Ordovician (?) and Silurian crinoids from Missouri: Journal of Paleontology, v. 61, p. 563–578.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1998, Phylogeny of Arenig to Caradoc crinoids (Phylum Echinodermata) and suprageneric classification of the Crinoidea: University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, new series, no. 9, 39 p.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Copper, P., 2010, The Crinoidea of Anticosti Island, Québec (late Ordovician to early Silurian): Palaeontographica Canadiana, no. 29, 157 p.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Deline, B., 2012, Macroevolutionary transition in crinoids following the late Ordovician extinction event (Ordovician to early Silurian): Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 361–362, p. 38–48, doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.07.022.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Dravage, P., 1988, Crinoids from the Brassfield Formation of Adams County, Ohio: Journal of Paleontology, v. 62, p. 285–289.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Schumacher, G.A., 1984, New lower Silurian rhombiferan cystoid (Echinodermata, Callocystitidae) from southwestern Ohio: Journal of Paleontology v. 58, p. 9–15.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., Kammer, T.W., and Baumiller, T.K., 1994, Demise of the middle Paleozoic crinoid fauna: a single extinction event or rapid faunal turnover?: Paleobiology, v. 20, p. 345–361.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., Brett, C.E., Hess, H., and Simms, M.J., 1999, Crinoid form and function, in Hess, H., Ausich, W.I., Brett, C.E., and Simms, M.J. Fossil Crinoids: Cambridge, U.K., Cambridge University Press, p. 3–30.Google Scholar
Bather, F.A., 1893, The Crinoidea of Gotland, Part 1, The Crinoidea Inadunata: Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar, v. 25, no. 2, 200 p.Google Scholar
Bather, F.A., 1899, A phylogenetic classification of the Pelmatozoa: British Association for the Advancement of Sciences, Report, 68th Meeting section D (Bristol, 1898), p. 916–923.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T.K., 1994, Patterns of dominance and extinction in the record of Paleozoic crinoids, in B. David, A. Guille, J.P. Féral, and M. Roux, eds., Echinoderms Through Time (Echinoderms Dijon): Rotterdam, A.A. Balkema, p. 193–198.Google Scholar
Bernard, F., 1895, Éléments de Paléontologie: Paris, J.B. Baillière and Fils, 612 p.Google Scholar
Blake, D.B., and Ettensohn, F.R., 2009, The complex morphology of a new lower Silurian asteroid (Echinodermata): Journal of Paleontology, v. 83, p. 63–69.Google Scholar
Boyarko, D., and Ausich, W.I., 2009, New calceocrinids from the Brassfield Formation of northern Kentucky and southern Ohio: Southeastern Geology, v. 46, p. 103–108.Google Scholar
Brett, C.E., 1981, Terminology and functional morphology of attachment structures in pelmatozoan echinoderms: Lethaia, v. 14, p. 343–370, doi: 10.1111/j.1502-3931.1981.tb01110.x.Google Scholar
Brett, C.E., Cramer, B.D., McLaughlin, P.I., Kleffner, M.A., Showers, W.J., and Thomka, J.R., 2012, Revised Telychian-Sheinwoodian (Silurian) stratigraphy of the Laurentian midcontinent: Building uniform nomenclature along the Cincinnati Arch: Bulletin of Geosciences, v. 87, p. 733–753, doi: 10.3140/bull.geosci.1310.Google Scholar
Broadhead, T.W., and Ettensohn, F.R., 1981, A new Brockocystis (Echinodermata: Rhombifera) from the lower Silurian (Llandovery) of Kentucky: Journal of Paleontology, v. 55, p. 773–779.Google Scholar
Brower, J.C., 1988, Ontogeny and phylogeny in primitive calceocrinid crinoids: Journal of Paleontology, v. 62, p. 917–934.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C., 1990, Ontogeny and phylogeny of the dorsal cup in calceocrinid crinoids: Journal of Paleontology, v. 64, p. 300–318.Google Scholar
Donovan, S.K., 1993, A Rhuddanian (Silurian, lower Llandovery) pelmatozoan fauna from south-west Wales: Geological Journal, v. 28, p. 1–19, doi: 10.1002/gj.3350280102.Google Scholar
Donovan, S.K., and Harper, D.A.T., 2003, Llandovery Crinoidea of the British Isles, including description of a new species from the Kilbride Formation (Telychian) of western Ireland: Geological Journal, v. 38, p. 85–97, doi: 10.1002/gj.934.Google Scholar
Donovan, S.K., and Lewis, D.N., 2005, Upper Llandovery (Telychian) crinoids (Echinodermata) of Devil’s Dingle, Buildwas, Shropshire: Geological Journal, v. 40, p. 343–350, doi: 10.1002/gj.1011.Google Scholar
Donovan, S. K., and Sevastopulo, G.D., 1989, Myelodactylid crinoids from the Silurian of the British Isles: Palaeontology, v. 32, p. 689–710.Google Scholar
Donovan, S.K., Lewis, D.N., Crabb, P., and Widdison, R.E., 2008, A field guide to the Silurian Echinodermata of the British Isles: Part 2 – Crinoidea, minor groups and discussion: Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, v. 57, p. 29–60.Google Scholar
Donovan, S. K., Lewis, D.N., Fearnhead, F.E., and Widdison, R.E., 2009, The British Silurian Crinoidea, Part 1, Introduction and Disparida: Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society, London, v. 163, n. 632, 51 p.Google Scholar
Donovan, S.K., Widdison, R.E., Lewis, D.N., and Fearnhead, F.E., 2010, The British Silurian Crinoidea, Part 2, addendum to part 1 and Cladida: Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society, London, v. 164, p. 47–133.Google Scholar
Donovan, S.K., Lewis, D.N., Fearnhead, F.E., and Widdison, R.E., 2012, The British Silurian Crinoidea, Part 3, addendum to parts 1 and 2, Camerata and columnals: Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society, London, v. 166, p. 135–259.Google Scholar
Eckert, J.D., 1984, Early Llandovery crinoids and stelleroids from the Cataract Group (lower Silurian), southern Ontario, Canada: Royal Ontario Museum Life Sciences, Contributions, v. 137, 83 p.Google Scholar
Eckert, J.D., 1990, The early Silurian myelodactylid crinoid Eomyelodactylus Foerste: Journal of Paleontology, v. 64, p. 135–141.Google Scholar
Eckert, J.D., and Brett, C.E., 2001, Early Silurian (Llandovery) crinoids from the Lower Clinton Group, western New York State: Bulletins of American Paleontology, v. 360, 88 p.Google Scholar
Ettensohn, F.R., Lierman, R.T., Mason, C.E., Andrews, W.M., Hendricks, R.T., Phelps, D.J., and Gordon, L.A., 2013, The Silurian of central Kentucky, U.S.A.: stratigraphy, palaeoenvironments and palaeoeocology: Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, v. 44, p. 159–189.Google Scholar
Fearnhead, F.E., 2009, Systematics and palaeobiology of the British Llandovery Crinoidea [Ph.D. thesis]: Birkbeck College, University of London, 307 p.Google Scholar
Fearnhead, F.E., and Donovan, S.K., 2007a, New crinoids (Echinodermata) from the Llandovery (Lower Silurian) of the British Isles: Palaeontology, v. 50, p. 905–915, doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00681.x.Google Scholar
Fearnhead, F.E., and Donovan, S.K., 2007b, A cladid crinoid (Echinodermata) from the Llandovery (lower Silurian) of the Girvan district, SW Scotland: Scottish Journal of Geology, v. 43, no. 1, p 180.Google Scholar
Fearnhead, F.E., and Donovan, S.K., 2007, A robust crinoid from the Llandovery (lower Silurian) of Norbury, Shropshire: systematics, palaeoecology and taphonomy: Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, v. 118, p. 339–345.Google Scholar
Fearnhead, F.E., and Harper, D.A.T., 2007, Petalocrinus (Echinodermata, Crinoidea) from the Llandovery (lower Silurian; Rhuddanian) of the Girvan District, SW Scotland: Scottish Journal of Geology, v. 43, p. 69–74.Google Scholar
Foerste, A.F., 1919, Echinodermata of the Brassfield (Silurian) Formation of Ohio: Bulletin of the Scientific Laboratories of Denison University, v. 19, p. 3–31.Google Scholar
Gordon, L.A., and Ettensohn, F.R., 1984, Stratigraphy, depositional environments, and regional dolomitization of the Brassfield Formation (Llandoverian) in east-central Kentucky: Southeastern Geology, v. 25, p. 101–115.Google Scholar
Hall, J., 1852, Palaeontology of New York, Containing descriptions of the organic remains of the lower middle division of the New-York system, Natural History of New York, 6. D: New York, Appleton and Co. and Wiley and Putnam and Boston, Gould, Kendall, & Lincoln, v. 2, 362 p.Google Scholar
Holland, C.H., 1971, Silurian faunal provinces?, in Middlemiss, F.A., Rawson, P.F., and Newell, G., eds., Faunal Provinces in Space and Time: Geological Journal Special Issue, v. 4, p. 61–76.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, P.I., Cramer, B.D., Brett, C.E., and Kleffner, M.A., 2008, Silurian high-resolution stratigraphy on the Cincinnati Arch: Progress on recalibrating the layer-cake, in A. H. Maria and R. C. Counts, eds., From the Cincinnati Arch to the Illinois Basin: Geological field excursions along the Ohio River valley: Geological Society of America Field Guide, 12, p. 119–180.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A.H., 1869, Descriptions of new Crinoidea and Echinoidea, from the Carboniferous rocks of the western states, with a note on the genus Onychaster: Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Proceedings, v. 21, p. 67–83.Google Scholar
Miller, J.S., 1821, A Natural History of the Crinoidea or lily-shaped animals, with observations on the genera Asteria, Euryale, Comatula, and Marsupites: Bristol, C. Frost, 150 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R.C., 1962, Revision of Calceocrinidae: University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Echinodermata, Article 4, 40 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R.C., and Laudon, L.R., 1943, Evolution and classification of Paleozoic crinoids: Geological Society of America Special Papers, v. 46, 153 p.Google Scholar
Paul, C.R.C., and Donovan, S.K., 2011, A review of the British Silurian cystoids: Geological Journal, v. 46, p. 434–450, 10.1002/gj.1287.Google Scholar
Peters, S.E., and Ausich, W.I., 2008, A sampling-adjusted macroevolutionary history for Ordovician-Silurian crinoids: Paleobiology, v. 34, no. 1, p. 104–116.Google Scholar
Ramsbottom, W.H.C., 1953, The British Lower Palaeozoic Crinoidea [Ph.D. thesis]: University of London, 290 p.Google Scholar
Rexroad, C.B., 1967, Stratigraphy and conodont paleontology of the Brassfield (Silurian) in the Cincinnati Arch area: Indiana Geological Survey Bulletin, v. 33, 64 p.Google Scholar
Rexroad, C.B., Branson, E.R., Smith, M.O., Summerson, C., and Boucot, A.J., 1965, The Silurian formations of east-central Kentucky and adjacent Ohio: Kentucky Geological Survey Bulletin, v. 2, Series 10, 34 p.Google Scholar
Rexroad, C.B., and Kleffner, M.A., 1984, The Silurian stratigraphy of east-central Kentucky and adjacent Ohio, in Rast, N. and Hays, H.B., eds., Field trip guides for the Geological Society of America Annual Meeting. Southeastern and North-Central Sections: Department of Geology and Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky, Lexington, p. 44–65.Google Scholar
Roemer, C.F., 1852–54, Erste Periode, Kohlen-Gebirge, in Bronn, H.G., Lethaea Geognostica, 1851–1856, (third edition): Stuttgart, E. Schweizerbart, v. 2, p. 210–291.Google Scholar
Sevastopulo, G.D., Ausich, W.I., and Franzén-Bengtson, C., 1989, Echinoderms, in Holland, C.H., and Bassett, M.G., eds., A Global Standard for the Silurian Series: Cardiff, National Museum of Wales, p. 264–267.Google Scholar
Schneider, K.A., and Ausich, W.I., 2002, Paleoecology of framebuilders in early Silurian reefs (Brassfield Formation, southwestern Ohio): Palaios, v. 17, p. 237–248, doi: 10.1669/0883-1351(2002)017<0237:POFIES>2.0.CO;2.Google Scholar
Sheehy, T.J., 1981, Carbonate Petrology of Carbonate Buildups in the Brassfield Formation near Fairborn, Ohio [M.S. Thesis]: Dayton, Ohio, Wright State University, 52 p.Google Scholar
Springer, F., 1902, On the crinoid genera Sagenocrinus, Forbesiocrinus, and allied forms: American Geologist, v. 30, p. 88–97.Google Scholar
Springer, F., 1913, Crinoidea, in von Zittel, K.A. Text-book of Paleontology, translated and edited by C. R. Eastman. 2nd edition: London, Macmillan and Co., Ltd., 1, p. 173–243.Google Scholar
Springer, F., 1920, The Crinoidea Flexibilia: Smithsonian Institution Publication, v. 2501, 486 p.Google Scholar
Springer, F., 1926, American Silurian Crinoids: Smithsonian Institution Publication, v. 2872, 239 p.Google Scholar
Sumrall, C.D., 2002, A new species of Anartiocystis (Callocystitidae, Glyptocystitida) from the Brassfield Formation of central Kentucky: Journal of Paleontology, v. 76, p. 918–920.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G., 1953, Classe des Crinoides, in Piveteau, J., ed., Traité de Paleontology: Paris, Masson and Cie, v. 3, p. 658–773.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G., 1978, General morphology, in Moore, R.C., and Teichert, C., eds., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Pt T. Echinodermata 2: Boulder and Lawrence, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas; p. T58–T216.Google Scholar
von Zittel, K.A., 1895, Grundzüge der Palaeontologie (Palaeozoologie), 1st edition, R.: Oldenbourg, München, 971 p.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F., 1880–1886, Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Pt. I. The families Ichthyocrinidae and Cyathocrinidae (1880), p. 226–378 (separate repaged p. 1–153). Pt. II. Family Sphaeroidocrinidae, with the sub-families Platycrinidae, Rhodocrinidae, and Actinocrinidae (1881), p. 177–411, (separate repaged, p. 1–237). Pt. III, Sec. 1. Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions (1885), p. 225–364 (separate repaged, 1–138). Pt. III, Sec. 2. Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions (1886), p. 64–226 (separate repaged to continue with section 1, 139–302).Google Scholar
Webster, G.D., 2003, Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, coronates, and hemistreptocrinoids: Geological Society of America Special Paper 363.Google Scholar
Webster, G.D., and Maples, C.G., 2008, Cladid crinoid radial facets, brachials, and arm appendages: A terminology solution for studies of lineage, classification, and paleoenvironment, in W.I. Ausich and G.D. Webster, eds., Echinoderm Paleobiology: Bloomington, Indiana University Press, p. 197–226.Google Scholar
Witzke, B.J., and Strimple, H.L., 1981, Early Silurian crinoids of eastern Iowa: Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, v. 88, p. 101–137.Google Scholar