Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:05:16.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Burrow distribution of thalassinidean shrimp on a Fraser Delta tidal flat, British Columbia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

David D. Swinbanks  and
John L. Luternauer
David D. Swinbanks
Affiliation:
Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo, 1-15-1 Minamidai, Nakano-ku, Tokyo 164, Japan
John L. Luternauer
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Canada, Pacific Geoscience Centre, 9860 West Saanich Rd., Sidney, B.C. V8L 4B2, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Burrows of the thalassinidean shrimp Callianassa californiensis and Upogebia pugettensis, which resemble the trace fossils Thalassinoides and Ophiomorpha, respectively, occur on the southern tidal flats at the western front of the Fraser Delta. Burrow densities for both shrimp species are highest at lower intertidal levels immediately inshore of an extensive bed of Zostera marina eelgrass, but the high-density shrimp populations are segregated: the highest densities of C. californiensis burrows (350–450 burrow openings/m2) occur in a strip of clean sandy sediments, whereas U. pugettensis burrows are most abundant (30–80 burrow openings/m2) in a patch of muddy sands and sandy muds. On the tidal flats of the Fraser Delta as a whole, however, textural properties of the sediment show no consistent correlation with the burrow density of either shrimp.

In the eelgrass bed, eelgrass root mats appear to markedly restrict the density of C. californiensis burrows. Towards the shore, the well-lined dwelling burrows of U. pugettensis occur no higher than mean sea level where maximum continuous exposure is ≤0.5 days. In contrast, C. californiensis, which has an unlined feeding burrow and a higher tolerance for anoxia, is present up to the margin of the local salt marsh which lies near the mean higher high water level where the flats can be exposed continuously up to 5 days.

In situ experiments indicate that C. californiensis extrudes 18 ± 9 ml of wet sediment/shrimp/ day onto the substrate surface, while U. pugettensis seldom forms a mound around its burrow entrance. Burial of filter-feeding postlarval U. pugettensis under the mounds produced by C. californiensis may increase postlarval mortality and reduce adult populations of U. pugettensis in areas of high C. californiensis burrow density.

The results of this study suggest that in distinguishing Ophiomorpha from Thalassinoides more emphasis should be placed on the presence of an extensive burrow lining in Ophiomorpha than on the presence of a knobby burrow exterior, because the former characteristic has a more profound bearing on burrow function, physiology of the occupant organism, and, consequently, burrow distribution.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , March 1987 , pp. 315 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aller, R. C. and Dodge, R. E. 1974. Animal-sediment relations in a tropical lagoon, Discovery Bay, Jamaica. Journal of Marine Research, 32:209–232.Google Scholar
Brenchley, G. A. 1981. Disturbance and community structure: an experimental study of bioturbation in marine soft-bottom environments. Journal of Marine Research, 39:767–790.Google Scholar
Brenchley, G. A. 1982. Mechanisms of spatial competition in marine soft-bottom communities. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 60:17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, R. G. and Frey, R. W. 1974. Redescription of the trace fossil Gyrolithes and taxonomic evaluation of Thalassinoides, Ophiomorpha and Spongeliomorpha. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 23:311–335.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, C. K. and Baier, J. L. 1973. Ophiomorpha and a new thalassinid burrow from the Permian of Utah. Geological Studies, Brig-ham Young University, 20:79–94Google Scholar
Dewindt, J. T. 1974. Callianassid burrows as indicators of subsurface beach trend, Mississippi River Delta Plain. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 44:1136–1139.Google Scholar
Dworschak, P. C. 1981. The pumping rates of the burrowing shrimp Upogebia pusilla (Petagna) (Decapoda: Thalassinidea). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 52:25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworschak, P. C. 1983. The biology of Upogebia pusilla (Petagna) (Decapoda: Thalassinidea). 1. The burrows. Marine Ecology, 4:19–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekdale, A. A., Bromley, R. G. and Pemberton, S. G. 1984. Ichnology: Trace Fossils in Sedimentology and Stratigraphy. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Short Course Notes, 15, 317 p.Google Scholar
Frey, R. W. and Howard, J. D. 1975. Endobenthic adaptions of juvenile thalassinidean shrimp. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 24:283–297.Google Scholar
Frey, R. W., Howard, J. D. and Pryor, W. A. 1978. Ophiomorpha: its morphologic, taxonomic, and environmental significance. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 23:199–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fürisch, F. T. 1973. A revision of the trace fossils Spongeliomorpha, Ophiomorpha and Thalassinoides. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Monatsch., 12:719–735Google Scholar
Fürisch, F. T. 1981. Invertebrate trace fossils from the Upper Jurassic of Portugal. Comunicacoes dos Servicos Geologicos de Portugal, 67:153–168.Google Scholar
Hoyt, J. H. 1967. Intercontinental correlation of late Pleistocene sea levels. Nature, 215:612–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGinitie, G. E. 1930. The natural history of the mud shrimp Upogebia pugettensis (Dana). Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 10, 6:36–44.Google Scholar
MacGinitie, G. E. 1934. The natural history of Callianassa californiensis Dana. American Midland Naturalist, 15:166–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangum, C. P. and Van Winkle, W. 1973. Response of aquatic invertebrates to declining oxygen conditions. American Zoologist, 13:529–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M. F. 1984. Bioturbation of intertidal quartz-rich sands: a modern example and its sedimentologic and paleoecologic implications. Journal of Geology, 92:201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, A. C. 1977. Sediment processing in a marine subtidal sandy bottom community: II. Biological consequences. Journal of Marine Research, 35:633–647.Google Scholar
Pearse, A. S. 1945. Ecology of Upogebia affinis (Say). Ecology, 26:303–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pemberton, G. S., Risk, M. J. and Buckley, D. E. 1976. Supershrimp: deep bioturbation in the Strait of Canso, Nova Scotia. Science, 192:790–791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, R. R. 1974. The functional morphology of the fore-guts of the thalassinid crustaceans, Callianassa californiensis and Upogebia pugettensis. University of California Publications in Zoology, 102:1–41.Google Scholar
Rhoads, D. C. and Young, D. K. 1970. The influence of deposit-feeding organisms on bottom stability and community tropic structure. Journal of Marine Research, 28:150–178.Google Scholar
Sheehan, P. M. and Schiefelbein, D. R. J. 1984. The trace fossil Thalassinoides from the Upper Ordovician of the eastern Great Basin: deep burrowing in the early Paleozoic. Journal of Paleontology, 58:440–447.Google Scholar
Swinbanks, D. D. 1979. Environmental factors controlling floral zonation and the distribution of burrowing and tube-dwelling organisms on Fraser Delta tidal flats, British Columbia. Unpubl. Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., 274 p.Google Scholar
Swinbanks, D. D. 1982. Intertidal exposure zones: a way to subdivide the shore. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 62:69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinbanks, D. D. and Murray, J. W. 1981. Biosedimentological zonation of Boundary Bay tidal flats, Fraser River Delta, British Columbia. Sedimentology, 28:201–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, L. C. and Pritchard, A. W. 1969. Osmoregulatory capacities of Callianassa and Upogebia (Crustacea: Thalassinidea). Biological Bulletin, 136:114–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. K. 1972. Functional morphology of the hind-gut of Upogebia pugettensis (Crustacea, Thalassinidea) and its role in burrow construction. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 202 p.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. K. and Pritchard, A. W. 1969. Respiratory adaptations of two burrowing crustaceans, Callianassa californiensis and Upogebia pugettensis (Decapoda, Thalassinidea). Biological Bulletin, 136:274–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres, J. J., Gluck, D. L. and Childress, J. J. 1977. Activity and physiological significance of the pleopods in the respiration of Callianassa californiensis Dana (Crustacea: Thalassinidea). Biological Bulletin, 152:134–146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warme, J. E. 1967. Graded bedding in the Recent sediments of Mugu Lagoon, California. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 37:540–547.Google Scholar
Weimer, R. J. and Hoyt, J. H. 1964. Burrows of Callianassa major Say as indicators of littoral and shallow neritic environments. Journal of Paleontology, 38:761–767.Google Scholar
Woodin, S. A. 1974. Polychaete abundance patterns in a marine soft-sediment environment. The importance of biological interactions. Ecological Monographs, 44:171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodin, S. A. 1976. Adult-larval interactions in dense faunal assemblages: patterns of abundance. Journal of Marine Research, 34:25–41.Google Scholar