Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:26:50.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Barnacles, their molluscan hosts, and comparative ecology in the St. Mary’s Formation (late Miocene) of Maryland, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2018

Geerat J. Vermeij  and
Sara K. Ruch
Geerat J. Vermeij
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, USA 〈[email protected]〉, 〈[email protected]〉
Sara K. Ruch
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, USA 〈[email protected]〉, 〈[email protected]〉
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fossils can inform the study of modern ecosystems by showing how species interactions in ancient communities compare with those today and how extinction is selective not only with respect to species but also with respect to entire modes of life. We studied the life habits and pattern of occurrence of the barnacle Chesaconcavus chesapeakensis Zullo, 1992 on the shells of the gastropod Conradconfusus parilis (Conrad) and the bivalve Chesapecten santamaria (Tucker) from Chancellor’s Point in the Windmill Point Member of the St. Mary’s Formation (late Miocene, Tortonian) of Maryland. Using several criteria, we show that the barnacle occupied living hosts only. The 59% incidence of the barnacle on Conradconfusus parilis is high compared to known living associations between barnacles and gastropods. Although Conradconfusus parilis with and without barnacles do not differ in size, suggesting that the barnacle had little effect on this gastropod, there is some indication that Chesapecten santamaria with barnacles are somewhat smaller than those without and may therefore have been adversely affected by the presence of barnacles. On the basis of morphology and the low (15%) incidence of repaired scars, Conradconfusus parilis was a predator that did not use its shell lip to subdue prey. No ecological equivalents of Conradconfusus and Chesaconcavus have existed in the temperate northwestern Atlantic between Cape Cod and Cape Hatteras for the past three million years.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 92 , Issue 2 , March 2018 , pp. 183 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © 2018, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbate, D., and Simone, L.R.L., 2015, Review of Pugilina from the Atlantic with description of a new species from Brazil (Neogastropoda, Melongenidae): African Invertebrates, v. 59, p. 559–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowling, C., 1994, Habitat and size of the Florida crown conch (Melongena corona Gmelin): Why big snails hang out at bars: Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, v. 175, p. 181–195.Google Scholar
Buschbaum, C., and Saier, B., 2001, Growth of the mussel Mytilus edulis L. in the Wadden Sea affected by tidal emergence and barnacle epibionts: Journal of Sea Research, v. 45, p. 27–36.Google Scholar
Cadée, G.C., 2007, Balanuliths: Free-living clusters of the barnacle Balanus crenatus : Palaios, v. 22, p. 680–681.Google Scholar
Casey, M.M., Farrell, K.C., Dietl, G.P., and Veilleux, D.J., 2015, Mixed assemblages of drilling predators and the problem of identity in the fossil record: A case study using the muricid gastropod Ecphora : Paleobiology, v. 41, p. 680–696.Google Scholar
Chan, D.H.L., and Chan, B.K.K., 2005, Effects of epibionts on the fitness of the sandy shore snail Batillaria zonalis in Hong Kong: Marine Biology, v. 146, p. 695–705.Google Scholar
Crisp, D.J., 1961, Territorial behaviour in barnacle settlement: Journal of Experimental Biology, v. 38, p. 729–746.Google Scholar
Crisp, D.J., and Barnes, H., 1954, The orientation and distribution of barnacles at settlement with particular reference to surface contour: Journal of Animal Ecology, v. 23, p. 142–162.Google Scholar
Dietl, G.P., 2003a, Coevolution of a marine gastropod predator and its dangerous bivalve prey: Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, v. 80, p. 409–436.Google Scholar
Dietl, G.P., 2003b, Interaction strength between a predator and dangerous prey: Sinistrofulgur predation on Mercenaria : Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, v. 289, p. 287–301.Google Scholar
Dietl, G.P., 2004, Origins and circumstances of adaptive divergence in whelk feeding behavior: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 208, p. 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietl, G.P., Durham, S.R., and Kelley, P.R., 2010, Shell repair as a reliable indicator of bivalve predation by shell-wedging gastropods in the fossil record: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 296, p. 174–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, S.K., 2007, A cautionary tale: Razor shells, acorn barnacles and palaeoecology: Palaeontology, v. 50, p. 1479–1484.Google Scholar
Durham, S.R., Dietl, G.P., and Visaggi, C.C., 2012, The mismeasure of behavior: Natural history revision of prey preference in the banded tulip snail: Journal of Shellfish Research, v. 31, p. 101–109.Google Scholar
El Ayari, T., Lahbib, Y., and El Menif, N.T., 2015, Associated fauna and effects of epibiotic barnacles on the relative growth and reproductive indices of Stramonita haemastoma (Gastropoda: Muricidae): Scientia Marina, v. 79, p. 223–232.Google Scholar
Gould, S.J., 1971, Muscular mechanisms and the ontogeny of swimming in scallops: Palaeontology, v. 14, p. 61–94.Google Scholar
Iyengar, E.V., Sitvarin, M.I., and Cataldo, M., 2008, Function of the flexible periostracal hairs in Trichotropis cancellatus : Invertebrate Biology, v. 127, p. 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, B.W., 1983, Diet expansion of Busycon contrarium in the absence of Triplofusus giganteus (Gastropoda: Buccinacea): Nautilus, v. 97, p. 103–104.Google Scholar
Landau, B., and Vermeij, G.J., 2013, A new species of Pugilina (Gastropoda, Caenogastropoda, Melongeninae) from the lower Miocene Cantaure Formation of Venezuela: Basteria, v. 77, p. 89–95.Google Scholar
Lescinsky, H.L., Edinger, E., and Risk, M.J., 2002, Mollusc shell encrustation and bioerosion rates in a modern epeiric sea: Taphonomy experiments in the Java Sea, Indonesia: Palaios, v. 17, p. 171–191.Google Scholar
Matthews-Cascon, H., Matthews, H.R., and Ferreira Belúcio, L., 1990, Notas sobre a anatomia, sistemática e biologia de Pugilina morio (Linnaeus, 1758) (Mollusca: Gastropoda): Arquivos de Ciencias do Mar, v. 28, p. 3–8.Google Scholar
Morton, B.S., 1985, Prey preference, capture and ration in Hemifusus tuba (Gmelin) (Prosobranchia: Melongenidae): Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, v. 94, p. 191–210.Google Scholar
Morton, B.S., 1986, Prey preference and capture by Hemifusus ternatanus (Gastropoda: Melongenidae): Malacological Review, v. 19, p. 107–110.Google Scholar
Newman, W.A., 1960, The paucity of intertidal barnacles in the tropical western Pacific: Veliger, v. 2, p. 89–94.Google Scholar
Nielsen, C., 1975, Observations on Buccinum undatum L. attacking bivalves and on prey responses, with a short review on attack methods of other prosobranchs: Ophelia, v. l13, p. 87–108.Google Scholar
Nielsen, S.N., 2009, Pliocene balanuliths from northern Chile: The first report of fossil balanuliths: Palaios, v. 25, p. 334–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petuch, E.J., 1988, New gastropods from the Maryland Miocene: Bulletin of Paleomalacology, v. 1, p. 69–82.Google Scholar
Petuch, E.J., 1993, Patterns of diversity and extinction in Transmarian muricacean, buccinacean, and conacean gastropods: Nautilus, v. 106, p. 155–173.Google Scholar
Petuch, E.J., 2004, Cenozoic Seas: The View from Eastern North America: Boca Raton, CRC Press, 308 p.Google Scholar
Petuch, E.J., and Drolshagen, M., 2010, Molluscan Paleontology of the Chesapeake Miocene: Boca Raton: CRC Press, 160 p.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R.J., 1971, Trophic interaction between the sea star Pisaster giganteus and the gastropod Kelletia kelleti : Fisheries Bulletin, v. 69, p. 669–679.Google Scholar
Schmitt, R.J., Osenberg, C.W., and Bercovich, M.G., 1983, Mechanisms and consequences of shell fouling in the kelp snail, Norrisia norrisi (Sowerby) (Trochidae): Indirect effect of Octopus drilling: Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, v. 69, p. 267–281.Google Scholar
Scolding, J.W.S., Richardson, C.A., and Luckenbach, M.J., 2007, Predation of cockles (Cerastoderma edule) by the whelk (Buccinum undatum) under laboratory conditions: Journal of Molluscan Studies, v. 73, p. 333–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimek, R.L., 1984, The diets of Alaskan Neptunea : Veliger, v. 26, p. 264–281.Google Scholar
Silina, A.V., and Zhukova, N.V., 2016, Association of the scallop Patinopecten yessoensis and epibiotic barnacle Balanus rostratus: Inter-specific interactions and trophic relationships determined by fatty acid analysis: Marine Ecology, v. 37, p. 257–268.Google Scholar
Snyder, M.A., 2002, Conradoconfusus, a replacement name for Buccinofusus Conrad, 1868, non 1866 (Mollusca, Gastropoda): Cainozoic Research, v. 1, p. 129–132.Google Scholar
Stanley, S.M., 1986, Population size, extinction, and speciation: The fission effect in Neogene Bivalvia: Paleobiology, v. 12, p. 89–110.Google Scholar
Stupakoff, I., 1986, Observations on the feeding behavior of the gastropod Pleuroploca princeps (Fasciolariidae) in the Galapagos Islands: Nautilus, v. 100, p. 92–95.Google Scholar
Tan, K.S., and Phuah, C.L., 1999, Diet and feeding habits of Pugilina cochlidium (Neogastropoda: Melongenidae) in Singapore: Journal of Molluscan Studies, v. 65, p. 499–501.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.D., and Glover, E.A., 2003, Food of giants—field observations on the diet of Syrinx aruanus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Turbinellidae) the largest living gastropod, in Wells, F.E., Walker, D.I., and Jones, D.S., eds., The Marine Flora and Fauna of Dampier: Western Australia, Perth, Western Australian Museum, p. 217–223.Google Scholar
Thieltges, D.W., and Buschbaum, C., 2007, Vicious circle in the intertidal: Facilitating between barnacle epibiont, a shell-boring polychaete and trematode parasites in the periwinkle Littorina littorea : Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, v. 349, p. 90–95.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G.J., 2005, From Europe to America: Pliocene to Recent trans-Atlantic expansion of cold-water North Atlantic molluscs: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, v. 272, p. 2545–2550.Google ScholarPubMed
Vermeij, G.J., 2012, The evolution of gigantism on temperate seashores: Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, v. 106, p. 776–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G.J., 2015, Fossil predation: Did some clavilithine fasciolariid gastropods employ valve-wedging to feed on bivalves?: Vita Malacologica, v. 13, p. 27–30.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G.J., 2017, Shell features associated with the sand-burying habit in gastropods: Journal of Molluscan Studies, v. 83, p. 153–160.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G.J., and Raven, H., 2009, Southeast Asia as the birthplace of unusual traits: The Melongenidae (Gastropoda) of northwest Borneo: Contributions to Zoology, v. 78, p. 113–127.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G.J., Dietl, G.P., and Reid, D.G., 2008, The trans-Atlantic history of diversity and body size in ecological guilds: Ecology, v. 89, p. S39–S52.Google Scholar
Walker, S.E., 1988, Taphonomic significance of hermit crabs (Anomura: Paguridea): Epifaunal hermit crab – infaunal gastropod example: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 63, p. 45–71.Google Scholar
Walker, S.E., 1992, Criteria for recognizing marine hermit crabs in the fossil record using gastropod shells: Journal of Paleontology, v. 66, p. 535–558.Google Scholar
Ward, L.W., 1992, Molluscan biostratigraphy of the Miocene, Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain of North America: Virginia Museum of Natural History Memoir, v. 2, p. 1–159.Google Scholar
Ward, L.W., and Blackwelder, B.W., 1975, Chesapecten, a new genus of Pectinidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia) from the Miocene and Pliocene of eastern North America: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, v. 861, p. 1–24.Google Scholar
Wethey, D.S., 1986, Ranking of settlement cues by barnacle larvae: Influence of surface contour: Bulletin of Marine Science, v. 39, p. 393–400.Google Scholar
Zullo, V.A., 1992, Revision of the balanid barnacle genus Concavus Newman, 1982, with the description of a new subfamily, two new genera, and eight new species: Paleontological Society Memoir, v. 27, p. 1–46.Google Scholar