Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:59:10.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Culture and Psychopathology: Foundations, Issues, Directions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2012

Anthony J. Marsella*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii, United States of America. [email protected]
Ann Marie Yamada
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, University of Southern California, United States of America.
*
*Address for correspondence: Anthony J. Marsella, Professor Emeritus, Department of Psychology University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The present article offers an overview of the historical influences, conceptual assumptions, and major findings and issues associated with the study of culture and psychopathology. The article traces continuing reductionistic resistance to the incorporation of cultural considerations in the etiology, expression, and treatment of psychopathology to historical and contemporary forces. These forces include ‘cultural context’ of Western psychiatry and psychology, which choose to locate the determinants of behaviour in the human mind and brain. A definition of culture that acknowledges its internal and external representations is offered, and steps in the cultural construction of reality are proposed. Within this context, the risks of imposing Western cultural views universally are noted, especially attempts to homogenise classification and diagnostic systems across cultures. ‘Culture-bound’ disorders are used as example of Western bias via the assumption that they have ‘real’ disorders, while the other cultures have disorders that are shaped by culture. Cultural considerations in understanding the rate, etiology, and expression are presented, including recommended criteria for conducting epidemiological studies across cultural boundaries, especially ‘schizophrenic’ disorders as this problematic diagnostic category is subject to multiple cultural variations. The article closes with discussions of ‘cultural competence’ and ‘multilevel’ approaches to behaviour.

Type
Special Section: Cultural Diversity Across the Pacific
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010