Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:28:37.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alcohol-Related Social Gatherings with Coworkers: Intentions to Behave and Intentions to Not Behave

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2012

Hee Sun Park  and
Dong Wook Lee
Hee Sun Park
Affiliation:
Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
Dong Wook Lee*
Affiliation:
Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea
*
Address for correspondence: Dr. Dong Wook Lee, Assistant professor, Department of Civil Engineering (Marine and Environmental Research Institute), Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two studies are reported using the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) to examine Koreans' intentions and self-reported behaviour of joining and not joining alcohol-related social gatherings with work colleagues after work hours. Study 1 showed that group-related attitudes and perceived behavioural control of the TPB components regarding joining were significantly associated with intentions to join. Study 2 examined TPB components regarding not joining and intentions to not join. Study 2 found that although none of the TPB components was directly related to intentions, subjective norms from work colleagues moderated the effect of group-related attitudes on intentions to not join. The TPB components and intentions were not significantly related to self-reported behaviour of joining. The findings indicate that the relationships between the TPB components and intentions can be different for engaging and not engaging in a behaviour.

Keywords

attitudessubjective normsperceived behavioural controlintentions to behaveintentions to not behaveSouth Korea
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , December 2011 , pp. 53 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

References

Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behavior. Milton-Keynes, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Johnson, B.T., Fishbein, M., & Muellerleile, P.A. (2001). Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 142–161.Google Scholar
Armitage, C.J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chau, P.Y.K. & Hu, P.J.-H. (2001). Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: A model comparison approach. Decision Sciences, 32, 699–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Y.-H., & Yoon, J. (2002). The origin and function of dynamic collectivism: An analysis of Korean corporate culture. In Rowley, C.Sohn, T.-W., & Bae, J. (Eds.), Managing Korean business: Organization, culture, human resource and change (pp. 70–88). London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Choi, S.-H., Kim, M., & Kim, K.-K. (2001). [Drinking behavior and related factors among white collar workers in Seoul]. [Journal of Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion], 18, 27–44.Google Scholar
Codd, R.T., & Cohen, B.N. (2003). Predicting college student intention to seek help for alcohol abuse. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22, 168–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrao, G., Bagnardi, V., Zambon, A., & Arico, S. (1999). Exploring the dose-response relationship between alcohol consumption and the risk of several alcohol-related conditions: A meta-analysis. Addiction, 94, 1551–1573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fekadu, Z., & Kraft, P. (2002). Expanding the theory of planned behaviour: The role of social norms and group identification. Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 33–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godin, G., & Kok, G. (1996). The theory of planned behavior: A review of its applications to health-related behaviors. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagger, M.S., Anderson, M., Kyriakaki, M., & Darkings, S. (2007). Aspects of identity and their influence on intentional behavior: Comparing effects for three health behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequence. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hu, S.-C., & Lanese, R.R. (1998). The applicability of the theory of planned behavior to the intention to quit smoking across workplaces in southern Taiwan. Addictive Behaviors, 23, 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jo, H., Lee, S., Ahn, M.O., & Jung, S.H. (2003). Structural relationship of factors affecting health promotion behaviors. Health Promotion International, 18, 229–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, J.K. (1986). [Recent Drinking patterns of Koreans]. [Mental Health Research], 4, 9–19.Google Scholar
Kim, M.-S. (2002). Non-Western perspectives on human communication: Implications for theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korea National Statistical Office. (2003). 2002 [The results of 2002 death cause statistics survey]. Daejeon, Korea: Author.Google Scholar
Lee, K.S. (2009). The drinking patterns and tendencies of public officials (Master's thesis, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea). Retrieved from http://www.riss.krGoogle Scholar
Lee, C., & Green, R.T. (1991). Cross-cultural examination of the Fishbein behavioral intention model. Journal of International Business Studies, 22, 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.A, Park, H.S., & Choi, J. (2011). The relationship between communication climate and elementary teachers' beliefs about alternative assessment. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 5(1), 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, T.S., Lee, D.W., Lee, H.E., & Park, H.S. (2005). Superior-subordinate relationship in Korean civil engineering companies. Journal of Management in Engineering, 21, 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D.W., Park, H.S., Lee, T.S., Kim, M.K., & Kim, Y.H. (2006). Korean working adults' and undergraduate students' attitudes towards, and self-efficacy in, joining drinking parties. Social Behavior and Personality, 34, 487–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D.W., Park, H.S., Lee, T.S., Kim, M.K., & Kim, Y.H. (2007). Functions of social gatherings involving alcohol consumption with coworkers in Korea. Asian Journal of Communication, 17, 266–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2003). 2001 [The results of health and nutrition survey in the year of 2001]. Gwa Chon, Korea: Author.Google Scholar
Murgraff, V., McDermott, M.R., & Walsh, J. (2001). Exploring attitude and belief correlates of adhering to the new guidelines for low-risk single-occasion drinking: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Alcohol & Alcoholism, 36, 135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myeong, J-O., & Crawley, F.E. (1993). Predicting and understanding Korean high school students' science-track choice: Testing the theory of reasoned action by structural equation modeling. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. (1998). Alcohol and the liver: Research update. Retrieved March, 31, 2004, from http://www.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/aa42.htm Alcohol Alert No. 42. Bethesda, MD: AuthorGoogle Scholar
Norman, P., Bennett, P., & Lewis, H. (1998). Understanding binge drinking among young people: An application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Health Education Research, 13, 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, H.S. (1998). The theory of reasoned action and self-construals in predicting intention of studying among Korean college students. Communication Research Reports, 15, 267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, H.S., & Lee, D.W. (2009). A test of theory of planned behavior in Korea: Participation in alcohol-related social gatherings. International Journal of Psychology, 44, 418–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, H.S., & Levine, T.R. (1999). The theory of reasoned action and self-construals: Evidence from three cultures. Communication Monographs, 66, 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, H.S., & Smith, S.W. (2007). Distinctiveness and influence of subjective norms, personal descriptive and injunctive norms, and societal descriptive and injunctive norms on behavioral intent: A case of two behaviors critical to organ donation. Human Communication Research, 33, 194–218.Google Scholar
Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. In Stroebe, W., & Hewstone, M., (Eds.), European review of social psychology (vol. 12, pp. 1–34). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Sheppard, B.H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P.R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sung, K., & Kim, M. (2009). A comparison of alcohol-related problems between men and women in Korean university students. Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion, 26, 85–95.Google Scholar
Webb, T.L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change?: A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 249–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, K.M., Hogg, M.A., & Terry, D.J. (2002). Improving attitude-behavior correspondence through exposure to normative support from a salient ingroup. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoo, H. (1996). Attitudes, subjective norms, and beliefs of Korean nursing students as predictors of intentions to care for HIV disease patients: A test of theory of reasoned action. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(10), 6183B. (UMI No. 9709111).Google Scholar
Yun, D., & Park, H.S. (2010). Culture and the Theory of Planned Behavior: Organ donation intentions in Americans and Koreans. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 4(2), 130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar