Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:35:46.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Worldwide Database for Digital Nautical Charts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

Adam J. Kerr
Adam J. Kerr
Affiliation:
(International Hydrographic Bureau)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is of historical interest that it was written instructions in the form of periplus, rather than the paper chart, that are recorded as providing the first form of document to guide marine navigators. Therefore perhaps the wheel has turned full circle when it is the digital information rather than the video display that may provide the basic guidance for the navigation of ships in the future. In 1986, when IMO and IHO set out to develop standards and specifications, it was decided that the product to be specified would have to be equivalent to the paper chart. In so doing they were following the guidance of the SOLAS Convention, which requires charts to be carried in Chapter V Regulation 20 and, in Chapter 1 Regulation 5, permits Administrations to substitute equivalents. Regulation V/20 does not state that the charts to be carried be paper but, until recently, it has been assumed that this is what is meant. What is explicit, is that the charts to be carried are to be ‘adequate, up-to-date and necessary for the intended voyage’. Following this guidance, the IMO/IHO Harmonizing Group attempted to specify an electronic system that would be equivalent to a printed paper document. This proved to be no easy task. It was extremely difficult to claim that an electronic system can be as durable and as generally reliable as a sheet of paper. What if the power breaks down? This and many other questions had to be answered before the standards would satisfy the members of IMO.

Keywords

1. Charts.2. Electronic charts.3. Hydrography.
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , May 1995 , pp. 215 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Italian Hydrographic Institute (1992). Manuale dell'Ufficiale di rotta. In this, the first written navigational guidance was reported as the Periplo di Scilace.Google Scholar
2Kerr, A. J. (1990). Status report on activities of IMO and IHO concerning the electronic chart. International Hydrographic Review, LXVII (2), 7–16.Google Scholar
3 International Maritime Organization (1986). Consolidated Text of the Safety of Life at Sea Convention.Google Scholar
4 International Maritime Organization (1994). Performance Standards for Electronic Display and Information Systems (ECDIS), MSC/Circular 637.Google Scholar
5 International Maritime Organization (1994). Appendix 5: Alarms and Indications. Performance Standards for ECDIS, Msc/circular 637.Google Scholar
6Kerr, A. J. and Anderson, N. M. (1982). Communications and the nautical chart. This Journal, 35, 439–449.Google Scholar
7Essenhigh, N. (1994). Letter to the Editor. Hydrographic Journal 73, 40–42.Google Scholar
8 International Hydrographic Organization (1994). Guidance for updating ECDIS. 2nd Edition, S-52, Appendix 1.Google Scholar
9 International Hydrographic Organization (1993). Provisional Colour and Symbol Specifications for ECDIS, 2nd Edition, S-52 Appendix 2.Google Scholar
10Roberts, C. S. et al. (1993). Developing an Electronic Chart Navigation Database (ENCDB) – Australian experience. Hydrographic Journal 70, 13–20.Google Scholar
11Ganjon, F. K. (1992). ECDIS isn't enough. Sea Technology, July 1992, p. 93.Google Scholar
12Boyle, A. R. (1971). Automatic cartography: special problems of hydrographic charting. International Hydrographic Review, XLVIII (2), 86–9.Google Scholar
13Halls, I. W. and Furness, R. A. (1990). The Australian Hydrographic Information System. International Hydrographic Review.Google Scholar
14Varma, H. et al. (1990). A data structure for spatio-temporal databases. International Hydrographic Review, LXVII (1), 71–92.Google Scholar
15Gooding, N. R. L. (1992). Navstar GPS – charting aspects. This Journal, 45, 344–351.Google Scholar
16Carnevali, G. (1994). In presentation at ECDIS 94, Baltimore, USA.Google Scholar
17Kottman, C. A. (1992). Some Questions and Answers about Digital Geographic Information Standards. 2nd Edition, November 1992, pp. 12–15.Google Scholar
18 International Hydrographic Organization (1993). IHO Transfer Standards for Digital Hydrographic Data. Version 2.0.Google Scholar
19 International Maritime Organization (1994). IHO Transfer Standards for Digital Hydrographic Data. Version 2.0.Google Scholar
20 International Hydrographic Organization (1987). Proceedings of the XIIIth International Hydrographic Conference.Google Scholar
21Weeks, C. G. (1991). ECS or ECDIS – or ENS? Hydrographic Journal, 61, 19–22.Google Scholar
22 International Hydrographic Organization (1992). Seminar to discuss the Norwegian electronic chart database proposal. Special Publication 58, March 1992, 75; pages.Google Scholar
23 International Hydrographic Organization (1994). Final Report of the Special Committee on WEND. Internal paper.Google Scholar
24Kerr, A. J. (1994). Conceptual model of a regionally integrated database for ECDIS, International Hydrographic Review, LXXI (2), 37–46.Google Scholar