Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:48:00.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

US Research into Shiphandling Simulators for Mariner Training and Licensing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

Thomas J. Hammell  and
John S. Gardenier
Thomas J. Hammell
Affiliation:
Eclectech Associates, Inc.
John S. Gardenier
Affiliation:
US Coast Guard
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Shiphandling training simulators have come into use since 1967. Several such simulators, with differing technical characteristics and training goals, are now in use around the world. They are commonly used to familiarize already competent masters with new vessels, restricted water areas, or some form of standard bridge procedures. Acceptance of these simulators by highly experienced master trainees has been predominantly favourable. Ship radar simulators have been in use for a somewhat longer time. They are typically used for training entry level officers as well as experienced masters.

The aviation and nuclear reactor industries, with a greater experience of simulator technology and its training value, use simulators for both training and licensing. The military (e.g. Navy) and other government agencies (e.g. National Aeronautics and Space Administration) have extensively used simulators for training and qualification. It has been suggested (Schumacker, Madsen and Nicastro, 1972; IMCO Standards of Training and Watchkeeping Convention of 1978, Resolution 17) that simulators could be used for proficiency demonstration on the part of mariners. The US Port and Tanker Safety Act of 1978 requires standards for licence qualifications by use of simulators.

The United States Coast Guard and Maritime Administration have funded research into the role, technology, and effectiveness of ship-handling simulators. Depending partly on conclusions from this research, the Coast Guard will consider partial credit toward licences for successful completion of approved simulator training. The Maritime Administration may assist maritime training academies to design and procure simulator-based training systems.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , January 1980 , pp. 121 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bertsche, W. R. and Pesch, A. J. (1977). An Automated Standardized Bridge Design for the US Merchant Marine, Executive Summary. Washington, DC: United States Maritime Administration.Google Scholar
Chenzoff, A. P. and Folley, J. D. (1965). Guidelines for training situation analysis, NAVTRADEVCEN, 1218–14.Google Scholar
Cream, F. T., Eggemeier, T. and Klein, G. A. (1978). ‘A strategy for the development of training devices,’ Human Factors 20, 145.Google Scholar
Gagne, R. M. (1966). The Conditions of Learning. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Hammell, T. J., Williams, W. E., Grasso, J. A. and Evans, W. (1979). Role of Simulation in the Mariner Training and Licensing Process. Conducted by the US National Maritime Research Center, Kings Point, New York (expected to be published in late 1979).Google Scholar
Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization (IMCO) (1978). International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification, and Watchkeeping for Seafarers.Google Scholar
Jeantheau, G. G. (1970). Handbook for Training Systems Evaluation (U). NAVTRADEVCEN, 66–C–0011–1. Orlando, Florida: Naval Training Device Center.Google Scholar
Mara, T. D. (1978). Final Report:Human Factors in Ship Control, vol. I, II and III. General Dynamics, Groton, Connecticut, January 6.Google Scholar
Oceanographic Institute of Washington (1975). Technical Report for Study of Human Performance Relqted to Bridge Personnel on Maritime Vessels. Vol. I. Presentation of Results. Seattle, Washington. (December.)Google Scholar
Schumacker, D. J., Madsen, S. A. and Nicastro, F. Y. (1972). Aviation/Marine A Study of Contract, presented to 17th Annual Tanker Conference of the Central Committee on Transportation by Water of the Division of Transportation – American Petroleum Institute. May 8–10, 1972.Google Scholar
Simon, C. W.Applications of Advanced Experimental Methodologies to AWAUS Training Research, NAVTRAEQUIPCEN 77–C–0065–1 (1979). Orlando, Florida: Naval Training Equipment Center, January, 1979.Google Scholar
Smith, J., Daniels, P., Paramore, B. and Porricelli, J.Task Analysis Report Relative to Vessel Collisions, Ramming and Groundings, vol. I, II and III. Operations Research, Incorporated, Silver Springs, Maryland, December 1976.Google Scholar
Smode, A., Gruber, A. and Ely, J. H.Human Factors Technology in the Design of Simulators for Operator Training, US Naval Training Device Center, Port Washington, NY NAVTRADEVCEN, 1103–1, 1963.Google Scholar
Van Manen, J. D. and Hooft, J. P. (1970). A Three Dimensional Simulator for Maneuvering of Surface Ships. International Shipbuilding Progress.Google Scholar