Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T19:29:55.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tobias Mayer's Claim for the Longitude Prize: A Study in 18th Century Anglo-German Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

Eric G. Forbes
Eric G. Forbes
Affiliation:
(University of Edinburgh)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper describes the historical background to the Göttingen Professor Tobias Mayer's bid under the terms of the Act 12 Queen Anne, cap. XX (1714) to obtain a reward for having constructed lunar tables of unprecedented accuracy (to about ± ½′) which promised to make both useful and practicable the lunar-distance method of finding longitude at sea. Parliament's decision in 1765 to award £3000 to Mayer's heirs marked the end of an eleven-year period of lively correspondence conducted on the latter's behalf between Professor Johann David Michaelis, Secretary of Hanoverian Affairs in Göttingen, and William Philip Best, one of George III's Privy Secretaries in London. The Nautical Almanac came into existence as a direct consequence of the success of these diplomatic negotiations.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , January 1975 , pp. 77 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Philos, Cod. Ms.. 157, ff. 46–88. ‘Briefe Ch. L. Scheidt an Joh. Dav. Michaelis’ (1754–1755)Google Scholar
Philos, Cod. Ms. 159, pp. 1–65. ‘Briefe von and an J. Tobias Mayer’.Google Scholar
Michael, Cod. Ms.. 320, pp. 535–671. This includes 27 letters between Michaelis and Best, 7 letters from Best to Gerlach Adolph von Munchhausen in Hanover, and two other letters from Best to Lord Anson (First Lord of the Admiralty) and to Best from James Bradley (Third Astronomer Royal).Google Scholar
Etat, 32, 1, nos. 1–56. ‘Verhandlungen betr. das Vermächtnis Tobias Mayers, 1762–96.’Google Scholar
Personalakte Tobias Mayer 4/Vb 18, nos. 1–29.Google Scholar
Ibid., nos. 1–10. ‘Betr.: den Hauskauf des Profess. Philosoph. Mayer 1754–1757.’Google Scholar
Des, Hannover. 92 XXXIV No. II, 4, a1, ff. 1–104. ‘Betr. der von Seiten des Prof. Tobias Mayer in Göttingen gelöste englische Preisfrage über die Bestimmung der Longitudino maris. 1754–1765.’Google Scholar
Board of Longitude Mss, Vol. I, no. 5, pp. 143–155. ‘Payment of Reward to Tobias Mayer, to his widow (1763–5).’Google Scholar
Forbes, Eric G. (1971). The Euler-Majer Correspondence (1751–55)—a new perspective on eighteenth-century advances in the lunar theory. Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, Eric G. (1971). Tobias Mayer's Opera Inedita—the first translation of the Lichtenberg, edition of 1775. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Forbes, Eric G. (1974). The Birth of Navigational Science, National Maritime Museum Monograph No. 10. H.M.S.O., London.Google Scholar
(1970). Tobias Mayer. Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte des 18. Jahrhunderts, in Otto, Borsch(ed.). Jahrbuch für Geschichte der oberdentschen Reichsstädte, 16, pp. 132–167. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
(1973). Tobias Mayer (1723–1762). A case study in the interaction between cartography, astronomy, and navigation during the 18 th century. Paul, Fritz and David, Williams (eds.).Google Scholar
City and Society in the 18th Century, pp. 165–175. Hakkert, Toronto.Google Scholar
(1965). The foundation and early development of the Nautical Almanac. This Journal, 18, 391–401.Google Scholar
(1966). The origin and development of the marine chronometer. Annals of Science, 22, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer's, Tobias Lunar Tables, (1966). The origin and development of the marine chronometer. Annals of Science, 22, 105–116.Google Scholar
(1967). The bicentenary of the Nautical Almanac (1767). British Journal for the History of Science, 3, 393–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1970). Mayer, Tobias (1723–62): A case of forgotten genius, The bicentenary of the Nautical Almanac (1767), 5, 1–20.Google Scholar
(1970). Tobias Mayer's contributions to the development of lunar theory. Journal for the History of Astronomy, 1, 144–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1971). Mayer's, TobiasNew Astrolabe (1759)—its principles and construction. Annals of Science, 27, 109–116.Google Scholar
(1971). Who discovered longitude at sea ? Sky and Telescope, 41, 4–6.Google Scholar
(1974). The foundation of the first Göttingen Observatory—a study in politics and personalities. Journal for the History of Astronomy, 5, 22–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar