Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:49:43.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ship's Wheelhouse of the Nineties: the Navigation Performance and Mental Workload of the Officer of the Watch

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

H. Schuffel ,
J. P. A. Boer  and
L. van Breda
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The search for more efficient ship operation has increased over the last decade. One trend towards reducing operational costs is to conceive the wheelhouse as an operational centre for performing both navigational and supervisory tasks, such as monitoring the propulsion plant status and the condition of ship and cargo.

Under contract to the National Foundation for the Coordination of Maritime Research in The Netherlands, a study was conducted on the feasibility of a highly automated wheelhouse for single-handed navigation. In a series of simulation experiments, and by analysis, the effects on efficiency and safety of performance were investigated.

Results show that a careful function allocation can lead to an automated wheelhouse concept suitable for safe navigation in landfall conditions. Questions concerning the effects of monotonous watches on operator's alertness and the effects of the change in task structure on the operator's skill and interest in the job need further attention.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , January 1989 , pp. 60 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Döring, B. (1976). Analytical methods in man— machine system development. In Introduction to Human Engineering (ed. Kraiss, & Moraal, ). Köln: UVR.Google Scholar
2Wiener, E. L. and Curry, R. E. (1980). Flight deck automation: promises and problems. Ergonomics, 23, 995—1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3van Breda, L., van Donselaar, H. and Schuffel, H. (1983). Preview on behalf of a navigation bridge for the 90s. Report M 49048. / 2 (in Dutch). MaritimeResearch Institute of the Netherlands.Google Scholar
4Baty, P. L. and Watkins, M. L. (1979). An advanced cockpit instrumentation system: the coordinated cockpit display. NASA Technical Memorandum 78559.Google Scholar
5Sniffin, R. A., Puckett, L. J. and Edmonds, P. H. (1979). The integrated bridge system project. Final Report, PAS 79—3. David Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center, Annapolis.Google Scholar
6Millar, I. C. and Hansford, R. F. (1983). The MANAV integrated navigation system. This Journal, 36, 1.Google Scholar
7Boer, J. P. A. and Schuffel, H. (1985). Navigation performance and mental load of the conning officer during one-person watch keeping. Report 85 C—7 (in Dutch). TNO Institute for Perception.Google Scholar
8Boer, J. P. A. and Schuffel, H. (1985). Bridge 90: navigation performance and mental workload of the conning officer. Report 85 C—14 (in Dutch). TNO Institute for Perception.Google Scholar
9Boer, J. P. A., van Breda, L. and Schuffel, H. (1986). The ship's wheelhouse of the 90s: effects of ship traffic on the navigation performance and mental workload of the officer of the watch. Report 86 C—5 (in Dutch). TNO Institute for Perception.Google Scholar
10Kristiaansen, S. (1980). Analysis of ship casualties and its application in design of bridges. International Symposium on Advances of Marine Technology, Oslo.Google Scholar
11Schuffel, H. (1986). Human control of ships in tracking tasks. Doctoral Thesis, TNO Institute for Perception, Soesterberg.Google Scholar
12Schuffel, H. (1987). The automated ship's bridge: human error resistant? Report (in Dutch). TNO Institute for Perception.Google Scholar