Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:32:51.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scheduling and simulation of maritime traffic in congested waterways: an application to the Strait of Istanbul

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2021

Şirin Özlem ,
İlhan Or  and
Yiğit Can Altan Open the ORCID record for Yiğit Can Altan [Opens in a new window]
Şirin Özlem*
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Engineering, Isik University, Istanbul, Turkey.
İlhan Or
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Engineering, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Yiğit Can Altan
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, Ozyegin University, Istanbul, Turkey
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop a simulation model which is capable of mimicking actual vessel arrival patterns and vessel entrance decisions (which are made based on expert opinions generally) on congested, narrow waterways. The model is tested on the transit traffic pattern in the Strait of Istanbul. Based on a heuristic scheduling algorithm, this model decides entrance times and vessel types on the strait. The model, with different policies for day and night traffic, is run for a period of seven years with 20 replications for each year. The performance measures of the model are: average interarrival times, number of vessels passed and entrance times for each successive vessel pair in both traffic directions. The model results are congruent with the actual results of performance measures. Therefore, it may be deduced that the proposed algorithm can be a guide for operators regarding scheduling decisions in congested, narrow waterways.

Keywords

real-time schedulingvessel traffic servicesstraits
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 74 , Issue 3 , May 2021 , pp. 656 - 672
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almaz, A. (2006). Investigation of Transit Maritime Traffic in the Strait of Istanbul through Simulation Modeling and Scenario Analysis. Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
Almaz, O. A. and Altiok, T. (2012). Simulation modeling of the vessel traffic in Delaware River: Impact of deepening on port performance. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 22, 146–165. doi: 10.1016/j.simpat.2011.12.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altan, Y. C. and Otay, E. N. (2017). Maritime traffic analysis of the Strait of Istanbul based on AIS data. Journal of Navigation, 70(06), 1367–1382. doi: 10.1017/S0373463317000431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boğazlardan geçen gemi sayısı azaldı. Available at: https://www.denizhaber.net/bogazlardan-gecen-gemi-sayisi-azaldi-haber-60404.htm [Accessed 29 Jan. 2019].Google Scholar
Candanoglu, O. (2013). Scheduling Transit Vessels in the Istanbul Strait. Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
Chen, X., Zhang, X., Liu, T., Lin, J. and Yao, S. (2015). The Vessel Schedule Optimization Based on Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm PoS(CENet2015)005. Available at: http://pos.sissa.it/ [Accessed 5 Apr. 2020].Google Scholar
Cheraghchi, F., Abualhaol, I., Falcon, R., Abielmona, R., Raahemi, B. and Petriu, E. (2017) Big-Data-Enabled Modelling and Optimization of Granular Speed-Based Vessel Schedule Recovery Problem. In Proceedings - 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Big Data 2017. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 1786–1795. doi: 10.1109/BigData.2017.8258122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ece, J. (2007). Istanbul Bogazı Deniz Kazaları ve Analizi. DEKAŞ Kültür Yayınları, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Filipowicz, W. (2004). Vessel traffic control problems. Journal of Navigation, 57(1), 15–24. doi: 10.1017/S0373463303002480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golkar, J., Shekhar, A. and Buddhavarapu, S. (1998). Panama Canal Simulation Model. In Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE, 1229–1237. doi: 10.1109/WSC.1998.745984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köse, E., Başar, E., Demirci, E., Güneroğlu, A. and Erkebay, Ş. (2003). Simulation of marine traffic in Istanbul Strait. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, doi: 10.1016/j.simpat.2003.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalla-Ruis, E., Shi, X. and Voß, S. (2018). The waterway ship scheduling problem. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 60, 191–209. doi: 10.1016/J.TRD.2016.09.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrick, J. R., Van Dorp, J. R., Mazzuchi, T., Harrald, J. R., Spahn, J. E. and Grabowski, M. (2002). The Prince William Sound Risk Assessment. Interfaces, doi: 10.1287/inte.32.6.25.6474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrick, J. R., Van Dorp, J. R., Blackford, J. P., Shaw, G. L., Harrald, J. and Mazzuchi, T. A. (2003). A traffic density analysis of proposed ferry service expansion in San Francisco Bay using a maritime simulation model. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 119–132. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(03)00054-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Or, I. and Kahraman, I. (2002). A simulation study of the accident risk in the Istanbul Channel. International Journal of Emergency Management, 1(2), 110–124. doi: 10.1504/IJEM.2002.000514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özlem, Ş. (2011). Simulation of the Vessel Traffic in the Strait of Istanbul. Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
Qu, X. and Meng, Q. (2012). Development and applications of a simulation model for vessels in the Singapore Straits. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(9), 8430–8438. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahimikelarijani, B., et al. (2018). Simulation modeling of Houston Ship Channel vessel traffic for optimal closure scheduling. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 80, 89–103. doi: 10.1016/j.simpat.2017.10.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluiman, F. J. (2017). Transit vessel scheduling. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 64(3), 225–248. doi: 10.1002/nav.21742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulusçu, Ö. S., Özbas, B., Altiok, T., Or, I. and Yilmaz, T. (2009). Transit vessel scheduling in the strait of Istanbul. Journal of Navigation, 62(1), 59–77. doi: 10.1017/S0373463308005092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viran, A. (2014). Doing Risk Map of the Dense Traffic Region of Istanbul Strait (South Region) Based on Automatic Identification System (in Turkish). Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar