Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:36:02.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Safety and Air Navigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

Extract

With the growth of public air transport, safety in the air is a matter of concern not just to those who design, manufacture and operate aircraft, but to the public at large. After an accident has occurred and an unfortunate chain of events leading to the accident is exposed, it may be easy to say ‘this accident should not have occurred’ or ‘would not have occurred if…’. Publication of annual totals brings forth informed and uninformed comment on the apparent decrease or increase in the accident rate relative to some criteria such as the number of passenger kilometres flown. The objective of this paper is to present a scientific account of the evidence on the relationship between navigation and air accidents and the implications of this evidence for those who are professionally concerned with air navigation. As will become evident, how-ever, there are factors operating which go much deeper than the technical aspects and appear to have their roots in human behaviour, not just of the individual but of organizations and society as a whole.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Aircraft Accident Reports Brief Format, U.S. Civil Aviation 1972, National Transportation Safety Board.Google Scholar
2World Airline Accident Summary, Air Registration Board.Google Scholar
3ICAO Circular 88-AN/74 No. 2Google Scholar
4Air Safety 1974, Flight International, 105, 33, 84.Google Scholar
5 British Airways—private communication.Google Scholar
6Ruffell Smith, H. P. (1968). Some human factors of aircraft accidents involving collisions with high ground. This Journal, 21, 354.Google Scholar
7Cox, V. J. (1970). The use of a weather radar as a terrain warning system. This Journal, 23, 149.Google Scholar
8Beukers, J. M. (1973). Accuracy limitation of the Omega navigation system employed in the differential mode, Navigation (U.S.A.), 20, 81.Google Scholar
9Grimes, C. (1973). A survey of marine accidents, Marine Traffic Engineering, Royal Institute of Navigation, Royal Institution of Naval Architects, 112.Google Scholar
10Klass, P. J. (1974). Anti-collision systems report readied, Aviation Week, 11 Feb., 38.Google Scholar
11 Accidents to aircraft in the British register/1972, C.A.A. London.Google Scholar
12Reich, P. G. (1966). Separation standards (I, II, III). This Journal, 19, 88, 169, 331.Google Scholar
13Hunter, I. M. (1969). Collision avoidance in the air. This Journal, 22, 381.Google Scholar
14Ratcliffe, S. (1972). Manœuvre in response to collision warning from airborne devices. This Journal, 25, 460.Google Scholar
15Ratcliffe, S. (1973). Collision avoidance and the future of air traffic control. This Journal, 26, 423.Google Scholar
16Braverman, N. (1971). Aviation system design for safety and efficiency, Navigation (U.S.A.), 18, 308.Google Scholar
17Starr, C. (1969). Social benefit versus technological risk, Science, 165, Spe 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Sowby, F. D. (1965). Radiation and other risks, Health Physics, 11, 879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Facts in Focus (1972). Table 1, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
20 Britain's private flying accident record, Flight International, 8 Nov. 1973.Google Scholar
21 Transport and Road Research Laboratory—private communication.Google Scholar
22Ramsden, J. M. (1973). World airline safety, Flight International, 17 May.Google Scholar
23Majendie, A. M. A. (1960). The human versus the automatic navigator. This Journal, 13, 105.Google Scholar
24Stratton, A. (1971). Navigation, traffic and the community. This Journal, 24, 1.Google Scholar