Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T23:08:36.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Review of ship navigation safety in fog

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2025

Gege Ding ,
Runze Li ,
Chunxu Li ,
Bingdong Yang ,
Yiqin Li ,
Qiaochan Yu ,
Xiongfei Geng ,
Zhixuan Yao ,
Ke Zhang  and
Jie Wen
Gege Ding
Affiliation:
China Waterborne Transport Research Institute, Beijing 100000, China
Runze Li
Affiliation:
Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, China
Chunxu Li
Affiliation:
China Waterborne Transport Research Institute, Beijing 100000, China
Bingdong Yang
Affiliation:
Huanghua Port Pilot Station, Huanghua 061000, China
Yiqin Li
Affiliation:
China Waterborne Transport Research Institute, Beijing 100000, China
Qiaochan Yu
Affiliation:
China Waterborne Transport Research Institute, Beijing 100000, China
Xiongfei Geng
Affiliation:
China Waterborne Transport Research Institute, Beijing 100000, China
Zhixuan Yao
Affiliation:
China Waterborne Transport Research Institute, Beijing 100000, China
Ke Zhang
Affiliation:
China Waterborne Transport Research Institute, Beijing 100000, China
Jie Wen*
Affiliation:
China Waterborne Transport Research Institute, Beijing 100000, China Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, China
*
*Corresponding author: Jie Wen; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the contemporary maritime industry, characterised by intense competition, reduced visibility due to heavy fog is a primary cause of accidents, significantly impairing maritime operational efficiency. Consequently, investigating foggy weather navigation safety holds crucial practical significance. This paper, through an analysis and synthesis of various aspects of foggy navigation technology, including foggy navigation regulations at different ports, fog warnings, foggy vessel environmental perception and foggy auxiliary navigation systems, explores the key issues concerning vessel navigation during foggy conditions from a scientific perspective. This discussion encompasses the aspects of regulatory frameworks, standardisation, and the development of intelligent and responsive onboard equipment. Finally, the paper offers a glimpse into potential strategies for fog navigation.

Keywords

ship safetyintelligent shippingsea fogfoggy sailing
Type
Review Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , First View , pp. 1 - 21
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of Navigation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahn, M.-H., Sohn, E.-H. and Hwang, B.-J. (2003). A new algorithm for sea fog/stratus detection using GMS-5 IR data. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 20, 899–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auckland Council, . (2010). Operation of vessels during periods of restricted visibility. Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland Council.Google Scholar
Barratt, M. (1976). Collision avoidance manoeuvres in restricted visibility. The Journal of Navigation, 29(4), 364–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, L., Liu, H., Gao, H., et al. (2020). Obstacle Detection and Recognition Using Stereo Vision and Radar Data Alignment for USV. International Conference in Communications, Signal Processing, and Systems. Springer, 1888–1895.Google Scholar
Chen, Z., Chen, D., Zhang, Y., Cheng, X. and Wu, C. (2020). Deep learning for autonomous ship-oriented small ship detection. Safety Science, 130, 104812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, X. Y. (2015). The necessity and countermeasures of fog navigation in my country's coastal ports. China Water Transport, 4(11), 40–43.Google Scholar
Duarte, C. C., Naranjo, B. P. D., López, A. A. and Del Campo, (2005). High Resolution CWLFM Radar for Vessel Detection and Idenfication for Maritime Border Security. Proceedings 39th Annual 2005 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology. IEEE, 304–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estoque, M. A. (1962). The sea breeze as a function of the prevailing synoptic situation. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 19(3), 244–250.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, Q., Cui, J., Huang, D. and Han, J. (2020). Research on target detection algorithm of radar and visible image fusion based on wavelet transform. Tehnički vjesnik, 27(5), 1563–1570.Google Scholar
Findlater, J., Roach, W. T. and McHugh, B. C. (1989). The haar of North-East Scotland. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 115(487), 581–608.Google Scholar
Fisher, E. L. and Caplan, P. (1963). An experiment in numerical prediction of fog and stratus. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 20(5), 425–437.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, G., Zhang, M. and Duan, Y. (2004). Characteristics of sea fog over the yellow sea and the east China sea. Atmosphere, 9(38), 99–107.Google Scholar
Gao, S., Sun, J., Jiang, P., Liu, D., Zhou, X. and Fu, H. (2018). Analysis of Three Dimensional Recovery Algorithms' Influence on the Ranging Accuracy of GM-APD Ladar. Tenth International Conference on Information Optics and Photonics, 10964. SPIE, 171–179.Google Scholar
Gao, X., Gao, S. and Yang, Y. (2018b). A comparison between 3DVAR and EnKF for data assimilation effects on the yellow sea fog forecast. Atmosphere, 9(9), 346–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geng, X., Wang, Y., Wang, P. and Baochen, Z. (2019). Motion plan of maritime autonomous surface ships by dynamic programming for collision avoidance and speed optimization. Sensors, 19, 101971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
German Traffic Rec, . (2023). German traffic regulations for navigable maritime waterways. German Traffic Rec.Google Scholar
Guangdong Maritime Safety Administration. (2021). Regulations on safe navigation of ships within the jurisdiction of Guangdong maritime safety administration. Guangdong Maritime Safety Administration.Google Scholar
Guerriero, M., Willett, P., Coraluppi, S. and Carthel, C. (2008). Radar/AIS Data Fusion and SAR Tasking for Maritime Surveillance. 2008 11th International Conference on Information Fusion. IEEE, 1–5.Google Scholar
Guijo-Rubio, D., Gutiérrez, P. A., Casanova-Mateo, C., Sanz-Justo, J., Salcedo-Sanz, S. and Hervás-Martínez, C. (2018). Prediction of low-visibility events due to fog using ordinal classification. International Conference on Information Fusion, 214, 64–73.Google Scholar
Hair, J. W., Caldwell, L. M., Krueger, D. A. and She, C-Y. (2001). High-spectral-resolution lidar with iodine-vapor filters: measurement of atmospheric-state and aerosol profiles. Applied optics, 40(30), 5280–5294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, J., Cho, Y., Kim, J. and Kim, S. Y. (2020). Autonomous collision detection and avoidance for ARAGON USV: development and field tests. Journal of Field Robotics1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, W. F. and Wang, J. H. (2004). A brief analysis of the occurrence patterns and causes of sea fog along the coast of Zhejiang. Donghai Marine Science , 22(2), 4.Google Scholar
Hu, R. J. and Zhou, F. X. (1997). Numerical study on the influence of marine meteorological conditions during sea fog. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 027(003), 282–290.Google Scholar
Huang, H., Liu, H., Jiang, W. and Huang, J. (2011). Characteristics of the boundary layer structure of sea fog on the coast of southern China. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 28(6), 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, B., Gao, R. Z. and Shi, M. X. (2022). Evaluation of performance of GRAPES-TYM model for sea fog forecasting in coastal areas of eastern my country. Meteorological Science and Technology, 50(6), 783–792.Google Scholar
Huang, Z., Wang, Y., Wen, J. and Peng, W. (2023). An object detection algorithm combining semantic and geometric information of the 3D point cloud. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 56(434), 101971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juan, Y., Bo-Yan, Z. and Ji-Zhou, Y. (2015). Research on Target Attributes Fusion in Netted-Radar based on DS Evidence Theory. IET International Radar Conference 2015. IET, 1–4.Google Scholar
Kim, C. K. and Yum, S. S. (2012). A numerical study of sea-fog formation over cold sea surface using a one-dimensional turbulence model coupled with the weather research and forecasting model. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 143(3), 481–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. M. (2004). Forecasting advective sea fog with the use of classification and regression tree analyses for kunsan air base. Biblioscholar.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. M., Koračin, D. and Redmond, K. T. (2004). Sea fog research in the united kingdom and united states: a historical essay including outlook. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 85(3), 395–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P., Wang, S., Shang, Z. K. and TianYi, H. (2012). Visibility forecast in Beijing based on neural network hierarchical classification modeling. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 48(3), 52–57.Google Scholar
Li, Z.-X., Wang, Y.-L., Peng, C. and Peng, Y. (2022). Laplace dark channel attenuation-based single image defogging in ocean scenes. Transducer and Microsystem, 82(14), 21535–21559.Google Scholar
Liao, Q. F., Liu, Q., Li, B. X. and Zhan, J. (2019). Atmospheric horizontal visibility measurement method based on CCD. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 36(2), 226–230.Google Scholar
Los Angeles / Long Beach Harbor Safety Committee. (2022). Harbor safety plan for the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. Marine Exchange of Southern California.Google Scholar
Lu, Z., Zheng, C. and Yang, T. (2020). Application of offshore visibility forecast based on temporal convolutional network and transfer learning. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2020, 8882279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, Z., Wen, J. and Liang, X. (2013). Video Image Clarity Algorithm Research of USV Visual System under the Sea Fog. Advances in Swarm Intelligence: 4th International Conference, ICSI 2013, Harbin, China, June 12–15, 2013, Proceedings, Part II 4. Springer, 436–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marine department the government of the Hong Kong special administrative region (2012). Safe Navigation In Restricted Visibility. Marine department the government of the Hong Kong special administrative region.Google Scholar
Park, J., Lee, Y. J., Jo, Y., Kim, J., Han, J. H., Kim, K. J., Kim, Y. T. and Kim, S. B. (2022). Spatio-temporal network for sea fog forecasting. Sustainability, 14(23), 16163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, W., Pan, J., Zhang, H. and Cao, X. (2020). Single image dehazing via multi-scale convolutional neural networks with holistic edges. International Journal of Computer Vision, 128, 240–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rong, S. and Lee, C.-H. (2021). Micro mie scattering lidar for fog visibility measurement. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (Natural Science), 27(1), 208–213.Google Scholar
Ryu, H.-S. and Hong, S. (2020). Sea fog detection based on normalized difference snow index using advanced Himawari imager observations. Remote Sensing, 12(9), 1521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sang, T.-H., Tsai, S. Y. and Yu, T. P. (2020). Mitigating effects of uniform fog on SPAD lidars. IEEE Sensors Letters, 4(9), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasa, K. and Hibino, T. (2006). An Analytic Study on Weather Parameters Related to Restricted Visibility Due to Heavy Fog at Geiyo District in Seto Inland Sea. ISOPE International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference.Google Scholar
Satat, G., Tancik, M. and Raskar, R. (2018). Towards Photography through Realistic Fog. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP), 4(9), 1–10.Google Scholar
Sen, W., Yuzhai, P., Yi, L., Baosen, Y. and Shiliang, Q. (2013). Image quality improvement of laser active imaging in fog. Infrared and Laser, 42(9), 99–103.Google Scholar
Silverman, J. (2020). Signal-Processing Algorithms for Display and Enhancement of IR Images. Infrared Technology XIX, 2020(1993).Google Scholar
Simsir, U., Amasyalí, M. F., Bal, M., Çelebi, U. B. and Ertugrul, S. (2014). Decision support system for collision avoidance of vessels. Applied Soft Computing, 25, 369–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorial, M., Mouawad, I., Simetti, E. and Odone, F. (2019). Towards a Real Time Obstacle Detection System for Unmanned Surface Vehicles. Oceans 2019 MTS/IEEE Seattle. IEEE, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stateczny, A., Kazimierski, W., Burdziakowski, P., Motyl, W. and Wisniewska, M. (2019). Shore construction detection by automotive radar for the needs of autonomous surface vehicle navigation. International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(2), 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoelinga, M. T. and Warner, T. T. (1999). Nonhydrostatic, mesobeta-scale model simulations of cloud ceiling and visibility for an east coast winter precipitation event. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 38(4), 385–404.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, L., Yan, M. and Yin, Y. (2016). Small Surface Target Detection Algorithm based on Panoramic Vision. 2016 35th Chinese Control Conference (CCC). IEEE, 3967–3972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, L., Zhou, N. and Liu, Z. (2016). On the Small Ship Target Dstection based on Panormaic Vision. Procrrdings of the 32nd Chinese Control Conference, 38(4).Google Scholar
Sun, H., Wang, Y., Cai, X. and Bai, X. (2023). Vipformer: Efficient Vision-and-Pointcloud Transformer for Unsupervised Pointcloud Understanding. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 7234–7242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tianjin Maritime Safety Administration. (2023). Tianjin maritime safety administration ship traffic management system safety supervision and management rules. Tianjin Maritime Safety Administration.Google Scholar
Van Nguyen, T., Mai, T. T. N. and Lee, C. (2021). Single maritime image defogging based on illumination decomposition using texture and structure priors. IEEE Access, 9, 34590–34603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, B., Dong, L., Zhao, M., Houde, W. and Ji, Y. (2015). An infrared maritime target detection algorithm applicable to heavy sea fog. Infrared Physics and Technology, 71, 56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., Wang, N., Tang, L. and Wu, W. (2022). Marine Vessel Detection in Sea Fog Environment based on SSD. International Conference on Sensor Systems and Software, 2022.Google Scholar
Wang, C., Fan, B., Li, Y., Min, L., Zhang, J. and Chen, J. (2023). Study on the classification perception and visibility enhancement of ship navigation environments in foggy conditions. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(7), 1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, R. G. (2019). Transnav: intelligent autonomous ship navigation using multi-sensor modalities. TransNav the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 13(3), 503–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, D., Lu, B., Zhang, T. and Yan, F. (2015). A method of detecting sea fogs using CALIOP data and its application to improve modis-based sea fog detection. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Transfer, Radiative, 153(1), 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, X. F., Yu, A. A., Ren, Y. and Jing, H. (2022). Observation accuracy analysis of sea fog monitoring system based on Lora in Zhangzhou. Straits Science, 8, 7.Google Scholar
Xiang, Y., Zhang, Q. and Wang, M. (2023). Intelligent model for offshore China sea fog forecasting. arXiv preprint arXiv:.10580.Google Scholar
Xie, C. B., Han, Y. and Zhou, J. (2005). Mobile lidar for visibility measurement. High Power Laser and Particle, 17(7), 971–975.Google Scholar
Xie, S., Chu, X., Liu, S. and Wu, Q. (2016). A review and prospect of ship intelligent collision avoidance system. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 1, 9.Google Scholar
Xing, H., Cui, Y., Wang, Z., Xiong, W. and Jiang, B. (2017). Vessel Detection and Classification Fusing Radar and Vision Data. 2017 Seventh International Conference on Information Science and Technology, 2017.Google Scholar
Xing, R., Zhang, Y. and Yang, L. (2020). Research on defogging algorithm for foggy images at night. Electronic Measurement Technology, 30(24), 127–131.Google Scholar
Xing, H., Cui, Y., Wang, Z., Xiong, W. and Jiang, B. (2024). Target detection algorithm for ships at sea under complex sea conditions. Modern Defence Technology (4), 18–27.Google Scholar
Zhang, J.-L. (2021). Research on cooperative navigation and positioning method for marine vessels with internet of things technology. Ship Science and Technology, 43(022), 106–108.Google Scholar
Zhang, H. G. and Ai, W. Z. (2016). Safety countermeasures for ships in fog navigation. Shipping Management, 38(7), 4.Google Scholar
Zhang, X.-Y., Jia, L. and Zhu, J. (2018). Comparison of laser ranging system based on SNSPD and SPAD detector. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2018(21), 378–384.Google Scholar
Zhang, B. S., Yang, Y., Chen, G. and Technologies, (2018). Dehazing algorithm combining histogram equalization and dark channel prior. Transducer and Microsystem, 37(3), 5.Google Scholar
Zhen, G. (2022). Discussion on the safe navigation methods of ships in waters with poor visibility. China Water Transport (4), 18–20.Google Scholar
Zheng, Q., Yang, L., Xie, Y., Song, C. and Xu, Z. (2020). A target detection scheme with decreased complexity and enhanced performance for range-doppler FMCW radar. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 70(12), 1–13.Google Scholar