Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T00:28:11.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Refined Collision Risk Model for Oceanic Flight Under Longitudinal Distance-Based Separation in ADS-C Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2014

Ryota Mori
Ryota Mori*
Affiliation:
(Electronic Navigation Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan)
*
(E-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Currently, the 30 nautical mile (nm) minimum longitudinal separation standard is applied on oceanic routes under the Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Contract (ADS-C) environment. However, the periodic position report should be provided at least every ten minutes in Japanese airspace based on previous safety analysis. The position report is usually sent via satellite connection, so less frequent position reports would reduce connection costs by airlines. Since the previous safety analysis estimates the risk of collision conservatively, this paper proposes a refinement of the collision risk model by considering the dependency between two closely separated aircraft. The result shows that the periodic position report interval can be extended without infringing safety.

Keywords

Safety analysisOceanic flightLongitudinal separationStatistics
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 67 , Issue 5 , September 2014 , pp. 845 - 868
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, D. and Lin, X.G. (1996). A Collision Risk Model for a Crossing Track Separation Methodology. The Journal of Navigation, 49-3, 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D. (2005). A Collision Risk Model Based On Reliability Theory That Allows For Unequal RNP Navigation Accuracy. ICAO SASP-WG/WHL/7, WP20.Google Scholar
Australia. (2000). An Extended Methodology for ADS Longitudinal Separation Standards. ICAO RGCSP/10, WP/07.Google Scholar
Barry, S. and Aldis, G. (2013). Additional Information on Collision Risk Calculations for Oceanic RNP2 with Allowance for Observed Navigation Performance and Mach Restrictions. ICAO SASP-WG/WHL/23, WP02.Google Scholar
Civil Aviation Bureau, Japan. (2010). CARATS (Collaborative Actions for Rennovation of Air Traffic Systems) Long-term Vision for the Future Air Traffic Systems. http://www.mlit.go.jp/common/000128185.pdf. Accessed 16 January 2014.Google Scholar
Daly, H. (2012). Longitudinal Collision Risk Estimates under the NAT RLongSM Operational Trial. ICAO SASP-WG/WHL/21 WP/29.Google Scholar
Fujita, M., Nagaoka, S. and Amai, O. (2006). Safety Assessment prior to Implementation of 50 NM Longitudinal Separation Minimum in R220 and R580. ICAO SASP-WG/WHL/9 WP/14.Google Scholar
Fujita, M. (2008). Safety Assessment prior to 30NM Longitudinal Separation Minimum under ADS-C Environment. ICAO SASP-WG/WHL/13 IP/08.Google Scholar
Hsu, D.A. (1981). The Evaluation of Aircraft Collision Probabilities at Intersecting Air Routes. The Journal of Navigation, 34-1, 78–102.Google Scholar
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2007). Procedures for Air Navigation Service - Air Traffic Management (PANS-ATM). Doc 4444.Google Scholar
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2008). PBN manual. Doc 9613.Google Scholar
International Civil Aviation Organization Asia and Pacific Office (ICAO APAC). (2010). Asia/Pacific Region En-route Monitoring Agency (EMA) Handbook. http://www.icao.int/APAC/Documents/edocs/EMA_handbook_ver2.pdf. Accessed 19 December 2013.Google Scholar
Mori, R. (2011). Safety Assessment for Reduced Time-Based Separation Minima on Oceanic Routes. Journal of Mechanical Systems for Transportation and Logistics, 4·1, 39–49.Google Scholar
Mori, R. (2012). Improved Calculation Method for Risk Analysis of Longitudinal Time Separation. ICAO SASP-WG/WHL/21, IP/06.Google Scholar
NAT. (2013). North Atlantic Operations and Airspace Manual, NAT Doc 007.Google Scholar
NATSPG. (1978). Summaries of Discussions and Conclusions of the North Atlantic Systems Planning Group, France NATSPG 14.Google Scholar
Reich, P.G. (1966). Analysis of Long-range Air Traffic Systems: Separation Standards. The Journal of Navigation, 19, 88–98. 169–186, 331–347.Google Scholar
RTCA SC-170. (1992). Minimum Operational Performance Standards for Airborne Automatic Dependent Surveillance (ADS) Equipment. RTCA/DO-212.Google Scholar
Smith, P., Hutton, G., Martin, E. and Arnold, T. (2012). Reduced Longitudinal Separation Minimum, Extended Collision Risk Modelling for Periodic Reporting, NATS LTIP Report 4107/RPT/11.Google Scholar
United States of America (PARMO). (2012). Safety Assessment to Support Use of 30 nm Lateral and 30 nm Longitudinal Separation Standards in Anchorage Oceanic and Offshore Airspace. ICAO RASMAG/16, WP/24.Google Scholar