Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:56:09.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potential Benefits of GPS/GLONASS/GALILEO Integration in an Urban Canyon – Hong Kong

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2010

Shengyue Ji ,
Wu Chen ,
Xiaoli Ding ,
Yongqi Chen ,
Chunmei Zhao  and
Congwei Hu
Shengyue Ji
Affiliation:
(Hong Kong Polytechnic University)
Wu Chen
Affiliation:
(Hong Kong Polytechnic University)
Xiaoli Ding
Affiliation:
(Hong Kong Polytechnic University)
Yongqi Chen
Affiliation:
(Hong Kong Polytechnic University)
Chunmei Zhao
Affiliation:
(Chinese Academy of Surveying & Mapping)
Congwei Hu*
Affiliation:
(Tongji University)
*
(Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With the existing GPS, the replenishment of GLONASS and the launching of Galileo there will be three satellite navigation systems in the future, with a total of more than 80 satellites. So it can be expected that the performance of the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) will be greatly improved, especially in urban environments. This paper studies the potential benefits of GPS/GLONASS/Galileo integration in an urban canyon – Hong Kong. The navigation performances of four choices (GPS alone, GPS+GLONASS, GPS+Galileo and GPS+GLONASS+Galileo) are evaluated in terms of availability, coverage, and continuity based on simulation. The results show that there are significant improvements in availability, coverage and continuity, by using GPS+GLONASS+Galileo compared with the other choices. But the performance is still not good enough for most navigation applications in urban environments.

Keywords

GPSGLONASSGALILEOUrban canyons
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 63 , Issue 4 , October 2010 , pp. 681 - 693
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berefelt, F., Boberg, B., Nygårds, J., Strömbäck, P. and Wirkander, S.-L. (2004). Collaborative GPS/INS Navigation in Urban Environment. Proceedings of National Technical Meeting 2004, San Diego, California, January, 1114–1125.Google Scholar
Chen, W. and Ochieng, W. Y. (2000). Galileo – European Global Navigation Satellite System. Journal of Geospatial Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 2, 15–20.Google Scholar
Grejner-Brzezinska, D. A., Yi, Y. and Toth, C. K. (2001). Bridging GPS Gaps in Urban Canyons: The Benefits of ZUPT'S. The Journal of Navigation, 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozlov, D. and Tkachenko, M. (1998). Centimeter-Level Real Time Kinematics Positioning with GPS+GLONASS C/A Receivers. The Journal of Navigation 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuusniemi, Heidi, Leppäkoski, H., Syrjärinne, J. and Takala, J. (2002). “Fault Detection and Isolation in High-Sensitivity Assisted GPS”. ION GPS 2002. 2587–2595.Google Scholar
Mooney, F. W. (1985). “Terrestrial Evaluation of the GPS Standard Positioning Service”. The Journal of Navigation 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, L., Bartlett, S, Peterson, B. and McKaughan, M. (1995). “Evaluation of Radionavigation Systems in an Urban Environment” NTM 1995. 293-302.Google Scholar
Malicorne, M. (2001) “Galileo Performance Improvement for Urban Users”. Proceeding of 14th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, Salt Lake City, Utah, September, 2105–2113.Google Scholar
O'Keefe, K. (2001). “Availability and Reliability Advantages of GPS/Galileo Integration”. Proceeding of 14th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, Salt Lake City, Utah, September, 2096–2104.Google Scholar
Ochieng, W. Y., Sauer, K., Cross, P. A., Sheridan, K. F.Iliffe, J.Lannelongue, S.Ammour, N. and Petit, K. (2001). Potential Performance Levels of a Combined Galileo/GPS Navigation System. The Journal of Navigation 54, 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, S. and Lachapelle, G. (2000) Impact of GPS/Galileo Integration on Marine Navigation. IAIN World Congress. ION Annual Meeting. 721–731.Google Scholar
Romay Merino, M. M., Gavín Alarcón, A. J., Juárez Villares, I., and Herráiz Monseco, E. (2001). “An Integrated GNSS Concept, Galileo and GPS, Benefits in Terms of Accuracy, Integrity, Availability and Continuity”. Proceeding of 14th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, Salt Lake City, Utah, September, 2114–2124Google Scholar
Tsakiri, M., Kelay, A. and Stewart, M. (1999). “Urban Canyon vehicle navigation with Integrated GPS/GLONASS/DR Systems”. The Journal of Navigation, 46Google Scholar
Vrhovski, D., Moore, T. and Bennett, L. (2004). GNSS-based Road User Charging. The Journal of Navigation 57, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youjing, C. and Ge, S. S. (2003). “Autonomous Vehicle Positioning With GPS in Urban Canyon Environments”. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 19, No. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burtch, Bob (2001). “Coordinates, Datum and Transformations”, website at http://users.netonecom.net/~rburtch/geodesy/datum.htmlGoogle Scholar
Husson, V. (2000) GLONASS, webpage at http://ilrs.gsfc.nasa.gov/ilrs/glonass.html.Google Scholar
McDonald, K. D. (2002). “The Modernization of GPS: Plans, New Capabilities and the Future Relationship to Galileo”. Journal of Global Positioning Systems (2002) Vol. 1, No. 1: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, W (1993). “Engineering Surveying, Fourth Edition”. Butterworth-Heinmann.Google Scholar
Wolfrum, J. M. Healey, Provenzano, J.-P. and Sassorossi, T. (1999). “Galileo – Europé's Space-based Navigation Infrastructure”. Proceedings of GNSS 99, Genova, Italy, October 5–8, 59–64.Google Scholar