Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:28:43.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Linguistic Approach to Marine Communication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

M. A. Bakr
M. A. Bakr
Affiliation:
(University of Wales Institute of Science and Technology)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Numerous collisions over the years have emphasized the need for rapid and efficient ship-to-ship voice communication systems. Such systems, set up to satisfy the demand for more and better channels through which messages can be sent, should guarantee that both sender and receiver come to share the same thoughts and feelings. ‘It can be said that two expressions have the same meaning if their utterance results in the same change of behaviour.’ Recognizing that voice communication systems cannot be effective until all parties speak and understand the same ‘language’, the Maritime Safety Committee of IMCO has developed the Standard Marine Navigational Vocabulary, a significant landmark in the attempt to achieve the maximum safety to navigation and the most appropriate conduct of ships at sea. This paper will concentrate on the objectives of the Vocabulary and will try to ascertain if such objectives have been achieved. The analysis will emphasize the viewpoint of ‘non-English speaking people’ using English ‘for the interchange of intelligence between individuals of all maritime nations’, and will take linguistic considerations into account.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , May 1979 , pp. 171 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Glen, E. S. (1966). Meaning and behaviour; communication and culture. Journal of Communication, 16 (4), 248.Google Scholar
2Darbyshire, A. E. (1967). A Description of English. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
3 (1974). UWIST Lectures on Technical Communication. Cardiff, pp. 25–32.Google Scholar
4Wason, P. (1972). Are there rules for writing English? UWIST Lectures on Technical Communication.Google Scholar
5Kirkman, J. (1974). Models of the communication process. UWIST Lectures on Technical Communication.Google Scholar
6Kirkman, J. (1973). Effective English for technical literature. Journal of the Swedish Academy for Engineering Sciences, IV A, 44, 3.Google Scholar
7Kirkman, J. (1967). Command of vocabulary among university entrants. Educational Research, 9, 2.Google Scholar
8Thorndike and Large (1959). The Teacher's Word Book of 30,000 Words. New York.Google Scholar
9Smith, L. S. (1921). Society for Pure English' Tracts, vol. XII.Google Scholar
10Sinclair, J. (1972). A Course in Spoken English: Grammar, p. 265. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar