Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T04:14:41.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interpreting Astro-position Lines at Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 1962

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

‘The mark of a good navigator is not so much his ability to obtain accurate information as his ability to evaluate and interpret correctly the information available to him.’ So writes Captain Alton B. Moody, U.S.N.R. in the course of an interesting correspondence in the February number of the U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings. In the August 1961 number (page 132) Captain Robert Lee Rhoads, Jr., a shipmaster, suggests that the ‘cartwheel’ set of astro-sights, where four position-lines intersect each other at angles of about 45°, is inferior to the square where the position-lines intersect at approximately 90°, which gives a more reliable fix. One of Captain Rhoads's illustrations shows a case of a 4-minute systematic error in a ‘cartwheel’ fix giving a position 6 miles in error, where the same error would have had no effect on the position interpolated from four sights taken at 90° to each other.

Type
Forum
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1962

References

Tonta, L., (1931). Accurate determination of the position at sea. Hydr. Rep., 8, 33.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. W., (1952). The treatment of navigational errors. This Journal, 5, 103.Google Scholar
Parker, J. B., (1952). The treatment of simultaneous position data in the air. This Journal, 5, 235.Google Scholar
Bini, M., (1955). The use of bisectors in selecting the most probable position. This Journal, 8, 195.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. W., and Parker, J. B., (1956). Observational errors. This Journal, 9, 105.Google Scholar