Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T00:28:09.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improving DGPS Accuracy by Considering the Correlation of Pseudorange Correction and Satellite Elevation Angle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2017

Sang-Hyeon Kim  and
Kwan-Dong Park
Sang-Hyeon Kim
Affiliation:
(Department of Geoinformatic Engineering, Inha University, South Korea)
Kwan-Dong Park*
Affiliation:
(Department of Geoinformatic Engineering, Inha University, South Korea)
*
(E-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the limitations of Differential Global Positioning Systems (DGPS) is that accuracy decreases as the distance between the user and a base station increases. We have developed a new DGPS positioning strategy that is less affected by baseline length and enables better accuracy. We found correlations between satellite elevation angle and Pseudo-Range Correction (PRC) through extensive tests. As a result, better PRC values were obtained by considering differences in satellite elevation angles at a reference site and the user location. We tested the model for a variety of baseline lengths greater than 250 km, and the positioning accuracy improved by 29–66% compared with traditional DGPS based on a single reference station. Positioning accuracies comparable to those of multi-reference DGPS were achieved in some cases.

Keywords

GPSDGPSPseudo-Range CorrectionElevation Angle
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 70 , Issue 6 , November 2017 , pp. 1267 - 1275
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bakuła, M. (2007). Static Network Code DGPS Positioning VS. Carrier Phase Single Baseline Solutions For Short Observation Time And Medium-Long Distances. Artificial Satellites, 42(3), 167–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., Lichtenegger, H. and Wasle, E. (2008). GNSS - Global Navigation Satellite Systems: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, and more. Springer Wien New York.Google Scholar
ICD-GPS-200C. (2000). GPS Interface Control Document – Navstar GPS Space Segment/Navigation User Interfaces, IRN-200C-004, 12 Apr 2000.Google Scholar
Lachapelle, G., Alves, P., Fortes, L.P. and Cannon, M.E. (2000). DGPS RTK Positioning Using a Reference Network, ION GPS-00 (Session C3), Salt Lake City, UT.Google Scholar
Misra, P. and Enge, P. (2011). GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM: Signals, Measurements, and Performance, Revised Second Edition. Ganga-Jamuna Press.Google Scholar
Monteiro, L., Moore, T. and Hill, C. (2005). What is the accuracy of DGPS?, Journal of Navigation, 58(2), 207–225.Google Scholar
Retscher, G. (2002). Accuracy Performance of Virtual Reference Station (VRS) Networks, Journal of Global Positioning Systems, 1(1), 40–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar