Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T13:16:33.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improvement of Single-Frequency GPS Positioning Performance Based on EGNOS Corrections in Algeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2020

Lahouaria Tabti ,
Salem Kahlouche ,
Belkacem Benadda  and
Bilal Beldjilali
Lahouaria Tabti*
Affiliation:
(Tlemcen Telecommunications Laboratory, Faculty of Technology, Aboubekr Belkaid University of Tlemcen, Chetouan, Algeria) (Department of Space Geodesy, Centre of Space Techniques, Algerian Space Agency, Arzew, Algeria)
Salem Kahlouche
Affiliation:
(Department of Space Geodesy, Centre of Space Techniques, Algerian Space Agency, Arzew, Algeria)
Belkacem Benadda
Affiliation:
(Tlemcen Telecommunications Laboratory, Faculty of Technology, Aboubekr Belkaid University of Tlemcen, Chetouan, Algeria)
Bilal Beldjilali
Affiliation:
(Department of Space Geodesy, Centre of Space Techniques, Algerian Space Agency, Arzew, Algeria)
*
(E-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The main objective of the European Geostationary Navigation Overlay System (EGNOS) is to improve the positioning accuracy by correcting several error sources affecting the Global Positioning System (GPS) and to provide integrity information to GPS signals for users in real time. This research presents analysis used to investigate improvement in the performance of single-frequency GPS positioning using EGNOS corrections in Algeria. In this study, we performed position measurements with two calculation approaches, the first based on GPS single-point positioning and the second using EGNOS differential corrections. Positioning accuracy was determined by comparison with the known precise coordinates of the sites; and then the improved ionospheric correction using EGNOS was investigated. The results revealed that GPS + EGNOS performance was significantly improved compared with GPS alone, when measurements of horizontal and vertical accuracy were taken into account, and that the EGNOS corrections improved east and north components slightly, and the up component significantly.

Keywords

EGNOSGPS Single-Point Positioning (SPP)AccuracyIonospheric Correction
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 73 , Issue 4 , July 2020 , pp. 846 - 860
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

De Lellis, E., Corraro, F., Ciniglio, U., Canzolino, P., Garbarino, L., Gaglione, S. and Nastro, V. (2009). An EGNOS Based Navigation System for Highly Reliable Aircraft Automatic Landing. Conference Proceedings of the European Navigation Conference (ENC), University of Naples, Italy.Google Scholar
El-Rabbani, A. (2002). Introduction to GPS, the Global Positioning System. Artech House Mobile Communications Series, second edition. Norwood: Artech House.Google Scholar
ESA. (2011). User Guide for EGNOS Application Developers. ED 2.0. Luxembourg: European Commission, Available at: https://egnos-user-support.esspsas.eu/Google Scholar
ESA. (2017). EGNOS Open Service Definition Document, OS-SDD Issue 2.3. Available at https://egnos-user-support.essp-sas.eu/new_egnos_ops/Google Scholar
ESA. (2019). EGNOS Safety of Life (SoL) Service Definition Document Issue 3.3. Available at https://egnos-user-support.essp-sas.eu/new_egnos_ops/Google Scholar
Eurocontrol. (2003). Technical Notes on SBAS; DocNo: PEG-TN-SBAS, Issue: I, Project: PEGASUS.Google Scholar
Ge, Y., Zhou, F., Sun, B., Wang, S. and Shi, B. (2017). The impact of satellite time group delay and inter-frequency differential code bias corrections on multi-GNSS combined positioning. Sensors, 17(3), 602.10.3390/s17030602CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurtner, W. (2007). RINEX: The Receiver Independent Exchange Format Version 2.11. Boulder: UNAVCO. Available at: https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/CORS/RINEX211.txtGoogle Scholar
Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., Lichtenegger, H. and Wasle, E. (2008). GNSS – Global Navigation Satellite Systems GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, and More. Vienna and NewYork: Springer.Google Scholar
Ibáñez, D., Rovira-García, A., Sanz, J., Juan, J. M., Gonzalez-Casado, G., Jimenez-Baños, D., López-Echazarreta, C. and Lapin, I. (2018). The GNSS Laboratory Tool Suite (gLAB) Updates: SBAS, DGNSS and Global Monitoring System. 9th ESA Workshop on Satellite Navigation Technologies (NAVITEC), Noordwijk, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Jimenez-Banos, D., Matthew, P., AnkitRaj, M., Felix, T., Didier, F. and Chatre, E. (2011). EGNOS Open Service Guidelines for Receiver Manufacturers. Proceedings of the 24th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS), Portland, OR, 2505–2512.Google Scholar
Jin, S. G., Jin, R. and Li, D. (2016). Assessment of BeiDou differential code bias variations from multi-GNSS network observations, journal of European Geosciences Union (EGU). Annales Geophys, 34, 259–269. Available at: www.ann-geophys.net/34/259/2016/ 10.5194/angeo-34-259-2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahlouche, S., Touam, S. and Anzidei, M. (1998). Integration of GPS Algerian sites in west Mediterranean geodynamical studies - case of TYRGEONET project. In: Geodesy on the Move. International Association of Geodesy Journal, 119, 425–430.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E. D. and Hegarty, C. J. (2006). Understanding GPS Principles and Applications, International Standard Book Number: 1-58053-894-0, second edition. Boston/London: Artech house.Google Scholar
Krasuski, K. (2017). Application of the GPS/EGNOS solution for the precise positioning of an aircraft vehicle. Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology. Series Transport. 96.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Chen, R., Chen, Y., Kröger, T. and Pei, L. (2012). Performance evaluation of EGNOS in challenging environments. Journal of Global Positioning Systems, 11(1), 145–155.10.5081/jgps.11.2.145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z., Lia, Y., Guoa, J. and Lia, F. (2016). Influence of higher-order ionospheric delay correction on GPS precise orbit determination and precise positioning. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 7(5), 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, Z., Zhou, P., Liu, F., Wang, Z. and Gao, Y. (2019). Evaluation of orbit, clock and ionospheric corrections from five currently available SBAS L1 services: methodology and analysis. Remote Sensing, 11(4), 411. Available at: www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing 10.3390/rs11040411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rovira-Garcia, A., Juan, J. M., Sanz, J., González-Casado, G. and Ibáñez, D. (2015). Accuracy of ionospheric models used in GNSS and SBAS: methodology and analysis. Journal of Geodesy, 90, 229–240.10.1007/s00190-015-0868-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RTCA. (2001). Minimum Operational Performance Standards for Global Positioning System/Wide Area Augmentation System Airborne Equipment. Washington, DC 20036. Supersedes DO-229B.Google Scholar
Sanz, J., Juan Zornoza, J. M. and Hernández-Pajares, M. (2013). GNSS Data Processing, Volume I: Fundamentals and Algorithms. European Space Agency, the Netherlands. ISBN 978-92-9221-886-7.Google Scholar
Sauer, K. (2003). Integrated high precision kinematic positioning using GPS and EGNOS observations. Ph.D. thesis, University of London, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Su, K., Jin, S. and Hoque, M. M. (2019). Evaluation of ionospheric delay effects on multi-GNSS positioning performance. Remote Sensing, 11, 171. Available at: www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing 10.3390/rs11020171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabti, L., Kahlouche, S. and Benadda, B. (2018). Improving availability of the EGNOS system in Algeria for dual frequency. Coordinates Magazine, XIV(1), 36–40.Google Scholar
Walter, T., Blanch, J. and Enge, P. (2012). L1/L5 SBAS MOPS to Support Multiple Constellations. Proceedings of the 25th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division. Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS), Nashville, TN, 1287–1297.Google Scholar
Zahidul, M., Bhuiyan, H., Kuusniemi, H., Soderini, A., Honkala, S. and Marila, S. (2017). Performance of EGNOS in North-East European Latitudes, Proceedings of the 2017 International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, Monterey, California, January 2017, 627–636. https://doi.org/10.33012/2017.14881CrossRefGoogle Scholar