Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T20:38:37.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of the Capability of Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast to Meet the Requirements of Future Airborne Surveillance Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Busyairah Syd Ali ,
Wolfgang Schuster  and
Washington Yotto Ochieng
Busyairah Syd Ali*
Affiliation:
(University of Malaya, Malaysia)
Wolfgang Schuster
Affiliation:
(Imperial College London)
Washington Yotto Ochieng
Affiliation:
(Imperial College London)
*
(E-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B) Out supports various ground applications including Air Traffic Control (ATC) surveillance in radar airspace, non-radar airspace and on the airport surface. In addition, the capability of aircraft to receive ADS-B Out messages from other aircraft within their coverage (ADS-B In) enables enhanced airborne surveillance applications. The requirements of the application vary depending on its safety-criticality. More stringent applications will require higher levels of performance. It is therefore critical that the ADS-B system performance is measured against the most stringent application it is designed for. This paper reviews the various enhanced airborne surveillance applications and the required ADS-B information to support them. It identifies the ADS-B based applications required for Air Traffic Management (ATM) modernisation under the SESAR/NextGen programs. It discusses existing ADS-B Out versions and their capabilities. A mapping exercise is undertaken to assess the credibility of the ADS-B system performance to support the functionalities and requirements of the various enhanced airborne surveillance applications and establish those that require further research and development, highlighting some of the key challenges.

Keywords

ADS-BAirborne surveillanceATSAWPerformance requirements
Type
Review Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 70 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 49 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ali, B.S., Schuster, W., Ochieng, W., Chiew, T.K. and Majumdar, A. (2013). Framework for ADS-B Performance Assessment: the London TMA Case Study. Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 61(1), 39–52.Google Scholar
Ali, B.S., Schuster, W., Ochieng, W. and Majumdar, A. (2015). Analysis of anomalies in ADS-B and its GPS data. GPS Solutions [Online], Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10291-015-0453-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barmore, B., Penhallegon, W.J., Weitz, L.A., Bone, R.S., Levitt, I., Flores, J.A., Kriegsfeld, D.A. and Johnson, W.C. (2016). Interval Management: Development and Implementation of an Airborne Spacing Concept. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. San Diego, California, USA.Google Scholar
CASCADE Operational Focus Group. (2008). Use of ADS-B for Enhanced Application of Own Visual Separation by Flight Crew on Approach (ATSA-VSA). In: EUROCONTROL (ed.) 1·0 ed.Google Scholar
CASCADE Operational Focus Group. (2009). Use of ADS-B for Enhanced Traffic Situational Awareness by Flight Crew During Flight Operations – Airborne Surveillance (ATSA-AIRB). EUROCONTROL.Google Scholar
EUROCAE. (2011). Safety Performance and Interoperability Requirements for Flight Deck Interval Management (ASPA-FIM). ED-195.Google Scholar
EUROCAE and RTCA. (2010). Safety Performance and Interoperability Requirements for ATSAW during light operations (ATSAW-AIRB). ED-164 /DO-319.Google Scholar
EUROCONTROL. (2009). CRISTAL-ITP Project. In: EUROCONTROL (ed.) CASCADE Programme.Google Scholar
EUROCONTROL. (2016). European ATM Master Plan [Online]. EUROCONTROL. Available: https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/data/projects/19074 [Accessed 20 May 2016].Google Scholar
FAA. (2010). Concept of Operations for the Next Generation Air Transportation System. In: Joint Planning And Development Office (ed.) v3·2.Google Scholar
FAA. (2012). NextGen Implementation Plan [Online]. FAA. Available: https://www.faa.gov/nextgen/media/NextGen_Implementation_Plan-2015.pdf [Accessed 27 May 2016].Google Scholar
ICAO. (2006). Procedures for Air Navigation Services – Aircraft Operations (PAN-OPS). Doc 8168 OPS/611. 5 ed.Google Scholar
ICAO. (2007). Air Traffic Management. In: ICAO (ed.) 5th ed. Google Scholar
ICAO. (2012a). Manual on Airborne Surveillance Applications. Doc 9994 AN/496.Google Scholar
ICAO. (2012b). Report to the Conference on General Portion. Twelfth Air Navigation Conference. Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Rekkas, C. (2013). Progress of WAM, ADS-B Out and ATSAW deployment in Europe. In: German Institute Of Navigation (ed.) International Symposium on Enhanced Solutions for Aircraft and Vehicle Surveillance Applications (ESAVS). Berlin Germany.Google Scholar
RTCA. (2003). Minimum Operational Performance Standards For 1090 Mhz Extended Squitter Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B). DO-260.Google Scholar
RTCA. (2008). Safety, Performance and Interoperability Requirements Document for the In-Trail Procedure in Oceanic Airspace (ATSA-ITP) Application. DO-312.Google Scholar
SESAR. (2012). European ATM Master Plan [Online]. EUROCONTROL. Available: http://www.eurocontrol.int/publications/european-atm-master-plan-edition-2-roadmap-sustainable-air-traffic-management [Accessed 20 May 2016].Google Scholar
Vidal, L. (2010). ADS-B IN-ATSAW (Airborne Traffic Situational Awareness). CAAC-Thales ADS-B Flight Operation Seminar. Beijing.Google Scholar
Vidal, L. (2012). Airborne Traffic Situational Awareness. In: ICAO (ed.) ADS-B Study and Implementation Task Force. Jeju: Airbus.Google Scholar
Wing, D.J. (2015). Achieving TASAR Operational Readiness. 15th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. Dallas, Texas, US.Google Scholar