Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:27:21.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Costs and Benefits of Air Navigation and Control Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

J. B. Heath
J. B. Heath
Affiliation:
(Board of Trade)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is no doubt that the increasing size and speed of aircraft, and in particular the continuing growth in air traffic movements, pose unique problems for the development and use of efficient and safe methods of air navigation and control. The scientific, technological and operational difficulties involved are, of course, quite fundamental. This paper, however, is based on the propositions that such technological opportunities and regulatory systems as may be developed necessarily affect directly or indirectly the use of real resources; and insofar as these resources have a value in alternative uses, they incur costs on the community (as well as prospectively providing benefits). Situations involving economic choice, therefore, necessarily are involved. Air navigation and control systems are not immune from the general objective of achieving an efficient overall distribution of national resources.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , January 1971 , pp. 71 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1United Kingdom Provisional Operating Requirements for All Weather Operations Category II. (1969). Board of Trade. CAP 321, H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
2Dawson, R. F. F., (1967). Cost of Road Accidents in Great Britain. Road Research Laboratory, Report LR 79.Google Scholar
3Papers and Proceedings. (1969). Vol. 8, Part 2, Sect. 2. Commission of the Third London Airport, H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
4Baxter, J. R. (1967). Present trends in research towards all-weather landing for civil aircraft. J. of R. Ae. Soc. June 1967.Google Scholar
5Papers and Proceedings (1970). Vol. 7, Part 2. Commission on the Third London Airport. H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
6Grossfield, K. and Heath, J. B. (1966). The benefit and cost of government support for research and development: a case study. Econ. J., September, 1966.Google Scholar
7Carlin, A. and Park, R. E. (1969). The Efficient Use of Airport Runway Capacity in Time of Scarcity. Prepared for the Port of New York Authority by the RAND Corporation, August 1969.Google Scholar
8Levine, M. E. (1969). Landing fees and the airport congestion problem. J. of Law and Econ., April 1969.Google Scholar
9Yance, J. V. (1969). Movement time as a cost in airport operations. J. of Trans. Econ. and Policy, January 1969.Google Scholar