Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-21T07:40:41.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Collision Avoidance Manoeuvres in Restricted Visibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1976

M. J. Barratt
Affiliation:
(National Physical Laboratory)

Extract

Circumstances of collision. Over a fourteen-year period more than 80 per cent of all collisions in the Dover Strait occurred in reduced visibility. The majority of the ships concerned were carrying radar, so a possible inference is that the information available from this source is less effective than direct vision in successfully resolving close-quarters situations. The introduction of the Imco recommended routing scheme, the support measures mounted from the two sides of the Channel and sustained improvements in navigation have together led to a significant reduction in the number of collisions in poor visibility. However the risks, though reduced, remain higher than in good visibility.

The circumstances leading to collision are very rarely known reliably or in any detail, but such facts as are known can be helpful if treated with caution. Reference 1 gives details of manoeuvres preceding 47 collisions, nearly all in fog, where helm orders were noted in crew reports (Table 1). About three-quarters of these collisions (and of collisions as a whole) occurred when ships were on opposing courses, as defined by their ports of call.

Type
‘Two Centuries of Navigation’
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Brown, I. S. H. and Wheatley, J. H. W. ‘Circumstances of collisions and strandings in the Dover Strait area 1958–1971’. NPL Report Mar Sci R 101.Google Scholar
2Imco, Ship's Routing, London 1973.Google Scholar
3Shipway, J. C. and Bowdidge, I. D. ‘Trends in collision data for the Dover Strait area 1960–1974’. NPL Report Mar Sci R 122.Google Scholar
4Barratt, M. J. and Hewson, C. M. T. ‘Ship encounters and flow in selected areas of the Dover Strait’. NPL Report Mar Sci R 117.Google Scholar
5Marks, B. L.‘Air traffic control separation standards and collision risk‘. Royal Aircraft Establishment Tech Note. Math 91.Google Scholar
6Parker, J. B.‘The effect of uncertainties on the collision problem’. This Journal 16, 414.Google Scholar
7Meteorological Office, Ships' code and decode book. Met. O. J09 HMSO.Google Scholar
8Imco, International regulations for preventing collisions at sea, 1960.Google Scholar
9Barratt, M. J.‘Encounter rates in a marine traffic separation scheme’. This Journal, 26, 458.Google Scholar