Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:25:13.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Backstaff and the Determination of Latitude at Sea in the Seventeenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

Extract

In a previous paper the writer considered the problems of establishing latitude at sea in the sixteenth century and in part based his conclusions on the results of experiments made with modern replicas of the quadrant, the mariner's astrolabe and in particular the cross-staff, these being the instruments in use at the time. Reference was made to the backstaff or Davis quadrant which, though first described by John Davis in its simplest form in 1595 was not in effective use in its final version until well into the seventeenth century. It remained, together with the cross-staff, the principal altitude-measuring instrument in use at sea until the introduction of instruments of reflection in the eighteenth century and indeed continued in use long after that time, no doubt because it was cheaper than the new instruments, but perhaps also in part because of the ingrained conservatism of seafarers. The name ‘backstaff’ can be used generically to refer to all those instruments with which the observer turns his back on the Sun (e.g. the Gunter's bow), but they all post-dated and derived in concept from the Davis quadrant, which remained the most common in England and elsewhere. (The French knew it as le quartier anglais.) It is in this sense that the term is used here.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 See Forty, G. (1983). Sources of latitude error in English sixteenth century navigation. This Journal, 36, 388.Google Scholar
2Davis, J.(1595). The Seamans Secrets, London.Google Scholar
3Ravenhill, W. (1982). The Lizard as a landfall. This Journal, 35, 75.Google Scholar
4Thrower, N. J. W.(1981). Editor. The Three Voyages of Edmond Halley in the Paramore, 16981701. London: The Hakluyt Society.Google Scholar
5See Forty, G. (1983). Op. cit.Google Scholar
6Cotter, C. H. (1983). A History of the Navigator's Sextant, Glasgow.Google Scholar
7See Forty, G. (1983). Op. cit.Google Scholar
8 Details of the three backstaves are as follows: No. S 97 by Beni Macey, 1720. No. S 99 by Wm. Wright and Bristol,c. 1720–30. No. S 119 by Will. Garner for Oliver Thompson, 1734.Google Scholar
9Fournier, G.(1643). Hydrographie, Paris, Cit. Schück, A. (1896) Der Jacobstab, Munich.(The latter is a valuable and comprehensive survey of the literature, published as a special supplement to the Year book for 1894/95 of the Geographischen Gesellschaft in München.)Google Scholar
10Cotter, C. H.(1983). Op. cit.Google Scholar
11Bouguer, M. (1753). Nouveau Traité de Navigation, Paris.Google Scholar
12Newhouse, D. (1685). The Whole Art of Navigation, London.Google Scholar
13Bouguer, M. (1753). Op. cit.Google Scholar
14Cotter, C. H.(1983). Op. cit.Google Scholar
15Stimson, A. N. and Daniel, C. St. J. H. (1977). The Historical Development and Modern Useof the Cross-staff, London.Google Scholar
16Norie, J. W. (1828). A New and Complete Epitome of Practical Navigation (9th edition), London.Google Scholar
17Roche, J. R. (1981). Hariot's regiment of the Sun and its background in sixteenth century navigation, Br. J. Hist. Sc. 14, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Wright, E. (1599). Certaine Errors in Navigation, London.Google Scholar
19Cotter, C. H. (1968). A History of Nautical Astronomy, London.Google Scholar