Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T23:24:20.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Airport Surface Movement – Critical Analysis of Navigation System Performance Requirements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2011

Wolfgang Schuster  and
Washington Ochieng
Wolfgang Schuster*
Affiliation:
(Centre for Transport Studies, Imperial College London)
Washington Ochieng
Affiliation:
(Centre for Transport Studies, Imperial College London)
*
(Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The CNS/ATM concept envisages reliance on global satellite navigation systems to underpin future air traffic management that is able to cope with the ever-increasing demand for air travel without jeopardising safety and the environment. In order to benefit from GNSS, it is crucial that the navigation performance required of air navigation systems is derived and agreed, based on sound principles. Significant work has been undertaken to date and agreement reached on the navigation requirements for the phases of flight up to Category I (CAT-I) precision approach, and proposals are under discussion for CAT-III precision approach. This paper completes a typical flight profile by addressing airport surface movement, and proposing the requirements based on operational requirements for each airport category, to support operations in zero visibility conditions. The benefits of the approach taken in the derivation of the requirements are discussed relative to the existing navigation requirements.

Keywords

Air Traffic ManagementAirport operationsAirport surface movement
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 64 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 281 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cassell, R., Bradfield, S., Smith, A., (1997). Airport Surface RNP – Implications for GNSS, ION NTM.Google Scholar
EASA, Certification Specifications for All Weather Operations, (2003). CS-AWO Book 2, AMC-AWO-131.Google Scholar
Eurocae, (2007). High-Level Performance Requirements for a Global Navigation Satellite System/Ground Based Augmentation System to Support Precision Approach Operations, ED-144, EUROCAE.Google Scholar
FAA, (1999). Criteria for Approval of CAT III Weather Minima for Takeoff, Landing & Rollout, FAA-AC120-28D.Google Scholar
ICAO, (1999). Annex14 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, ICAO.Google Scholar
ICAO, (2001). European Manual on Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control Systems (A-SMGCS), ICAO.Google Scholar
ICAO, (2002). Annex 11 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation – Air Traffic Services, ICAO.Google Scholar
ICAO, (2005). Aerodrome Design Manual Part 2, Taxiways, Aprons and Holding Bays, ICAO DOC 9157.Google Scholar
RTCA, (1999). Role of the GNSS in Supporting Airport Surface Operations, RTCA SC159 – DO247.Google Scholar
Schuster, W., Ochieng, W., (2010). Harmonisation of Category-III Precision Approach Performance Requirements, The Journal of Navigation, 63, 569–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar