Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:47:43.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Principles and Applications of Prediction Display

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

R. Bernotat  and
H. Widlok
R. Bernotat
Affiliation:
(Institute for Guidance and Control, Technical University of Berlin)
H. Widlok
Affiliation:
(Institute for Guidance and Control, Technical University of Berlin)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The input—output behaviour of a human operator in a control system is characterized by his ability to predict the course of a target based on past performance. With a stochastic signal or a more complicated system, however, prediction is necessarily imperfect and the operator's response lags behind the input. Mechanical prediction might therefore improve the human behaviour in a control system. The principles of the prediction display are described and two methods for mechanically calculated prediction are discussed: the model method and the extrapolation method.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , July 1966 , pp. 361 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Sheridan, T., Merel, M., Kreifeldt, J., Ferrel, W. (1964). Some predictive characteristics of the human controller, Guidance and Control 11, Academic Press, N.Y., London, pp. 645–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Howell, G., Briggs, E. Information input and processing variables in man-machine systems (a review, Astia-Report No. A.D. 230997).Google Scholar
3Weiner, E. (1962). Motion prediction as a function of target speed and duration of presentation, J. Appl. Psych. 46.Google Scholar
4Ziebolz, H., Paynter, F. (1954). Possibilities of a two-time-scale computing system for control and simulation of dynamic systems. Proc. Nat. l Electronic Conference 9, pp. 215–23.Google Scholar
3Kelley, C. (1962). Predictor instruments look into the future, Control Engineering 3, pp. 86–90.Google Scholar
6Bernotat, R. (1965). Die Informationsdarstellung als anthropotechnisches Problem der Flugführung. Bericht Nr. 37 des Institute für Flugführung and Luftverkehr.Google Scholar
7Elkind, J. I. (1956). Characteristics of Simple Manual Control Systems, Tech. Rep. No. III, Lincoln Lab., MIT, Apr. 6.Google Scholar