Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:58:11.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Orbit and Positioning Accuracy for New Generation Beidou Satellites during the Earth Eclipsing Period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2018

Xiaojie Li ,
Xiaogong Hu ,
Rui Guo ,
Chengpan Tang ,
Shanshi Zhou ,
Shuai Liu  and
Jianbing Chen
Xiaojie Li*
Affiliation:
(Beijing Satellite Navigation Center, Beijing 100094, China) (Shanghai Key Laboratory for Space Positioning and Navigation, Shanghai 200030, China) (State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth's Dynamics, Wuhan 430077, China)
Xiaogong Hu
Affiliation:
(Shanghai Key Laboratory for Space Positioning and Navigation, Shanghai 200030, China) (Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Shanghai 200030, China)
Rui Guo
Affiliation:
(Beijing Satellite Navigation Center, Beijing 100094, China)
Chengpan Tang
Affiliation:
(Shanghai Key Laboratory for Space Positioning and Navigation, Shanghai 200030, China) (Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Shanghai 200030, China)
Shanshi Zhou
Affiliation:
(Shanghai Key Laboratory for Space Positioning and Navigation, Shanghai 200030, China) (Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Shanghai 200030, China)
Shuai Liu
Affiliation:
(Beijing Satellite Navigation Center, Beijing 100094, China)
Jianbing Chen
Affiliation:
(China Top Communication Co., Ltd., Beijing 100088, China)
*
(E-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Beidou System (BDS) started functioning at the end of 2012. The Yaw-Steering (YS) attitude mode for Inclined Geosynchronous Orbit (IGSO) and Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) satellites in BDS ensures that the solar panels face the Sun. The orbit radial accuracies for IGSO/MEO satellites are 0·5 m and the User Equivalent Range Errors (UERE) are 1·5 m in YS mode. BDS-2 satellites adopt Orbit-Normal (ON) mode to meet the power supply and thermal control requirements of the satellite during deep Earth eclipse periods. In ON mode, long-term orbit ephemeris accuracy monitoring in the Operational Control System (OCS) of BDS indicates that the orbit accuracies for IGSO/MEOs are reduced to a few hundreds of metres, seriously affecting the positioning accuracy and navigation service capability of the BDS system. Solar Radiation Pressure (SRP) is difficult to model in ON mode. Continuous Yaw-Steering (CYS) mode is available for new generation Beidou satellites launched since 2015. The orbit accuracies for these new generation Beidou (BDS-3) satellites were estimated based on BDS monitoring station data and SRP models including ECOM 9/5/3. The evaluation method consisted of four steps, namely, orbit internal consistency analysis, UERE calculation, Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) data fitting Root Mean Square (RMS) determinations and positioning performance analysis; the data gathering period lasted for more than 60 days and included two CYS periods and one ON period. The experiments showed that the orbit accuracy of the radial component in CYS mode for the BDS-3 satellites degrades by 2 to 3 cm and positioning accuracy degrades only by 1 cm over that in YS mode which is just a small reduction in accuracy compared with the decimetre-level BDS orbit accuracy and the metre-level single point positioning accuracy with BDS pseudorange data. This overcomes declining orbit and positioning accuracy issues in ON mode for BDS-2 satellites. Other results also show that the reliability of BDS has been improved.

Keywords

New generation Beidou satellitesEarth eclipsing periodContinuous yaw-steering modeGlobal satellite laser ranging
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 71 , Issue 5 , September 2018 , pp. 1069 - 1087
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahmed, E. (2018). Real-Time Precise Point Positioning Using Orbit and Clock Corrections as Quasi-Observations for Improved Detection of Faults. The Journal of Navigation, 5 February 119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463317001023.Google Scholar
Bar-Sever, Y.E. (1995). A new model for yaw attitude of Global Positioning System satellites. TDA Progress Report, 15 November, 37–46.Google Scholar
Bar-Sever, Y.E. (1996). A new model for GPS yaw attitude. Journal of Geodesy, 70, 714–723.Google Scholar
Bar-Sever, Y.E. and Kuang, D. (2004). New empirically derived solar radiation pressure model for Global Positioning System satellites. IPN Progress Report 42-159, 15 November, 1–11.Google Scholar
Cao, F., Yang, X.H., Su, M.D., Li, Z.G., Chen, L., Li, W.C., Sun, B.Q., Kong, Y., Wei, P. and Feng, C.G. (2014). Evaluation of C-Band Precise Orbit Determination of Geostationary Earth Orbit Satellites based on the Chinese Area Positioning System. The Journal of Navigation, 67, 343–351.Google Scholar
Chen, J.P., Hu, X.G., Tang, C.P., Zhou, S.S., Guo, R., Pan, J.Y., Li, R. and Zhu, L.F. (2016). Orbit determination and time synchronization for new-generation Beidou satellites: Preliminary results. SCIENTIA SINICA Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica, 46, 119502, doi: 10.1360/SSPMA2016-00281 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
CSNO (2013). Beidou Navigation Satellite System Signal in Space Interface Control Document Open Service Signal (Version 2.0). China Satellite Navigation Office. 26, December, 2013.Google Scholar
Dai, X., Ge, M., Lou, Y., Shi, C., Wickert, J. and Schuh, H. (2015). Estimating the yaw-attitude of BDS IGSO and MEO satellites. Journal of Geodesy, 89, 1005–1018, doi: 10.1007/s00190-015-0829-x.Google Scholar
Dilssner, F., Springer, T. and Enderle, W. (2011a). GPS IIF yaw attitude control during eclipse season. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 9 December, 1–23.Google Scholar
Dilssner, F., Springer, T., Gienger, G. and Dow, J. (2011b). The GLONASS-M satellite yaw-attitude model. Advances in Space Research, 47, 160–171, doi:10.1016/j.asr.2010.09.007.Google Scholar
DoD. (2018). Global Positioning System Standard Positioning System Service Performances Standard. Department of Defense, USA.Google Scholar
Fliegel, H.F., Gallini, T.E. and Swift, E.R. (1992). Global positioning system radiation force model for geodetic applications. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97(B1), 559–568.Google Scholar
Guo, J. (2014). The impacts of attitude, solar radiation and function model on precise orbit determination for GNSS satellites. GNSS Research Center Wuhan University, 10, 74–80 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Guo, J., Chen, G., Zhao, Q.L., Liu, J.N. and Liu, X. (2017). Comparison of solar radiation pressure models for BDS IGSO and MEO satellites with emphasis on improving orbit quality. GPS Solutions, 21(2), 511–522.Google Scholar
Guo, J., Xu, X.L., Zhao, Q.L. and Liu, J.N. (2016). Precise orbit determination for quad-constellation satellites at Wuhan University: strategy, result validation, and comparison. Journal of Geodesy, 90, 143–159.Google Scholar
Guo, R., Zhou, J.H., Hu, X.G., Liu, L., Tang, B., Li, X.J. and Wu, Sh. (2015). Precise orbit determination and rapid orbit recovery supported by time synchronization. Advances in Space Research, 3, 2889–2898, doi:10.1016/j.asr.2015.03.001.Google Scholar
Hamad, Y., and Ahmed, E. (2007). Assessment of Several Interpolation Methods for Precise GPS Orbit. The Journal of Navigation, 60, 443–455.Google Scholar
Hauschild, A., Steigenberger, P. and Rodrihuez-Solano, C. (2012). Signal orbit and attitude analysis of Japan's first QZSS satellite Michibiki. GPS Solutions, 16, 127–133.Google Scholar
Kouba, J. (2009). A simplified yaw-attitude model for eclipsing GPS satellites. GPS Solutions, 13, 1–12.Google Scholar
Li, X.J., Zhou, J.H. and Guo, R. (2014). High-precision orbit predication and error control techniques for COMPASS navigation satellite. Chinese Science Bulletin, 59(23), 2841–2849.Google Scholar
Li, X.J., Zhou, J.H., Hu, X.G., Liu, L., Guo, R. and Zhou, S.S. (2015). Orbit determination and prediction for Beidou GEO satellites at the time of the spring/autumn equinox. Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, 58(8), 089501.Google Scholar
Mao, Y, Song, X, Wang, W, Jia, X.L., and Wu, X.B. (2014). IGSO satellite orbit determining strategy analysis with the yaw-steering and orbit-normal attitude control mode switching. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 39(11), 1352–1356 (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Mao, Y., Song, X., Wang, W., Jia, X.L. and Wu, X.B. (2015). Beidou IGSO and MEO navigation satellites' yaw steering and orbit normal attitude control modes and solar radiation pressure difference analysis. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 40(8), 129–134 (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Melachroinos, S., Tseng, T. and Papanikolaou, T. (2017) A new yaw attitude algorithm for BDS MEO and IGSOs, 2017 IGS poster.Google Scholar
Montenbruck, O. (2012). ANTEX considerations for multi-GNSS work. Antenna WG Meeting, IGS Workshop, 25 July 2012.Google Scholar
Montenbruck, O., Steigenberger, P. and Darugna, F. (2017). Semi-analytical solar radiation pressure modeling for QZS-1 orbit-normal and yaw-steering attitude. Advances in Space Research, 59, 2088–2100.Google Scholar
Montenbruck, O., Steigenberger, P. and Kirchner, G. (2013). GNSS satellite orbit validation using satellite laser ranging. Proceedings of the 18th ILRS Workshop on Laser Ranging, Fujiyoshida, Japan.Google Scholar
Springer, T.A., Beutler, G. and Rothacher, M. (1999). A new solar radiation pressure model for GPS. Advances in Space Research, 23(4), 673–676.Google Scholar
Steigenberger, P. and Montenbruck, O. (2016). Galileo status: orbits, clocks, and positioning. GPS Solutions, 21, 319–331, doi:10.1007/s10291-016-0566-5.Google Scholar
Steigenberger, P. and Montenbruck, O. (2017). Precise orbit modeling of GNSS satellites. Report CSNC2017, Shanghai.Google Scholar
Steigenberger, P., Hauschild, A. and Montenbruck, O. (2012). Orbit and clock determination of QZS-1 based on the CONGO Network. Proceedings of the 2012 International Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation, Newport Beach, CA.Google Scholar
Steigenberger, P., Hugentobler, U., Hauschild, A. and Monteubruck, O. (2013). Orbit and clock analysis of Compass GEO and IGSO satellites. Journal of Geodesy, 87, 515–525.Google Scholar
Steigenberger, P., Hugentobler, U., Loyer, S., Perosanz, F., Prange, L., Dach, R., Uhlemann, M., Gendt, G. and Montenbruck, O. (2015). Galileo orbit and clock quality of the IGS Multi-GNSS Experiment. Advances in Space Research, 55(1), 269–281, doi:10.1016/j.asr.2014.06.030.Google Scholar
Tang, C.P., Hu, X.G., Zhou, S.S., Guo, R., He, F., Liu, L., Zhu, L.F., Li, X.J., Wu, Sh., Zhao, G., Yu, Y. and Cao, Y.L. (2016). Improvement of orbit determination accuracy for Beidou Navigation Satellite System with Two-way Satellite Time Frequency Transfer. Advances in Space Research, 58, 1390–1400, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.06.007.Google Scholar
Urschl, C., Beutler, G., Gurtner, W., Hugentobler, U. and Schaer, S. (2007). Contribution of SLR tracking data to GNSS orbit determination. Advances in Space Research, 39, 1515–1523.Google Scholar
Wang, H.H., Chen, Z.G., Zheng, J.J. and Chu, H.B. (2011). A New Algorithm for Onboard Autonomous Orbit Determination of Navigation Satellites. The Journal of Navigation, 64, 162–179.Google Scholar
Wu, Z.Q., Song, S.L. and Zhou, W.L. (2015). Research progress of solar radiation pressure model for navigation satellite (in Chinese). Advances in Earth Science, 30(4), 495–504.Google Scholar
Zhao, G., Zhou, S.S., Zhou, X.H. and Wu, B. (2016). Orbit accuracy analysis for BeiDou Regional Tracing Network. China Satellite Navigation Conference 2016 Proceedings, 5, 235–244.Google Scholar
Zhao, Q.L., Wang, C., Guo, J., Wang, B. and Liu, J.N. (2018). Precise orbit and clock determination for BeiDou-3 experimental satellites with yaw attitude analysis GPS Solutions 22, 4–8.Google Scholar
Zhou, S.S., Hu, X.G. and Zhou, J.H. (2013). Accuracy analyses of precise orbit determination and timing for COMPASS/BDS-2 4GEO/5IGSO/4MEO constellation. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 245, 89–102.Google Scholar