Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:23:54.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Offshore Platform Collision Exposure to Passing Ships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

Cornelis J. Wennink
Cornelis J. Wennink
Affiliation:
(Maritime Consultant)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes a computer aided method which has been developed for assessing impending platform contacts (Impact). Some preliminary results are presented.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , May 1988 , pp. 212 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Ligthart, V. (1982). Nautical Aspects and Risk of Collision for Off-shore Structures. MARIN, Holland.Google Scholar
2 N.M.I. (1978). The Risk of Ship/Platform Encounters in U.K. Waters, Report No. 39.Google Scholar
3Pyman, M., Austin, J. and Lyon, P. (1984). The risk of collision between merchant shipping and off-shore platforms in the U.K. sector of the north sea. PIANC Bull., No. 44.Google Scholar
4 U.K. Department of Energy (1986). The Risk of Ship/Platform Collisions in the Area of the UK Continental Shelf. OTH 86217. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
5Goodwin, E. M. and Kemp, J. F. (1980). Collision risks for fixed off-shore structures. This Journal, 33, 351.Google Scholar
6Lawley, H. G. (1980). Fault Tree Analysis. Fault Tree Workshop. Lecture.Google Scholar
7Lawley, H. G. (1974). Operational studies and hazard analysis. Chem. Engng Progr., 70, No. 4.Google Scholar
8Green, A. and Bourne, A.Reliability Technology. UK Atomic Energy Authority.Google Scholar
9Parvis, R.Failure Data - A Guide for Hazard Analysis. Private communication.Google Scholar
10 Det Norske Veritas (1980–81). Cause Relationship of Collisions and Groundings. Reports 80-1099, 80-1144, 81-0097.Google Scholar
11 Raad voor de Scheepvaart (1981). Errors and restrictions of Navigational Facilities (translated title). Dutch Enquiry Court Transcript.Google Scholar
12Calvert, E. S. (1969). Human factors and the collision problem. This Journal, 22, 48.Google Scholar
13Price, R. I. (1979). Human factors – control and enforcement. Intasafcon Four, Session No. 3.Google Scholar
14Haslam, D. W. et al. (1982). The Admiralty Chart V. This Journal, 31, 418.Google Scholar
15Kerr, A. J. and Anderson, N. (1982). Communication and the nautical chart. This Journal, 35, 439.Google Scholar
16Maybourn, R. (1982). The nautical chart. This Journal, 35, 432.Google Scholar
17Lees, F. (1976). A review of instrument failure. Instn Chem. Engrs Symposium, No. 47.Google Scholar
18Schalestock, J. (1984). The human interface in the age of Satcon. Sea Tech., May.Google Scholar
19Scheepvaart, Raad voor de (1985). The strandingof an unmanned/abandoned ship (translated title). N.T.T. Jrg., 14, No. 3.Google Scholar
20Dand, I. W. (1981). The Drift of Disabled Ships in the Vicinity of Off-Shore Installations: Its Prediction and Correction. N.M.I. Report, No.116.Google Scholar

ADDITIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY

Barratt, M. J. (1981). Collision Risk Estimates in the English Channel and Western Approaches. N.M.I. Report No. 115.Google Scholar
Koburger, C. W. (1985). Management of Navigational Risks in Western European Waters. NTT No. 6.Google Scholar
Ligthart, V. (1981). The North Sea. 5610/M46076/R30. MARIN, Holland.Google Scholar