Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:23:36.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

European Studies to Investigate the Feasibility of using 1000 ft Vertical Separation Minima above FL 290. Part II. Precision Radar Data Analysis and Collision Risk Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

D. Harrison  and
G. Moek
D. Harrison
Affiliation:
(Civil Aviation Authority, CAA, London)
G. Moek
Affiliation:
(National Aerospace Laboratory, NLR, Amsterdam)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is the second of a series of three papers, documenting the European studies into the feasibility of 1000 ft vertical separation minima above FL290. The paper discusses the vertical collision risk estimation methodology and an assessment of the collision risk against a target level of safety.

The analysis indicates the technical feasibility of a reduced vertical separation minima in the North Atlantic Region. However, for current operations and technical performance within European continental airspace, the risk estimation indicates that a 1000 ft minima is not technically feasible.

The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors concerned; they do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the CAA or NLR.

Keywords

1. Air trafic control2. Risk analysis3. Flight levels
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , January 1992 , pp. 91 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Reich, P. G. (1966). Analysis of long range air traffic systems – separation standards. This Journal 19, 88, 169 and 331.Google Scholar
2ICAO. (1988). Report of the sixth meeting of the Review of the General Concept of Separation Panel, 28 November –15 December 1988. DOC 9536, ICAO, Montreal.Google Scholar
3Colamosca, B., Rigolizzo, R., Smoot, W., Joyce, K., and Schust, A. (1988). Summary report of United States studies on 1000-foot vertical separation above Flight Level 290. ICAO, RGCSP-WG/B-WP/144, Montreal.Google Scholar
4Nagaoka, S. (1987). Estimation of the probability of vertical overlap of a proximate pair of aircraft based on NAMS data. RGCSP-WG/B-WP/55, January. ICAO, Montreal.Google Scholar
5 EUROCONTROL. (1989). European studies of vertical separation above FL 290 – summary report. Doc 88/20/10, December. EUROCONTROL, Brussels.Google Scholar
6Scholten, H. J. P. (1984). Technical design of the European VErtical radar DAta processing system (EVEDA), NLR Memorandum IN-84-011, National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
7Ten Have, J. M. (1988). European vertical main data collection: processing and analysis. NLR TR 88014L, National Aerospace Laboratory, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
8Clarke, L. and Irving, J. (1987). Report on investigations into aircraft with measured height deviations of 300 ft or more (‘rogue’ aircraft). Report No. 2O7, EUROCONTROL, Brussels.Google Scholar
9Harrison, D., McGowan, D., and Cannell, W. (1988). Statistics of height-keeping deviations from the European vertical data collection. DORA Communication 8804, CAA, London.Google Scholar
10Cannell, W. P. (1985). The development of a Target Level of Safety for vertical separation at high altitude. RGCSP s-WP/117, May. ICAO, Montreal.Google Scholar
11Cannell, W. P. (1985). Further considerations regarding TLS. VSSG-DP/38, November. EUROCONTROL, Brussels.Google Scholar
12Harrison, D. (1988). Estimating the probability of vertical overlap from the single aircraft data obtained in the European vertical data collection. DORA Report 8826, CAA, London.Google Scholar
13Moek, G. (1988). Estimating the probability of vertical overlap from the paired aircraft data obtained in the European vertical data collection using the program DGLDIF. NLR TR 88108. National Aerospace Laboratory, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
14Bradley, J. W. (1987). Preliminary results of fitting distributions to Total Vertical Error and Assigned Altitude Data available from results of US data collection activities. RGCSP- WG/B-WP/28, January. ICAO, Montreal.Google Scholar