Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:23:44.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Display Requirements for ECDIS/ARPA Overlay Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

G. P. Smeaton ,
W. O. Dineley  and
S. M. Tucker
G. P. Smeaton
Affiliation:
(Liverpool John Moores University)
W. O. Dineley
Affiliation:
(Liverpool John Moores University)
S. M. Tucker
Affiliation:
(Liverpool John Moores University)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The International Maritime Consultative Organization (now IMO) carriage requirement for ARPA began to take effect in 1984 and became progressively mandatory worldwide; prior to this, for certain classes of vessels trading to the USA, a national requirement was introduced in 1982. These radar plotting aids perhaps constituted the first widespread use of computing power aboard merchant vessels. In implementation, even the early ARPAS were much more than the mere plotting aid which their name suggests. Sophisticated processing gave the navigator a system which offered significant assistance in scenario analysis, with the well known ability to display graphically the effect of a trial manoeuvre being the most active element of the system.

Keywords

1. Marine radar.2. Electronic charts.3. Collision avoidance.
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , January 1995 , pp. 13 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1IMO (1993). Draft Performance Standards for ECDIS. IMO/IHO Harmonization Group on ECDIS.Google Scholar
2IHO (1991). Transfer Standard for Digital Hydrographic Data SP 57. Int. Hydrographic Office, Monaco.Google Scholar
3IHO (1988, 1990, 1992). Draft Specifications for Chart Content and Display of ECDIS SP 52. Int. Hydrographic Office, Monaco.Google Scholar
4Smeaton, G. P.et al. (1992). The use of interactive video and spatial data in a Marine GIS/Electronic Chart. Proceedings of Euro Nay 92, RIN/ DGON Int. Conference, London.Google Scholar
5 (1994) Admiralty Raster Scan Service. The Hydrographic Office, Taunton, UK.Google Scholar
6 (1994). Specification for the Hydrographic Chart Raster Format. The Hydrographic Office, Taunton, UK.Google Scholar
7Norris, A. P. (1993). The impact of Electronic Charts on Navigation. Proceedings of a Conference on the Impact of New Technology on the Marine Industries, Southampton.Google Scholar
8Gaines, A. G. (1993). U.S. ECDIS Test Bed Project. Overview and Update. Proceedings of an Int. Conference on Maritime Communications and Control, Inst. Marine Engineers, London.Google Scholar
9DGON (1993). Superimposition of ECDIS and Radar/ARPA. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ortung Navigation E.V., Dusseldorf.Google Scholar
10IMO (1989). International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGS). International Maritime Organization, London.Google Scholar
11Endsley, M. (1988). Situation awareness global assessment techniques. Proceedings of the National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, Dayton, USA.Google Scholar