Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T04:49:38.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ADS-B System Failure Modes and Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2014

Busyairah Syd Ali ,
Washington Ochieng ,
Arnab Majumdar ,
Wolfgang Schuster  and
Thiam Kian Chiew
Busyairah Syd Ali*
Affiliation:
(Imperial College London)
Washington Ochieng
Affiliation:
(Imperial College London)
Arnab Majumdar
Affiliation:
(Imperial College London)
Wolfgang Schuster
Affiliation:
(Imperial College London)
Thiam Kian Chiew
Affiliation:
(University of Malaya, Malaysia)
*
(E-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B) is envisioned to support seamless aircraft surveillance and enhanced air-to-air and air-to-ground applications. ADS-B is an integrated system, dependent on on board navigation systems to obtain aircraft state information as well as a communication data link to broadcast this information to Air Traffic Control (ATC) on the ground and other ADS-B equipped aircraft. To quantify system safety, a good understanding of the potential failure modes of the system is vital. ADS-B system failure modes include those from the communication and navigation systems and human and environmental factors, as well as ADS-B-specific components. In this paper, potential failure modes of the ADS-B system are identified using an approach developed in this paper. The end output of the approach is an ADS-B failure mode register. However, the approach is transferable to other ATC surveillance systems. The paper further provides the failure classification and modelling, and also analyses the failure modes' impact on ATC operations and finally proposes potential mitigations. It is important to note that the work carried out in this paper is based on the assumption that the ADS-B operates as the primary surveillance source for the ATC.

Keywords

ADS-BFailure modeFailure model
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 67 , Issue 6 , November 2014 , pp. 995 - 1017
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ali, B. S., Majumdar, A., Ochieng, W. Y. and Schuster, W. (2013a). ADS-B: The Case for London Terminal Manoeuvring Area (LTMA), in Tenth USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar (ATM2013), Chicago, USA.Google Scholar
Ali, B. S., Schuster, W., Ochieng, W., Thiam, Kian Chiew and Majumdar, A. (2013b). Framework for ADS-B Performance Assessment: the London TMA Case Study, Journal of the Institute of Navigation.Google Scholar
Ali, B. S., Schuster, W., Ochieng, W. Y. and Majumdar, A. (2013c). A Study of ADS-B Data Evaluation and Related Problems, in 2013 International Technical Meeting, Institute of Navigation, San Diego, Calfornia, USA.Google Scholar
Bhatti, U. I. and Ochieng, W. Y. (2007). Failure Modes and Models for Integrated GPS/INS Systems, Journal of Navigation, 60, 327–348.Google Scholar
Esler, D. (2007). ADS-B's Impact on Business Aviation, Business and Commercial Aviation, 101(5), 68–81.Google Scholar
EUROCONTROL (2008). Preliminary Safety Case for Enhanced Air Traffic Services in Non-Radar Area using ADS-B Surveillance, European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation, (1.1).Google Scholar
EUROCONTROL (2010). Preliminary Safety Case for Air Traffic Control Service in Radar Areas using ADS-B Surveillance, [online], available: http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/nm/surveillance/cascade/surveillance-preliminary-safety-case-enhanced-air-trafffic-services-non-radar-areas-using-ads-b-surveillance-20101214.pdfGoogle Scholar
EUROCONTROL (2011a). Preliminary Safety Case for ADS-B in Airport Surface Surveillance (APT) [online], available: http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/publication/files/surveillance-cascade-preliminary-safety-case-for-airports-surface-surveillance-applications-201111.pdfGoogle Scholar
EUROCONTROL (2011b). Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Implementing Rule (SPI-IR) [online], available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/;jsessionid=QcYRTxbZk87bQks5dZtTwvc5zSqF1gM1bvRN1CyQVpJ1tFFnrnfk!-2081994908?uri=CELEX:32011R1207Google Scholar
Eurocontrol Safety Regulation Commission (2011). Review of the Preliminary Safety Case for Air Traffic Service in Radar Areas using Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast, SRC Position Paper [online], available: http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/article/content/documents/single-sky/src/position-papers/src-pos-ads-b-rad-e1.0.pdfGoogle Scholar
Federal Aviation Administration (2011). ADS-B Implementation, [online], available: http://www.faa.gov/nextgen/implementation/portfolio/trans_support_progs/adsbGoogle Scholar
Hammer, J., Calgaris, G. and Llobet, M. (2007). Safety Analysis Methodology for ADS-B Based Surveillance Applications, 7th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar.Google Scholar
ICAO (1998). Manual on Airspace Planning Methodology for the Determination of Separation Minima, Doc-9689.Google Scholar
ICAO (2003a) Automatic Dependant Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) Study and Implementation Task Force, Brisbane Australia.Google Scholar
ICAO (2003b). Operational Use of ADS-B In Non-Radar Airspace Generic Design Safey Case, ICAO Separation and Airspace Safety Panel (SASP), (SASP_WGWHL4_WP27A).Google Scholar
ICAO (2006a). Assessment of ADS-B to Support Air Traffic Services and Guidelines for Implementation, Cir 311 AN/177.Google Scholar
ICAO (2006b). Procedures for air navigation services – aircraft operations (PAN-OPS), Doc 8168 OPS/611.Google Scholar
ICAO (2007). Air Traffic Management (ATM), Doc-4444.Google Scholar
NATS (2011) CRISTAL RAD HD, Issue 1, NATS UK.Google Scholar
Ochieng, W. and Sauer, K. (2003). GPS Integrity and Potential Impact on Aviation Safety, Journal of Navigation, 56, 51–65.Google Scholar
Office of Inspector General (2011). FAA Oversight Is Key for Contractor-Owned Air Traffic Control Systems That Are Not Certified, [online], available: http://www.oig.dot.gov/sites/dot/files/Final%20Report%20NAS%20Cert_0.pdfGoogle Scholar
Rausand, M. and Høyland, A. (2004). System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
RTCA (2002). Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards For Automatic Dependant Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B), (DO-242A).Google Scholar
RTCA (2011). Minimum Operational Performance Standards for 1090 MHz Extended Squitter Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) and Traffic Information Services – Broadcast (TIS-B), DO-260B.Google Scholar
SKYbrary (2013). Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B), Air Ground Communication [online], available: http://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Automatic_Dependent_Surveillance_Broadcast_(ADS-B)Google Scholar
The Royal Academy of Engineering (2011) Global Navigation Space Systems: reliance and vulnerabilities, ISBN 1-903496-62-4, London SW1Y 5DG: Royal Academy of Engineering.Google Scholar
Walala, M. (2008). A System Safety Study Using Analytical Tools and Techniques Evaluating the Implementation of ADS-B Technology for Aircraft Ground Operations at Non-towered Airports, unpublished thesis Embry Riddle Aeronautical University.Google Scholar