Article contents
Politics, Perception, and Development Strategy in Tropical Africa
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 November 2008
Extract
In order to depict adequately the significance of political and economic interaction in tropical Africa, it is necessary to sketch the background of recent changes in that area lying south of the Sahara and north of Angola, Rhodesia, and Mozambique. Here are some 30 states ranging in size from over 2.5 million sq.km. in the Sudan to less than 00.1 million sq.km. in the Gambia; in population from almost 80 million in Nigeria to about 400,000 in the Gambia; in density from over 120 per sq.km. in Burundi to less than one per sq.km. in Mauritania; in income per capita from over $400 in Gabon to less than $50 in Burundi, Somalia, and Upper Volta; and in G.N.P. from over $4.5 billion in Nigeria to less than $30 million in Gambia.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975
References
Page 36 note 1 See Friedmann, John, Urbanization, Planning, and National Development (Beverly Hills and London, 1973),Google Scholar notably ch. 3, ‘A Theory of Polarized Development’.
Page 38 note 1 The data in this paragraph are drawn from the following Ford Foundation studies: Rosser, C., Urbanization in Tropical Africa: a dsmographic introduction (New York, 1972),Google ScholarGreen, L. and Milone, V., Urbanization in Nigeria: a planning commentary (New York, 1971),Google Scholar and Laurenti, L., Urbanization Trends and Prospects: Kenya (New York, 1972).Google Scholar
Page 38 note 2 See Hirschman, Albert, ‘The Changing Tolerance for Income Inequality in the Course of Economic Development,’ in Quarterly Journal of Economics (Cambridge, Mass.), 87, 4, 11 1973, pp. 544–66.Google Scholar
Page 40 note 1 Jones, Brendan, ‘Black Africa's Developing Economy,’ in Black Enterprise (New York), 12 1973, p. 19.Google Scholar
Page 41 note 1 E.g. Williamson, J. G., ‘Regional Inequality and the Process of National Development: a description of patterns,’ in Economic Development and Cultural Change (Chicago), XIII, 1965, pp. 3–45.Google Scholar
Page 41 note 2 Hirschman, Albert, The Strategy of Economic Development (New Haven, 1958), pp. 183–201.Google Scholar
Page 41 note 3 Myrdal, Gunnar, Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions (New York, 1957).Google Scholar
Page 42 note 1 Parr, J. B., ‘Regional Economic Change and Regional Spatial Structure: some interrelationships,’ in Karisruhe Papers in Regional Science, Vol. 3 (London,1974).Google Scholar
Page 43 note 1 Gerhart, John, Rural Development and Urban Growth in Kenya (New York, 1972), pp. 3 and 9.Google Scholar
Page 43 note 2 Rosser, op. cit.
Page 43 note 3 Kamarck, Andrew, The Economics of African Development (New York, 1971), p. 291.Google Scholar
Page 43 note 4 Waterson, Albert, Development Planning: lessons of experience (Baltimore, 1965) p. 341.Google Scholar
Page 44 note 1 Kamarck, op. cit. p. 265.
Page 45 note 1 Friedmann, John, ‘Planning as Innovation: the Chilean case,’ in American Institute of Planners Journal (Washington), XXXII, 07 1966, p. 197.Google Scholar
Page 47 note 1 Kano State of Nigeria. Development Plan, 1970–74 (Kano, 1970).Google Scholar
Page 47 note 2 Harrison, Bennett, ‘Rural Growth Centres: a strategy for the rural development of low income countries,’ unpublished research proposal prepared for U.S. A.I.D., Washington, 1967, p. I.Google Scholar
Page 48 note 1 Ibid. p. 54.
Page 48 note 2 See, for example, Tolosa, H. and Reiner, T., ‘The Economic Programming of a System of Planned Poles,’ in Economic Geography (Worcester, Mass.), 46, 3, 07 1970, pp. 449–58.Google Scholar
Page 49 note 1 Cf. Parr, J. B., ‘Growth Poles, Regional Development and Central Place Theory,’ in Papers of the Regional Science Association (Philadelphia), XXXI, 1973.Google Scholar
Page 51 note 1 Green and Milone, loc. cit. p. 14.
Page 51 note 2 Rosser, loc. cit. p. 39.
- 1
- Cited by