Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:02:53.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cabo Verde and the MCA foreign aid programme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2020

João Resende-Santos*
Affiliation:
Department of Global Studies, Bentley University, Waltham, MA02452, USA

Abstract

In 2005, Cabo Verde became the second African country to receive the new foreign aid programme of the USA, the Millennium Challenge Account (MCA). It was among the few recipients of a second grant. Foreign aid has always been a controversial and hotly contested issue, and the MCA is no exception. This paper, based partly on personal experience with the programme, provides a critical examination of the nature, process and implementation of the MCA grants in Cabo Verde. The country had campaigned aggressively for the grants. The MCA not only financed important public investments, it was debt-free and without conditionalities. However, even while it allowed more leeway over its use and implementation compared with other aid programmes, it engendered its own challenges.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The views and ideas expressed in this article are solely the author's, based exclusively on his own professional experience and assessments, and do not in any way represent or reflect the views of any government or any other institution.

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, D. & Robinson, J.. 2012. Why Nations Fail? New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Adedokun, A.J. 2017. ‘Foreign aid, governance and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: does one cap fit all?’, African Development Review 29, 2: 184–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
African Development Bank (AfDB). 2012. Cape Verde – A Success Story. Tunis: AfDB.Google Scholar
Amado, A.D. 2014. ‘Dôs Pezôd ou o Liliputiano e o Colosso? As Relaçôes Internacionais entre Cabo Verde e os EUA’, in Delgado, J.P., Varela, O.B. & Costa, S., eds. As Relações Externas de Cabo Verde: (Re)Leituras Contemporâneas. Lisboa: Ed. ISCJS, 477506.Google Scholar
Asongu, S. 2014. ‘The questionable economics of development assistance in Africa: hot-fresh evidence, 1996–2010’, Review of Black Political Economy 41: 455–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banco de Cabo Verde (BCV). 2018. Boletím de Estatísticas – Agosto 2018. Praia: BCV.Google Scholar
Bertram, G. 1999. ‘The MIRAB model twelve years on’, Contemporary Pacific 11, 1: 105–38.Google Scholar
Bourguignon, F. & Sundberg, M.. 2007. ‘Aid effectiveness – opening the black box’, American Economic Review 97, 2: 316–21.10.1257/aer.97.2.316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnside, C. & Dollar, D.. 2000. ‘Aid, policies, and growth’, American Economic Review 90, 4: 847–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbone, M. 2004. ‘The Millennium Challenge Account: a marginal revolution in US foreign aid policy?’, Review of African Political Economy 31, 101: 536–42.Google Scholar
Cardoso, K. 2014. ‘Das Baleeiras ao Millennium Challenge Account: Os Desafios das Relações Entre Cabo Verde e os Estados Unidos da America’, in Delgado, J.P., Varela, O.B. and Costa, S., eds. As Relações Externas de Cabo Verde: (Re)Leituras Contemporâneas. Lisboa: Ed. ISCJS, 507–28.Google Scholar
Dennis, M. 2008. ‘A new approach to foreign aid: a case study of the Millennium Challenge Account’, IILJ Emerging Scholars Paper 12. New York, NY: NYU.Google Scholar
Edwards, S. 2015. ‘Economic development and the effectiveness of foreign aid: a historical perspective’, Kyklos 68, 3: 277316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, H. 1967. ‘Aid as imperialism?International Affairs 43, 2: 219–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halter, M. 1993. Between Race and Ethnicity: Cape Verdean American Immigrants 1860–1965. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hausmann, R., Rodrik, D. & Velasco, A.. 2005. Growth Diagnostics, Rev. Cambridge, MA: JFK School of Government.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2018. IMF Country Report 18 (105) – Cape Verde: Selected Issues Paper. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Knoll, M. & Zloczysti, P.. 2011. ‘The good governance indicators of the Millennium Challenge Account: how many dimensions are really being measured?World Development 40, 5: 900–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, N. 2016. ‘Nonlinearity in the efficacy of foreign aid and the poverty trap’, Journal of Developing Areas 50, 3: 6992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebovic, J. 2014. ‘The Millennium Challenge Corporation: organizational constraints on US Foreign Aid, 2004–2011’, World Development 58: 116–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mawdsley, E. 2007. ‘The Millennium Challenge Account: neo-liberalism, poverty and security’, Review of International Political Economy 14, 3: 487509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC). 2004 a. Report on Countries that are Candidates for Millennium Challenge Account Eligibility in FY 2004 and Countries that are Not Candidates because of Legal Prohibitions. Washington, DC: MCC.Google Scholar
Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC). 2004 b. Report on the Selection of MCA Eligible Countries for FY 2004. Washington, DC: MCC.Google Scholar
Ministry of Finance and Planning (MFP). 2010. Cape Verde: Constraints to Growth, Transformation and Poverty Alleviation. Praia: MFP.Google Scholar
Molenaers, D., Dellepiane, S. & Faust, J.. 2015. ‘Political conditionality and foreign aid’, World Development 75: 212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowels, L. 2006. ‘Millennium Challenge Account: ‘Implementation of a New U.S. Foreign Aid Initiative’’, CRS Report to Congress. Washington, DC: CRS.Google Scholar
Ohler, H., Nunnenkamp, P. & Dreher, A.. 2012. ‘Does conditionality work? A test for an innovative US aid scheme’, European Economic Review 56: 138–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2018. Development Assistance Committee (DAC), Official Development Assistance database. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Owusu, F.Y. 2017. ‘Post-9/11 U.S. foreign aid, the Millennium Challenge Account, and Africa: how many birds can one stone kill?Africa Today 54, 1: 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. 1988. ‘Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games’, International Organization 42, 3: 427–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quibria, M.G. 2014. ‘Aid effectiveness: research, policy, and unresolved issues’, Development Studies Review 1, 1: 7587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resende-Santos, J. 2016. ‘Rethinking diaspora in development policy’, International Migration 54, 2: 8297.10.1111/imig.12212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, J. 2005: The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time. New York, NY: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Soederberg, S. 2004. ‘American empire and ‘excluded states’: the Millennium Challenge Account and the shift to pre-emptive development’, Third World Quarterly 25, 2: 279302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). 2016. The Least Developed Countries Report 2016. New York, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar
United States Agency for International Development (USAID). 1976. Green Book – U.S. Overseas Loans and Grants and Assistance from International Organizations. Washington, DC: USAID.Google Scholar
United States Agency for International Development (USAID). 1985. Green Book – U.S. Overseas Loans and Grants and Assistance from International Organizations. Washington, DC: USAID.Google Scholar
United States Agency for International Development (USAID). 2018. Foreign Aid Explorer – US Foreign Aid by Country 2018. Washington, DC: USAID.Google Scholar
Woods, N. 2005. ‘The shifting politics of foreign aid’, International Affairs 81, 2: 393409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 1985. Cape Verde: Economic Situation and Prospects, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2010. Doing Business Report 2010. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2017. World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar