Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:50:10.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alienation, Urbanisation, and Social Networks in the Sudan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Richard A. Lobban
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Rhode Island, Providence

Extract

Urbanisation is often held to be responsible for social disorder and alienation. In fact, the stresses experienced in the process of urbanisation can produce both a breakdown and/or a reinforcement of patterns of social association. Many scholars have discarded the term ‘alienation’ because of its multiplicity of meanings, but I believe that when the word is defined in terms of social network ‘density’ there is considerable utility for social scientific interpretation. Even in relatively similar urban communities, small differences in network density have important manifestations in the types of response to urbanisation.

Type
Africana
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Page 491 note 1 An earlier version of this article was presented to the African Studies Association, Chicago, in November 1974

Page 492 note 1 Lobban, Richard A., ‘The Historical Rôle of the Mahas in the Urbanization of Sudan's Three Towns’, in African Urban Notes (Los Angeles), VI, 2, 1971, pp. 2438.Google Scholar

Page 493 note 1 Lobban, Richard A., ‘Social Networks in the Urban Sudan’, Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, 1973, pp. 150–9.Google Scholar

Page 494 note 1 Gist, N. P. and Fava, S. F., Urban Society (New York, 1933 and 1964), p. 272.Google Scholar

Page 494 note 2 Seeman, M., ‘On the Meaning of Alienation’, in American Sociological Review (Albany, N.Y.), XXIV, 6, 1959, p. 783.Google Scholar

Page 494 note 3 J. P. Clark, ‘Measuring Alienation within a Social System’, ibid. pp. 849–52.

Page 495 note 1 Dwight G. Dean, ‘Alienation: its meaning and measurement’, ibid. XXVI, 5, 1961, pp. 753–8.

Page 495 note 2 C. Browning, ibid. pp. 780–1.

Page 495 note 3 Kaufman, A. S., ‘On Alienation’, in Inquiry (Bergen), VIII, 2, 1965, pp. 141–65.Google Scholar

Page 495 note 4 Feuer, Lewis, ‘What is Alienation? The Career of a Concept’, in New Politics (New York), I, 3, 1962, pp. 116–34.Google Scholar

Page 496 note 1 Pappenheim, F., The Alienation of Modern Man (New York, 1959), pp. 12, 16, 36, and 132.Google Scholar

Page 496 note 2 Weiskopf, W. A., Alienation and Economics (New York, 1971), p. 22.Google Scholar

Page 496 note 3 Oilman, B., Alienation: Marx's conception of man in capitalist society (Cambridge, 1971), p. 133.Google Scholar

Page 496 note 4 Marx quoted by Oilman, ibid. p. 206.

Page 497 note 1 Marx, quoted by Osipov, G., Sociology (Moscow, 1969), p. 23.Google Scholar

Page 497 note 2 Fronum, E., Marx's Concept of Man (New York, 1961), p. 95.Google Scholar

Page 497 note 3 Cf. Schacht, R., Alienation (Garden City, N.Y., 1970), pp. 261–3.Google Scholar

Page 498 note 1 Le Roy, G., ‘The Concept of Alienation: an attempt at a definition’, in Herbert, Aptheker (ed), Marxism and Alienation: a symposium (New York, 1965), pp. 1314.Google Scholar

Page 498 note 2 Lobban, Richard A., ‘Urbanization and Social Network Configuration in the Three Towns’, meeting of the African Studies Association, Philadelphia, 11 1972,Google Scholar and ‘Social Networks in the Urban Sudan’, op. cit.

Page 498 note 3 Epstein, A. L., ‘The Network and Urban Social Organization’, in Rhodes-Livingstone Papers (Livingstone), XXIX, 1961, pp. 2962;Google Scholar and Mitchell, J. Clyde, Social Networks in Urban Situations (New York, 1969).Google Scholar