Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:21:00.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regional Hegemony: Domination and Resistance in the Horn of Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Ruth Iyob
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Contested territories and challenges to state sovereignty have become almost the norm in post-colonial Africa. The nexus of many of these conflicts resides in a status quo which gives primacy to territorial integrity over the right of peoples to self-determination. The comparative advantage thus accorded to sovereign states has resulted in a disequilibrium that legitimated the violation of both regionally and internationally sanctioned rules enshrined in the Organisation of African Unity (O.A.U.) and the United Nations (U.N.). Thus a normative bias in favour of the imperative of stability and order was justified by reference to the fragility of the newly independent régimes. In the process, the right of self-determination was narrowly interpreted to refer solely to those African peoples waging liberation struggles against European colonialism or white rule.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Modern African Studies , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 257 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cited in Ellis, John, The Social History of the Machine Gun (New York, 1970), p. 70.Google Scholar

2 Lemarchand, René, The Green and the Black: Qadhafi's policies in Africa (Bloomington, 1988), p. 169.Google Scholar See also, Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: a study of order in world politics (London, 1977), pp. 215–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 See Hoare, Quintin and Smith, Geoffrey Nowell (eds. and translators), Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (New York, 1971), pp. 210–46Google Scholar; Adamson, Walter L., Hegemony and Revolution: a study of Antonio Gramsci's political and cultural theory (Berkeley, 1980), pp. 169–201Google Scholar; and Gill, Stephen, African Hegemony and the Trilateral Commission (Cambridge, 1990), pp. 41–6.Google Scholar

4 Babu, Abdul Rahman Mohamed, in Cliffe, Lionel and Davidson, Basil (eds.), The Long Struggle of Eritrea for Independence and Constructive Peace (Trenton, NJ, 1988), pp. 49–50.Google Scholar

5 It should be remembered that the legacy of the Axumite Empire had been appropriated by Ethiopian chroniclers and given currency by Africanists who equated all the conquered territories with modern Ethiopia. Myths and facts were later combined to create a convincing national history.Google Scholar

6 White, N. D., The United Nations and the Maintenance of International Peace and Security (Manchester, 1990).Google Scholar

7 See Mansback, Richardet al., The Web of World Politics: non-state actors in the global system (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1976).Google Scholar

8 Emerson, Rupert, From Empire to Nation: the rise to self-assertion of Asian and African peoples (Cambridge, MA, 1960), p. 298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Mayall, James, ‘Self-determination and the OAU’, in Lewis, I. M. (ed.), Nationalism and Self Determination in the Horn of Africa (London, 1983), pp. 80–5.Google Scholar

10 See ‘Declaration to the Colonial Peoples’, Pan-African Congress, Manchester, 1945,Google Scholar cited in Legum, Colin, Pan-Africanism: a short political guide (New York, 1982), p. 137.Google Scholar

11 Bull, op. cit. p. 201.

12 Lemarchand, op. cit. p. 169.

13 Smart, Barry, Michel Foucault (London, 1985), pp. 67–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 My encapsulation of the mechanics of the ‘régime of truth’ as the ‘decoding of history and the encoding of reality’ owes a great deal to Hughes, William, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar

15 Keller, Edmond J., Revolutionary Ethiopia: from empire to people's republic (Bloomington and Indianapolis, 1988).Google Scholar

16 Marcus, Harold G., Ethiopia, Great Britain, and the United States, 1941–1974: the politics of empire (Berkeley, 1983), p. 48.Google Scholar

17 Levine, Donald N., Greater Ethiopia: the evolution of a multiethnic society (Chicago and London, 1974), ch. 1, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar See also, Schwab, Peter, Haile Selassie: Ethiopia's Lion of Judah (Chicago, 1979), pp. 10–12.Google Scholar

18 Lewis (ed.), op. cit. p. 4.

19 For example, see Erlich, Haggai, Ethiopia and the Challenge to Independence (Boulder, CO, 1985), pp. 202–8.Google Scholar

20 Cf.Pankhurst, E. Sylvia, Eritrea on the Eve: the past and the future of Italy's ‘first-born’ colony, Ethiopia's ancient sea province (Woodford Green, Essex, 1952)Google Scholar and Ethiopia and Eritrea: the last phase of the reunion struggle, 1941–1952 (Woodford Green, Essex, 1953)Google Scholar; Gilkes, Patrick, The Dying Lion: feudalism and modernization in Ethiopia (London, 1975)Google Scholar; and Spencer, John H., Ethiopia at Bay: a personal account of the Haile Selassie years (Algonac, MI, 1984).Google Scholar

22 For example, Nigeria is a relatively powerful oil-producing nation which has not utilised its economic clout to impose hegemony on the region, although it did succeed in quelling various rebellions within the federal structure and has played an active rôle in the deployment of multinational forces in Liberia. See Nwokedi, Emeka, ‘Le Myth d'un leadership nigérian dans les relations inter-africains’, in Études internationales (Quebec), 22, 2, 06 1991, pp. 357–68.Google Scholar

23 See, for example, Abrahams, Peter, A Wreath for Udomo (London, 1956) which emphasises betrayalGoogle Scholar, and Mazrui, Ali A., The Trial of Christopher Okigbo (London, 1971) which focuses on the tragic loss of Africa's youth in the post-colonial wars. The implicit message of both is the inevitable clash between state- and people-oriented nationalism. Although it may not have been the intention of these two authors to legitimate the extreme actions of some African régimes, their works attest to the idealism of the first-generation of anti-colonial African nationalists enamoured of the vision of a pan-Africanist regional order.Google Scholar

24 Addis Zemen (Addis Ababa), 19 06 and 5 07 1991.Google Scholar

25 ‘Principles of Cooperation Between the Transitional Government of Ethiopia and the Provisional Government of Eritrea’, Addis Ababa, 1991.Google Scholar

26 Addis Zemen, 5 July 1991.

27 Hadas Ertra (Asmara), 3 10 1992.Google Scholar

28 Ibid. 7 October 1992.

29 United Nations General Assembly, New York, Forty-Seventh Session, Third Committee, Agenda item 97(b), A/C.3/47/L.20/Rev.1, 10 11 1992.Google Scholar

30 The Economist (London), 1 05 1993, p. 6.Google Scholar

31 Statement by Mesfin, H. E. Seyoum, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Transitional Government of Ethiopia, at the U.N. General Assembly, 5 October 1992.Google Scholar