Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:05:33.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Reliability of Psychiatric, and the Validity of Psychological, Diagnoses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

G. A. Foulds
G. A. Foulds*
Affiliation:
Runwell Hospital, Wickford, Essex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In determining the diagnostic value of psychological tests the usual external criterion is the psychiatric diagnosis. This criterion has suffered a steady decline in prestige among both psychiatrists and psychologists. The following remarks by Noyes (1953) would be endorsed by many psychiatrists: “The principal value of classification is not in the categorizing of a disease entity but in quickly eliminating those considerations which will be least useful in understanding the patient and in directing attention to those which are likely to be relevant. Except in organic disorders a classificatory diagnosis is less important than a psychodynamic study of the personality. The psychiatrist should be interested in processes, not in labels … we should endeavour not so much to fit the symptoms into a classificatory scheme as to understand the sick person in terms of his life experience.”

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 101 , Issue 425 , October 1955 , pp. 851 - 862
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1955 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ash, P., J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1949, 44, 272–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doering, C. R., Amer J. Orthopsychiat., 1934, 4, 249–257.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., The Scientific Study of Personality, 1952. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulds, G. A., Brit. J. Psychol., 1951, 42, 209–217.Google Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1952, 43, 33–41.Google Scholar
Idem , Speed of performance on mental tests among psychoneurotics, 1953. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of London.Google Scholar
Himmelweit, H. T., J. of Personality, 1945, 14, 95–105.Google Scholar
Hunt, W. A., Wittson, C. L., and Hunt, E. B., in Current Problems in Psychiatric Diagnosis (Eds., Hoch, P. H., and Zubin, J.), 1953, 53–65. New York. Google Scholar
Masserman, J. H., and Carmichael, H. T., J. Ment. Sci., 1938, 84, 893–946.Google Scholar
Mehlman, B., J. abnorm soc Psychol., 1952, 47, 577–578.Google Scholar
Noyes, A. P., Modern Clinical Psychiatry, 1953, p. 159. Philadelphia and London.Google Scholar
Roe, A., J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1949, 44, 36–41.Google Scholar
Wittenborn, J. R., J. Consult. Psychol., 1951, 15, 290–302.Google Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1952, 16, 107–109.Google Scholar
Zubin, J., in Current Problems in Psychiatric Diagnosis (Eds., Hoch, P. H., and Zubin, J.), 1953, 112–118. New York.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.