Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:35:37.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relation of Laterality of Lesion to Performance on Weigl's Sorting Test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

J. McFie  and
M. F. Piercy
J. McFie
Affiliation:
From the Psychological Department, The National Hospital, Queen Square
M. F. Piercy
Affiliation:
From the Psychological Department, The National Hospital, Queen Square
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Colour-Form Sorting Test was described by Weigl (1927) as one of a series of investigations into the nature of the psychological deficit resulting from a cerebral lesion. The material consists of 12 pieces: four squares, coloured severally red, yellow, blue and green; four circles, similarly coloured; and four equilateral triangles, similarly coloured (Fig. 1). They are presented in a random arrangement to the patient, who is asked to group them according to any similarity he sees; and when he has sorted them according to one principle, is then asked to sort them according to another.

Other problems involving sorting were presented in Weigl's study, and have been used in a number of investigations, particularly of the effects of frontal lobe lesions. Rylander (1939) found that his group of patients with frontal lesions differed significantly from the normal controls in the number of principles found for grouping 15 objects. Halstead (1940) used 62 common objects, and also found that patients with frontal lesions tended to find fewer principles for sorting than did patients with cerebral lesions located elsewhere. Subsequently Halstead and Settlage (1943) developed a mechanized grouping test, using geometrical figures: three patients, with frontal lesions, and one with a left occipital lesion, made many more errors than did the normal controls; while a patient with a right occipital lobectomy and one with a left parietotemporal lesion performed normally in this respect. Finally Halstead (1947) found that, of his group of ‘indicators” of cerebral damage, a similar test (No. 2) not only differentiated reliably the patients with cerebral lesions from the normal controls, but also gave a significantly higher error score with cases of frontal lesion.

Goldstein and Scheerer (1941) included Weigl's test in their experimental study of abstract and concrete behaviour; and Trist and Trist (1943) and Brody (1943) noted impairment on this test in cases of general paralysis and the presenile dementias.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 98 , Issue 411 , April 1952 , pp. 299 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1952 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brody, M. B., Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1943, 36, 249.Google Scholar
Frazier, C. H., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., Chicago, 1936, 35, 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, K., Language and Language Disturbances, 1948. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Idem and Scheerer, M., Psychol. Mon., 1941, No. 239.Google Scholar
Halstead, W. C., Amer. J. Psychtat., 1940, 96, 1262.Google Scholar
Idem, Brain and Intelligence, 1947. Univ. Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Idem and Settlage, P. H., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., Chicago, 1943, 49, 489.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O., J. gen. Psychol., 1939, 21, 73.Google Scholar
Idem, ibid., 1941, 25, 257.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G., Brit. med. J., 1937, ii, 199.Google Scholar
Kolodny, A., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., Chicago, 1929, 21, 1107.Google Scholar
Kubitschek, P. E., ibid., 1928, 20, 559.Google Scholar
McFie, J., Piercy, M. F., and Zangwill, O. L., Brain, 1950. 73, 167.Google Scholar
Rylander, G., Acta Psychiat. Neurol., 1939, Suppl. No. 20.Google Scholar
Schiller, F., J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 1947, 10, 183.Google Scholar
Trist, E. L., and Trist, V., Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1943, 36, 243.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D., The Measurement of Adult Intelligence, 3rd ed., 1944. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Weigl, E., Z. Psychol., 1927, 103, 1 (transl. in J. abn. soc. Psychol., 1941, 36, 3).Google Scholar
Zangwill, O. L., Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1943, 36, 576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.