Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:32:38.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Patients' Attitudes to Leucotomy and its Effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

E. Stengel*
Affiliation:
University of London

Extract

It is perhaps not surprising that there have been no studies on the leucotomized patients' attitudes to the operation and its effects. There has been no practical reason for giving that problem special attention. Leucotomized patients have not spontaneously voiced complaints about the operation, even when the result was unsatisfactory. It seems that their apparent silence has been taken so much for granted that psychiatrists have failed to realize that it is an astonishing phenomenon. Here is a group of patients who have been subjected to an operation of which the pros and cons have been widely discussed in public. Many have left hospital free from symptoms but socially handicapped by the side-effects of the operation. Yet there has been, as far as this writer is aware, no instance of litigation in connection with the surgical treatment of mental illness. Part of the explanation for what seems to be a collective indifference to, if not general approval of, the operation and its effects may be found in the type of mental disorder for which this treatment has been most frequently applied: among the patients thus treated there have been many schizophrenics who even after the operation remained out of touch with reality, but that explanation does not apply to the numerous patients who were operated on for affective illnesses and neuroses.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1952 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

This Journal, 86, 1.Google Scholar

This Journal, 96, 633.Google Scholar

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.