Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-fxdwj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-10T16:28:33.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Ethyl Alcohol and Acetaldehyde on Maze Behaviour and Motor Co-Ordination in Rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

R. K. Carpenter  and
L. D. MacLeod
R. K. Carpenter
Affiliation:
Burden Neurological Institute, Stapleton, Bristol
L. D. MacLeod
Affiliation:
Burden Neurological Institute, Stapleton, Bristol
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The study of moderate degrees of alcoholic intoxication in such an animal as the rat demands methods of assessment of the state of the animals, which is a requirement not easy to provide. So far as the more complex integrated activity of the central nervous system is concerned, the use of a suitable maze affords some information of an objective kind. The book by Warden and others (1935) gives much information about construction and operation of mazes. Methods of recording based on projection by a lens (Yerkes and Kellog 1914; Watson, 1914) and the use of electrical contacts (Tolman and Jeffress 1925; Heron, 1933) have been described for rat mazes, while Miles (1928) has suggested the use of blotting-paper in conjunction with an ink writer to show relative speeds within a maze.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 98 , Issue 410 , January 1952 , pp. 167 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1952 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carr, H. E., J. Animal Behav., 1917, 7, 259, 277, 295.Google Scholar
Dewan, J. G., Amer. J. Psychiatry, 1943, 99, 565.Google Scholar
Eggleton, M. G., J. Physiol., 1940, 98, 239.Google Scholar
Ibid., 1941, 101, 172.Google Scholar
Heron, W. T., J. Comp. Psychol., 1933, 16, 144.Google Scholar
Hald, J., and Jacobsen, E., Lancet, 1948, 255, 1001.Google Scholar
Lundsgaard, E., C.R. Lab. Carlsberg, Ser. Chim., 1937, 22, 333.Google Scholar
MacLeod, L. D., Brit. J. Addict., 1948, 45, 112.Google Scholar
Quart. J. Stud. Alcohol., 1950, 11, 385.Google Scholar
Miles, W., J. Gen. Psychol., 1928, 1, 600.Google Scholar
Miller, N. E., and Miles, W. R., J. Comp. Psychol., 1936, 21, 179.Google Scholar
Newman, H., and Abramson, M., Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 1941, 48, 509.Google Scholar
Racker, E., J. Biol. Chem., 1949, 177, 883.Google Scholar
Stotz, E., ibid., 1943, 148, 585.Google Scholar
Idem , Westerfeld, W. W., and Berg, R. C., ibid., 1943, 152, 41.Google Scholar
Tolman, E. C., and Jeffress, L. A., J. Comp. Psychol., 1925, 5, 455.Google Scholar
Varner, W. B., Psychol. Bull., 1933, 30, 616.Google Scholar
Warden, , Jenkins, and Warner, , Comparative Psychology : Principles and Methods, 1935. New York : Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Watson, J. B., J. Animal Behav., 1914, 4, 56.Google Scholar
Yerkes, R. M., and Kellog, C. E., ibid., 1914, 4, 50.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.