Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tpknm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T23:57:19.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Criticisms of Factor Analysis with Suggestions for Alternative Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Monica A. Creasy
Monica A. Creasy*
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Bedford College, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is well known that a factor analysis may be carried out in various ways; the subjective elements involved make it by no means clear that two people beginning with the same data will arrive at the same conclusions. Furthermore, not enough attention has been paid to the confirmation of factors revealed in one analysis by repetition of the tests on another sample from a similar or different population.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 105 , Issue 440 , July 1959 , pp. 755 - 761
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1959 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bartlett, M. S., “Tests of significance in factor analysis”, Brit. J. Psychol., Statist. Sect., 1950, 3, 77–85.Google Scholar
Burt, C., The Factors of the Mind, 1940. University of London Press.Google Scholar
Creasy, Monica A., “Analysis of variance as an alternative to factor analysis”, J. Roy. Statist. Soc., 1957, B, 19, 318–325.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., Dimensions of Personality, 1947. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Idem , The Psychology of Politics, 1954. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A., Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 1948. London: Oliver and Boyd. 10th edition.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P., “When not to factor-analyse”, Psychol. Bull., 1952, 49, 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildebrand, H. P., “A factorial study of introversion-extraversion”, Brit. J. Psychol., 1958, 49, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, , William, , Pragmatism, 1907. New York: Longmans Green.Google Scholar
Lawley, D. N., “Estimation in factor analysis under various initial assumptions”, Brit. J. Statist. Psych., 1958, 11, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, , Babington, B., “Evaluation of factor analysis from the point of view of a psychologist”, J. Roy. Statist. Soc., 1950, B, 12, 73–85.Google Scholar
Storms, L. H., “Discrepancies between factor analysis and multivariate discrimination among groups as applied to personality theory”, J. Ment. Sci., 1958, 104, 713–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, G. H., The Factorial Analysis of Human Ability, 1950. London: University Press. 5th edition.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L., Multiple Factor Analysis, 1947. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.