Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:34:38.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Concept of Responsibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

J. E. MacDonald
J. E. MacDonald*
Affiliation:
Runwell Hospital, near Wickford, Essex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“No man is an iland, intire of itselfe; every man is a peece of the Continent, a part of the Maine; if a Clod bee washed away by the Sea, Europe is the lesse, as well as if a Promontorie were, as well as if a Mannor of thy friends or of thine owne were: any mans death diminishes me, because I am involved in Mankinde. And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.”—John Donne.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 101 , Issue 424 , July 1955 , pp. 704 - 717
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1955 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergmann, G., “Psychoanalysis and Experimental Psychology” in Psychological Theory 1951, Marx, M. H., ed. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Boring, E. G., The Physical Dimensions of Consciousness; 1933. New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
Buckman, C., “Criminal Responsibility”, J. Crim. Law, 1952, 43, 335.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. A., “Is Tree Will’ a Pseudo-Problem?”, Mind, 1951, 60, 441–465.Google Scholar
Cole, L. E., General Psychology, 1939. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Idem , Human Behaviour, 1953. New York: World Book Co.Google Scholar
Craik, K. J. W., The Nature of Explanation, 1943. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drever, J., “Philosophy and Psychology”, Universities Quarterly, 1949, 4, 126–130.Google Scholar
East, N., Society and the Criminal, 1949. H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ellis, W., The Idea of the Soul in Western Philosophy arid Science, 1940. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Frank, A., “Criminal Responsibility”, J. Crim. Law, 1952, 43, 336–338.Google Scholar
Henderson, D. K., “Psychopathic Constitution and Criminal Behaviour”, in Mental Abnormality and Crime, 1944, Radzinowicz, L. and Turner, J. W. C. eds. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Henderson, D. K., and Gillespie, R. D., Textbook of Psychiatry, 1950. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jowrrr, Rt. Hon. Earl, “The Twenty-Eighth Maudsley Lecture: Medicine and the Law”, J. Ment. Sci., 1954, 100, 351–359.Google Scholar
Karpman, B., “Criminality, Insanity and the Law”, J. Crim. Law, 1949, 39, 584–605.Google Scholar
Laslett, P., ed., The Physical Basis of Mind, 1950. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lowrey, L. G., “Psychic Determinism and Responsibility”, Psychiatric Quarterly, 1953, 27, 543–562.Google Scholar
MacNiven, A., “Psychoses and Criminal Responsibility”, in Mental Abnormality and Crime, 1944, Radzinowicz, L. and Turner, J. W. C. eds. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Maier, N. R. F., Frustration, 1949. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mayer-Gross, W., Slater, E., and Roth, M., Clinical Psychiatry, 1954. London: Cassell and Co.Google Scholar
Radzinowicz, L., and Turner, J. W. C., eds., Mental Abnormality and Crime, 1944. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Rockwell, F. V., “Nosology and the Law”, in Current Problems in Psychiatric Diagnosis, 1953, Hoch, P. H. and Zubin, J., eds. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Rudolf, G. de M., “Reaction to Military Life and Criminal Behaviour”, in Mental Abnormality and Crime, 1944, Radzinowicz, L. and Turner, J. W. C. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Ryle, G., The Concept of Mind, 1949. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Scott, G. M., “Alcoholism and Criminal Behaviour”, in Mental Abnormality and Crime, 1944, Radzinowicz, L. and Turner, J. W. C. eds. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Sinclair, A., The Conditions of Knowing, 1951. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Slater, E., “The M'Naghten Rules and Modern Concepts of Criminal Responsibility”, Brit. med. J., 25.9.1954, No. 4890, 713–718.Google Scholar
Smith, P. H. N., “Determinists and Libertarians”, Mind, 1954, 63, 317–337.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S., “Psychology and the Science of Sciences”, in Psychological Theory, 1951, Marx, M. H., ed. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Strauss, E. B., “Moral Responsibility and the Law”, Proc. Roy Soc. Med., 1954, 47, 41–47.Google Scholar
Tappan, P. W., “Medico-Legal Concepts of Criminal Insanity”, J. Crim. Law, 1952, 43, 333–334.Google Scholar
Tolman, E. C., Purposive Behaviour in Animals and Men, 1932. New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
Wertham, F., The Show of Violence, 1949. London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
Wienpahl, P. D., “Concerning Moral Responsibility”, Analysis, 1953, 13, 127–135.Google Scholar
Wingersky, M. F., “Report on the Royal Commission on Capital Punishment (1949–1953): A Review”, J. Crim. Law, 1954, 44, 695–715.Google Scholar
Woodworth, R. S., Psychology: A Study of Mental Life, 1948. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.