Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:59:11.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Behaviour Patterns in Mental Disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

A. B. Monro*
Affiliation:
Long Grove Hospital, Epsom, Surrey

Extract

In psychiatry, generalization is a process which requires careful handling. It must be firmly rooted in everyday experience of the practical empiricism which gets results, and must be free, as far as possible, from the numerous fallacies which have brought “armchair” philosophizing into disrepute. These are formidable requirements, but fortunately one way of meeting them lies ready to hand. There are doubtless many others apparent to more fertile minds, but the one with which this paper deals rests on the fact that a patient who has been successfully treated by a psychiatrist behaves, when well again, in a different manner from that which he displayed when ill. He is cheerful, not depressed, relaxed, instead of being tense; realistic and socially enterprising as opposed to being autistic. If the term “Behaviour” is used in a sufficiently wide sense, it can cover the great majority of psychiatric phenomena without losing its cardinal virtue for the present purpose, namely that behaviour can be observed and its manifestations measured with considerable accuracy. The products of observation can be handled statistically, thereby avoiding armchair theorizing. Admittedly the interpretation of statistically derived findings presents some difficulty, but this is not insuperable. It is usually easier than the process of generalizing from observed data without the benefit of statistical pre-digestion.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1956 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allport, G. W., Personality: A Psychological Interpretation, 1937. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
Ash, P., “The Reliability of Psychiatric Diagnosis”, J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 1949, 44, 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, F., “An Ego-Strength Scale which Predicts Response to Psychotherapy”, J. Consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, C. L., The Factors of the Mind, 1940. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Bychowski, G., “Therapy of the Weak Ego”, Amer. J. Psychother., 1950, 4, 407.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B., The Description and Measurement of Personality, 1946. London: George G. Harrap and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Idem , A Guide to Mental Testing, 1953. London: University of London Press. 3rd ed. Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., The Dimensions of Personality, 1947. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, Ltd.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., The Scientific Study of Personality, 1952. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, Ltd.Google Scholar
Kretschmer, E., Körperbau und Charakter, 1921. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Monro, A. B., A Study of the Correlation Clusters Obtained with a Sample Population of 200 Mentally Disordered Patients, Ph.D. Thesis, 1953. University of Edinburgh Library.Google Scholar
Idem , “A Rating Scale Developed for Use in Clinical Psychiatric Investigations”, J. Ment. Sci., 1954, 100, 657.Google Scholar
Idem , “Psychiatric Types: A Q-Technique Study of 200 Patients”, J. Ment. Sci., 1955, 101, 330.Google Scholar
Stephenson, W., “Some Observations on Q Technique”, Psychol. Bull., 1952, 49, 43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.