Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:39:13.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tribological Properties of Dental Enamel Before and After Orthodontic Bracket Bonding-Debonding by Nano-Scratch Test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2017

A. Karimzadeh ,
M. R. Ayatollahi  and
T. Hosseinzadeh Nik
A. Karimzadeh*
Affiliation:
Fatigue and Fracture Lab Center of Excellence in Experimental Solid Mechanics and Dynamics School of Mechanical Engineering Iran University of Science and TechnologyTehran, Iran
M. R. Ayatollahi
Affiliation:
Dental Research Center Dentistry Research Institute Tehran University of Medical SciencesTehran, Iran
T. Hosseinzadeh Nik
Affiliation:
Department of Orthodontics Faculty of Dentistry Tehran University of Medical SciencesTehran, Iran
*
*Corresponding author ([email protected])
Get access

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of bracket bonding-debonding on the tribological properties of human tooth enamel, when two different adhesives are applied. The nano-scratch experiment was performed on the enamel at untreated and under the bracket regions to obtain wear resistance, scratch hardness and friction coefficient. The results indicated that the tribological properties of the enamel vary significantly after bracket bonding-debonding. However, no significant difference exists between the effects of bracket bonding by the nano-composite and the composite adhesives on the tribological properties. Therefore, considering the mechanical and physical properties of the nano-composite adhesive, its bond strength for orthodontic bracket bonding and the influences on the enamel after removing the bracket, the use of nano-composite adhesive is suitable for orthodontic treatments.

Keywords

Wear-resistantFrictionScratch hardnessPolymer composite
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 279 - 287
Copyright
© The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Burnett, S. E., Irish, J. D. and Fong, M. R., Wear's the Problem? Examining the Effect of Dental Wear on Studies of Crown Morphology In: Scott GR, Irish JD, Editors, Anthropological Perspectives on Tooth Morphology, Cambridge Studies in Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology 21, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 535–554 (2013).Google Scholar
Roy, S. and Basu, B., “Mechanical and Tribological Characterization of Human Tooth,” Materials Characterization, 59, pp. 747–756 (2008).Google Scholar
Meireles, A. B. et al., “Enamel Wear Characterization Based on a Skewness and Kurtosis Surface Roughness Evaluation,” Biotribology, 1–2, pp. 35–41 (2015).Google Scholar
Ayatollahi, M. R. and Karimzadeh, A., “Nano-Indentation Measurement of Fracture Toughness of Dental Enamel,” International Journal of Fracture, 183, pp. 113–118 (2013).Google Scholar
Faria-Júnior, É. M. et al., “In-Vivo Evaluation of the Surface Roughness and Morphology of Enamel after Bracket Removal and Polishing by Different Techniques,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 147, pp. 324–329 (2015).Google Scholar
Panos, P. G., Tarawneh, F. M. and Athanasiou, A. E., “Occlusal Wear Following Orthodontic Treatment Assessed by 3D CT Scanning,” Orthodontics: the Art and Practice of Dentofacial Enhancement, 12, pp. 122–129 (2011).Google Scholar
Ryf, S. et al., “Enamel Loss and Adhesive Remnants Following Bracket Removal and Various Clean-Up Procedures in Vitro,” European Journal of Orthodontics, 34, pp. 25–32 (2012).Google Scholar
Ahrari, F., Akbari, M., Akbari, J. and Dabiri, G., “Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets and Various Clean-Up Techniques,” Journal of Dentistry, 10, pp. 82–93 (2013).Google Scholar
Hosseinzadeh-Nik, T., Karimzadeh, A. and Ayatollahi, M. R., “Bond Strength of a Nano-Composite Used for Bonding Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets,” Materials & Design, 51, pp. 902–906 (2013).Google Scholar
Uysal, T., Yagci, A., Uysal, B. and Akdogan, G., “Are Nano-Composite and Nano-Ionomers Suitable for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding?,” European Journal of Orthodontics, 32, pp. 78–82 (2010).Google Scholar
Karimzadeh, A., Ayatollahi, M. R. and Hosseinzadeh-Nik, T., “Effects of a Nano-Composite Adhesive on Mechanical Properties of Tooth Enamel after Removing Orthodontics Bracket - An Experimental Study Using Nano-Indentation Test,” Experimental Mechanics, 55, pp. 1769–1777 (2015).Google Scholar
Kumar, B. V. M., Basu, B., Murthy, V. S. R. and Gupta, M., “The Role of Tribochemistry on Fretting Wear of Mg-SiC Particulate Composites,” Composites Part A: Apply Science and Manufacturing, 36, pp. 13–23 (2005).Google Scholar
Sinha, S. K. and Briscoe, B. J., Polymer Tribology, Imperial College Press, London, pp. 110–114 (2009).Google Scholar
Wredenberg, F. and Larsson, P.-L., “On the Numerics and Correlation of Scratch Testing,” Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures, 2, pp. 573–594 (2007).Google Scholar
Bellemare, S. C., Dao, M. and Suresh, S., “Effects of Mechanical Properties and Surface Friction on Elas-to-Plastic Sliding Contact,” Mechanics of Materials, 40, pp. 206–219 (2008).Google Scholar
Ayatollahi, M. R., Doagou-Rad, S. and Shadlou, S., “Nano-/Microscale Investigation of Tribological and Mechanical Properties of Epoxy/MWNT Nanocomposites,” Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 297, pp. 689–701 (2012).Google Scholar
Iijima, M. et al., “Effect of Mechanical Properties of Fillers on the Grindability of Composite Resin Adhesives,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 138, pp. 420–426 (2010).Google Scholar
Tuncer, S. et al., “The Effect of a Modeling Resin and Thermocycling on the Surface Hardness, Roughness, and Color of Different Resin Composites,” Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 25, pp. 404–419 (2013).Google Scholar
Ren, Y.-F., Feng, L., Serban, D. and Malmstrom, H. S., “Effects of Common Beverage Colorants on Color Stability of Dental Composite Resins: The Utility of a Thermocycling Stain Challenge Model in Vitro,” Journal of Dentistry, 40, pp. 48–56 (2012).Google Scholar
Gale, M. S. and Darvell, B. W., “Thermal Cycling Procedures for Laboratory Testing of Dental Restorations,” Journal of Dentistry, 27, pp. 89–99 (1999).Google Scholar
Sinha, S. K., Song, T., Wan, X. and Tong, Y., “Scratch and Normal Hardness Characteristics of Polyamide 6/Nano-Clay Composite,” Wear, 266, pp. 814–821 (2009).Google Scholar
Cuy, J. L. et al., “Nanoindentation Mapping of the Mechanical Properties of Human Molar Tooth Enamel,” Archives of Oral Biology, 47, pp. 281–291 (2002).Google Scholar
Williams, J. A., “Analytical Models of Scratch Hardness,” Tribology International, 29, pp. 675 (1996).Google Scholar
Moore, D. F., The Friction and Lubrication of Elastomers: International Series of Monographs on Materials Science and Technology, Pergamon Press, Oxford, p. 288 (1972).Google Scholar
Wredenberg, F. and Larsson, P.-L., “Scratch Testing of Metals and Polymers: Experiments and Numerics,” Wear, 266, pp. 76–83 (2009).Google Scholar
Zhu, P.-Z., Hu, Y.-Z., Ma, T.-B. and Wang, H., “Molecular Dynamics Study on Friction Due to Ploughing and Adhesion in Nanometric Scratching Process,” Tribology Letters, 41, pp. 41–46 (2011).Google Scholar
Johnson, K. L., “The Correlation of Indentation Experiments,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 18, pp. 115–126 (1970).Google Scholar
Poon, B., Rittel, D. and Ravichandran, G., “An Analysis of Nnanoindentation in Elasto-Plastic Solids,” International Journal of Solids and Structurs, 45, pp. 6399–6415 (2008).Google Scholar
Oliver, W. C. and Pharr, G. M., “Measurement of Hardness and Elastic Modulus by Instrumented Indentation: Advances in Understanding and Refinements to Methodology,” Journal of Materials Research, 19, pp. 3–20 (2004).Google Scholar
Karimzadeh, A., Ayatollahi, M. R. and Hosseinzadeh-Nik, T., “Effects of a Nano-Composite Adhesive on Mechanical Properties of Tooth Enamel after Removing Orthodontics Bracket – an Experimental Study Using Nano-Indentation Test,” Experimental Mechanics, 55, pp. 1769–1777 (2015).Google Scholar
Lijima, M. et al., “Effect of Bracket Bonding on Nanomechanical Properties of Enamel,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 138, pp. 735–740 (2010).Google Scholar
Swallowe, G. M., Mechanical Properties and Testing of Polymers, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 113–122 (1999).Google Scholar
Briscoe, B. J., Evans, P. D., Biswas, S. K. and Sinha, S. K., “The Hardness of Poly (Methylmethacrylate),” Tribology International, 29, pp. 93–104 (1996).Google Scholar
Briscoe, B. J., Evans, P. D., Pelillo, E. and Sinha, S. K., “Scratching Maps for Polymers,” Wear, 200, pp. 137–147 (1996).Google Scholar
Sinha, S. K., Song, T., Wan, X. and Tong, Y., “Scratch and Normal Hardness Characteristics of Polyamide 6/Nano-Clay Composite,” Wear, 266, pp. 814–821 (2009).Google Scholar
Bard, R., “Analysis of the Scratch Test for Cohesive-Frictional Materials,” M.S. Thesis, Deptartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, U.S.A. (2010).Google Scholar
Karimzadeh, A., Ayatollahi, M. R. and Shirazi, H. A., “Mechanical Properties of a Dental Nano-Composite in Moist Media Determined by Nano-Scale Measurement,” International Journal of Materials, Mechanics and Manufacturing, 2, pp. 67–72 (2014).Google Scholar
Ayatollahi, M. R. et al., “Effects of Temperature Change and Beverage on Mechanical and Tribological Properties of Dental Restorative Composites,” Materials Science and Engineering: C, 54, pp. 69–75 (2015).Google Scholar
Askikfgajer, V., Hainety, F. S. and Hainety, A. S., Filtek™ Z350 XT, Universal Restorative System, 3M ESPE (2002).Google Scholar