Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:38:06.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Realization of Resonance of a Diaphragm at Any Desired Frequency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2015

Y. Zhang*
Affiliation:
Lab of Aerodynamics and AcousticsZhejiang Institute of Research and InnovationThe University of Hong KongHong Kong, China Department of Mechanical EngineeringThe University of Hong KongHong Kong, China
L. Huang
Affiliation:
Shenzhen Institute of Research and InnovationThe University of Hong KongHong Kong, China
*
*Corresponding author ([email protected])
Get access

Abstract

In noise control, the reactance of a mechanical system needs to be minimized while the resistance is chosen suitably. This work illustrates the possibility of and the ease at which such design tasks may be accomplished by utilizing strong electromechanical coupling. Moving-coil loudspeaker is chosen as the vehicle of illustration and it is considered as a simple spring-mass system when operated below its first diaphragm mode. It is shown that the system mechanical property may be tuned easily by a simple R-LC circuit. In addition to the assigned resonance frequency, there can be a maximum of two other resonances. It is argued that the ability to tune the system mechanical resonance to any frequency, such as the ones at very low frequencies, can be very useful for noise and vibration control applications.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Neise, W., “Noise Reduction in Centrifugal Fans: A Literature Survey,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 45, pp. 375403 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Heckl, M., “Analysis and Control of an Unstable Mode in a Combustor with Tunable End Condition,” International Journal of Spray and Combustion Dynamics, 5, pp. 243272 (2013).Google Scholar
3. de Bedout, J. M., Franchek, M. A., Bernhard, R. J. and Mongeau, L., “Adaptive-Passive Noise Control with Self-Tuning Helmholtz Resonators,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 202, pp. 109123 (1997).Google Scholar
4. Little, E., Kashani, A. R., Kohler, J. and Morrison, F., “Tuning of an Electrorheological Fluid-Based Intelligent Helmholtz Resonator as Applied to Hydraulic Engine Mounts,” ASME DSC Transportation Systems, p. 54 (1994)Google Scholar
5. Hunt, F. V., Electroacoustics: The Analysis of Transduction, and Its Historical Background, Acoustical Society of America, New York, U.S.A. pp. 92102 (1982).Google Scholar
6. Forward, R. L., “Electronic Damping of Vibrations in Optical Structures,” Apply Optics, 18, pp. 690697 (1979).Google Scholar
7. Swigert, C. J. and Forward, R. L., “Electronic Damping of Orthogonal Bending Modes in a Cylindrical Mast-Theory,” Journal of Spacecraft Rockets, 18, pp. 510 (1981).Google Scholar
8. Hagood, N. W. and von Flotow, A., “Damping of Structural Vibrations with Piezoelectric Materials and Passive Electrical Networks,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 146, pp. 243268 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Date, M., Kutani, M. and Sakai, S., “Electrically Controlled Elasticity Utilizing Piezoelectric Coupling,” Journal of Applied Physics, 87, pp. 863868 (2000).Google Scholar
10. Liu, F., “A Tunable Electromechanical Helmholtz Resonator,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Florida, U.S.A. (2007).Google Scholar
11. Fleming, A. J., Niederberger, D., Moheimani, S. O. R. and Morari, M., “Control of Resonant Acoustic Sound Fields by Electrical Shunting of a Loudspeaker,” IEEE Transaction on Control System Technology, 15, pp. 689703 (2007).Google Scholar
12. Pietrzko, S. and Mao, Q., “Noise Reduction in a Duct Using Passive/Semiactive Shunt Loudspeakers,” 16th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Poland (2009).Google Scholar
13. Lissek, H., Boulandet, R. and Romain, F., “Electroacoustic Absorbers: Bridging the Gap Between Shunt Loudspeakers and Active Sound Absorption,” Journal of Acoustics Society of America, 129, pp. 29682978 (2011).Google Scholar
14. Cheung, S. M., “Electrical Control of Acoustics Impedance,” M.Phil Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R. (2010).Google Scholar
15. Zhang, Y., Chan, Y. J. and Huang, L., “Thin Broadband Noise Absorption Through Acoustic Reactance Control by Electro-Mechanical Coupling Without Sensor,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135, pp. 27382745 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Eargle, J., Loudspeaker Handbook, 2nd Edition, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, U.S.A, pp. 163 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Horowitz, P., Hill, W. and Hayes, T. C., The Art of Electronics. 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, Boston, U.S.A. p. 266 (1989).Google Scholar
18. Zhang, Y., “Dynamic Mass Modification by Electric Circuits,” M.Phil Thesis, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R. (2012).Google Scholar
19. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 10534-2: Acoustics, Determination of Sound Absorption Coefficient and Impedance in Impedance Tubes, Part 2: Transfer-Function Method, Switzerland: ISO (1998).Google Scholar
20. Chung, J. Y. and Blaser, D. A., “Transfer Function Method of Measuring In-Duct Acoustic Properties. I-Theory, II-Experiment,” Journal of Acoustics Society of American, 68, pp. 907921 (1980).Google Scholar