Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:29:47.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical Study of Surface Tension Effect on the Hydrodynamic Modeling of the Partially Submerged Propeller's Blade Section

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2016

E. Yari  and
H. Ghassemi
E. Yari
Affiliation:
Department of Maritime Engineering AmirKabir University of Technology Tehran, Iran
H. Ghassemi*
Affiliation:
Department of Maritime Engineering AmirKabir University of Technology Tehran, Iran
*
*Corresponding author ([email protected])
Get access

Abstract

This article is presented the surface tension effect on the two-dimensional blade section of the partially submerged propeller (PSP). In this regard, blade is entered to the water that causes to splash the water due to the impact and free surface. Also, because of the blade's angle of attack suction side is vented by air and pressure side is wetted and gripped the water to generate thrust. The Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) method is used in order to predict the hydrodynamic flow from entering to the exit. Present paper is numerically investigated the effect of free surface and surface tension i.e. related to the Weber number. So, many numerical results are presented and discussed that are included volume fraction, ventilation zones, pressure distributions, vertical and horizontal forces at various Weber numbers.

Keywords

Partially submerged propellerSurface tensionVolume fractionPressure and blade forces
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 32 , Issue 5 , October 2016 , pp. 653 - 664
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Shiba, H., Air-Drawing of Marine Propellers, Technical Report 9, Transportation Technical Research Institute, Unyu-Gijutsu Kenkyujo Mejiro, Tokyo, Japan (1953).Google Scholar
2. Hadler, J. and Hecker, R., “Performance of Partially Submerged Propellers,” The 7th ONR Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Rome, Italy (1968).Google Scholar
3. Hecker, R., “Experimental Performance of a Partially Submerged Propeller in Inclined Flow,” Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers (SNAME)- Spring Meeting, New Jersey, U.S.A, (1973).Google Scholar
4. Rains, D. A., “Semi-submerged Propellers for Monohull Displacement Ships,” Propeller ’81 Symposium Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers (SNAME), Virginia Beach, U.S.A. (1981).Google Scholar
5. Rose, J. C. and Kruppa, C. F. L., “Surface Piercing Propellers: Methodical Series Model Test Results,” Proceeding of 1st International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation (Fast’91), Trondheim, Norway (1991).Google Scholar
6. Kruppa, C. F. L., Testing Surface Piercing Propellers, in Hydrodynamics: Computations, Model Tests, and Reality, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 107–113 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Rose, J. C., Kruppa, C. F. L. and Koushan, K., “Surface Piercing Propellers-Propeller/Hull Interaction,” Proceeding of 2nd International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation (Fast’93), Yokohama, Japan (1993).Google Scholar
8. Wang, D., “Water Entry and Exit of a Fully Ventilated Foil,” Journal of Ship Research, 21, pp. 44–68 (1977).Google Scholar
9. Celik, F., Ozden, A. Y. and Bal, S., “Numerical Simulation of the Flow around Two-Dimensional Partially Cavitating Hydrofoils,” Journal of Marine Science and Application, 13, pp. 245–254 (2014).Google Scholar
10. Hsiao, C. T., Ma, J. and Chahine, G. L., “Simulation of Sheet and Tip Vortex Cavitation on a Rotating Propeller Using a Multiscale Two-Phase Flow Model,” 4th International Symposium on Marine Propulsors (SMP ’15), Austin, U.S.A. (2015).Google Scholar
11. Furuya, O., “A Performance Prediction Theory for Partially Submerged Ventilated Propellers,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 151, pp. 311–335 (1985).Google Scholar
12. Wang, D., “Oblique Water Entry and Exit of a Fully Ventilated Foil,” Journal of Ship Research, 23, pp. 43–54 (1979).Google Scholar
13. Rhee, S. H. and Joshi, S., “CFD Validation for a Marine Propeller Using an Unstructured Mesh Based RANS Method,” ASME/JSME 2003 4th Joint Fluids Summer Engineering Conference, Hawaii, U.S.A. (2003).Google Scholar
14. Califano, A. and Steen, S., “Analysis of Different Propeller Ventilation Mechanisms by Means of RANS Simulations,” First International Symposium on Marine Propulsors (SMP’09), Trondheim, Norway (2009).Google Scholar
15. Califano, A. and Steen, S., “Identification of Ventilation Regimes of a Marine Propeller by Means of Dynamic-Loads Analysis,” Ocean Engineering, 38, pp. 1600–1610 (2011).Google Scholar
16. Kozlowska, A. M., et al., “Numerical and Experimental Study of Propeller Ventilation,” First International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Trondheim, Norway (2009).Google Scholar
17. Ji, B., et al., “Numerical Study of Cavitating Turbulent Flow Around Propellers: Relationship of Cavity Volume Evolution and Pressure Fluctuation,” ASME-JSME-KSME 2011 Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, Japan (2011).Google Scholar
18. Koushan, K., Spence, S. J. B. and Hamstad, T., “Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Waves and Ventilation on Thruster Loadings,” 1st International Symposium on Marine Propulsors (SMP’09), Trondheim, Norway (2009).Google Scholar
19. Koushan, K., Spence, S. and Savio, L., “Ventilated Propeller Blade Loadings and Spindle Moment of a Thruster in Calm Water and Waves,” Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Hamburg, Germany (2011).Google Scholar
20. Savio, L. and Steen, S., “Identification and Analysis of Full Scale Ventilation Events,” International Journal of Rotating Machinery, doi: 10.1155/2012/951642 (2012).Google Scholar
21. Ferrando, M., Viviani, M., Crotti, S., Cassella, P. and Caldarella, S., “Influence of Weber Number on Surface Piercing Propellers Model Test Scaling,” Proceeding of 7th International Conference on Hydrodynamics (ICHD), Ischia, Italy (2006).Google Scholar
22. Himei, K., “Numerical Analysis of Unsteady Open Water Characteristics of Surface Piercing Propeller,” 3rd International Symposium on Marine Propulsors (SMP ’13), Tasmania, Australia (2013).Google Scholar
23. Cox, B. D., “Hydrofoil Theory for Vertical Water Entry,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Naval Architecture, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, U.S.A. (1971).Google Scholar
24. Wilcox, D. C., Turbulence Modeling for CFD, 1st Edition, DCW Industries, Lake Arrowhead, U.S.A. (1998).Google Scholar
25. Brackbill, J. U., Kothe, D. B. and Zemach, C., “A Continuum Method for Modeling Surface Tension,” Journal of Computational Physics, 100, pp. 335–354 (1992).Google Scholar