Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:00:46.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Newton's Laws of Motion Based Substantial Aether Theory of the Universal Gravity Force

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2014

T.-W. Lin*
Affiliation:
National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
H. Lin
Affiliation:
General Motors Company, Pontiac, Michigan 48340, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Even though the universal gravity force has been formulated and used for more than three hundred years, the cause of the universal gravity force has not been fully understood. This paper proposes a substantial aether model to derive universal gravity force based on Newton's laws of motion and Bernoulli's equation. The authors suggest that every aether particle has a mass and occupies a volume in space. Every aether particle has translational movement and particle spin movement. The particle spin movement does not produce the universal gravity force. The translational movement is similar to the gas particle moving in the air and produces aether pressure. The difference of aether pressure generates an aether flow velocity. The difference of aether flow velocities creates a pressure difference according to Bernoulli's equation. The summation of aether pressure difference around an object is shown to be the universal gravity force. A detailed derivation of universal gravity force from the proposed substantial aether model is presented in this paper to show the validation of this model.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Newton, I., Philosophia Naturalis Principia Mathematica (the Principia), Royal Society, London (1687).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Taylar, W. B., Kinetic Theories of Gravitation, Annual Report of the Board of Regents, Smithsonian Institution, pp. 205282 (1876).Google Scholar
3. DeMeo, J., “A Dynamic and Substantive Cosmological Ether,Proceedings of the Natural Philosophy Alliance, Arlington, MA, 1(1) (2004).Google Scholar
4.Michelson, A. A. and Morley, E. W., “On the Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous Ether,The American Journal of Science, 34(203), pp. 333345 (1887).Google Scholar
5.Miller, D. C., “The Ether-Drift Experiment and the Determination of the Absolute Motion of the Earth,Reviews of Modern Physics, 5, pp. 203242 (1933).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Bernoulli, J., “Essai D’une Nouvelle Physique Celeste,The Pieces de Prix de l’Academic de Paris, v (1734).Google Scholar
7.LeSage, G. L., “Loi Qui Comprend Toutes Les Attractions Et Repulsions,The Journal des Savants (1764).Google Scholar
8.Waterston, J. J., “On the Physics of Media that Are Composed of Free and PerFectly Elastic Molecules in a State of Motion,Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A, 183, pp. 179 (1892).Google Scholar
9.Herapath, J., Mathematical Physics, Whittaker and Company, London (1847).Google Scholar
10.Seguin, M., The Philosophical Journal of Edinburgh, x, pp. 280282 (1824).Google Scholar
11.Bernoulli, D., “Hydrodynamica,Britannica Online Encyclopedia (1738).Google Scholar
12.Guyot, J., Elements De Physique Generale, Paris (1832).Google Scholar
13.Carrington, H., “Earlier Theories of Gravity,The Monist, 23, pp. 445458 (1913).Google Scholar
14.Avogadro, A., “Essai D’une Maniere De Determiner Les Masses Relatives Des MoleCules Elementaires Des Corps, Et Les Proportions Selon Lesquelles Elles Entrent Dans Ces Combinaisons,Journal De Physique, English translation, 73, pp. 5876 (1811).Google Scholar