Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:56:28.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigation on Propeller Slipstream by Using an Unstructured Rans Solver Based on Overlapping Grids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2017

X. Q. Gong ,
M. S. Ma ,
J. Zhang  and
J. Tang
X. Q. Gong*
Affiliation:
School of AeronauticsNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityXi'an, China
M. S. Ma
Affiliation:
Computational Aerodynamics InstituteChina Aerodynamics Research and Development CenterMianyang, China
J. Zhang
Affiliation:
Computational Aerodynamics InstituteChina Aerodynamics Research and Development CenterMianyang, China
J. Tang
Affiliation:
Computational Aerodynamics InstituteChina Aerodynamics Research and Development CenterMianyang, China
*
*Corresponding author ([email protected])
Get access

Abstract

Based on unstructured hybrid grid and dynamic overlapping grid technique, numerical simulations of Unsteady Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes equations were performed and investigation on isolated propeller aerodynamic characteristics and effects of propeller slipstream on turboprops were undertaken. The computational grid consisted of rotational subzone of propeller and stationary major-zone of aircraft, and walls criterion was used in the automatic hole-cutting procedure. Distance weight interpolation and tri-linear interpolation were developed to transfer information between the rotational and stationary subzones. The boundaries of overlapping grids were optimized for fixed axis rotation. The governing equations were solved by dual-time method and Lower Upper-Symmetric Gauss-Seidel method. The method and grid technique were verified by isolated propeller configuration and the computational results were in well agreement with the experimental data. The grid independence was studied to establish the numerical results. Finally, the flow around a turboprop case was simulated and the influence of propeller slipstream was presented by analyzing the surface pressure contours, profile pressure distribution, vorticity contours and profile streamline. It's indicated that the slipstream accelerates and rotates the free stream flow, changing the local angle of attack, enhancing the downwash effects, affecting the pressure distribution on wing and horizontal tail, as well as increasing the drag coefficient, pitching moment coefficient and the slope of lift coefficient.

Keywords

Unstructured hybrid gridOverlapping gridPropeller slipstreamUnsteady flow simulation
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 89 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hunsaker, D. and Snyder, D., “A Lifting-Line Approach to Estimating Propeller/Wing Interactions,” 24th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, San Francisco, USA (2006).Google Scholar
2. Landahl, M. T. and Stark, V. J. E., “Numerical Lifting -Surface Theory — Problems and Progress,” AIAA Journal, 6, pp. 2049–2060 (1968).Google Scholar
3. Conway, J. T., “Analytical Solutions for The Actuator Disk with Variable Radial Distribution of Load,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 297, pp. 327–355 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Conway, J. T., “Exact Actuator Disk Solutions for Nonuniform Heavy Loading and Slipstream Contraction,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 365, pp. 235–267 (1998).Google Scholar
5. Nam, H. J., Park, Y. M. and Kwon, O. J., “Simulation of Unsteady Rotor-Fuselage Aerodynamic Interaction Using Unstructured Adaptive Meshes,” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 51, pp. 141–149 (2006).Google Scholar
6. Stuermer, A. W., “Unsteady CFD Simulations of Propeller Installation Effects,” 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, California, USA (2006).Google Scholar
7. Roosenboom, E. W. M., Sturmer, A. and Schroder, A., “Advanced Experimental and Numerical Validation and Analysis of Propeller Slipstream Flows,” Journal of Aircraft, 47, pp. 284–291 (2010).Google Scholar
8. Xu, H. Y. and Ye, Z. Y., “Numerical Study of Propeller Slipstream Based on Unstructured Overset Grids,” Journal of Aircraft, 49, pp. 384–389 (2012).Google Scholar
9. Spalart, P. R. and Allmaras, S. R., “A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows,” 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exihibit, Reno, USA (1992).Google Scholar
10. Jameson, A., “Time Dependent Calculations Using Multi-Grid, with Applications to Unsteady Flows Past Airfoils and Wings,” 10th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Honolulu, USA (1991).Google Scholar
11. Yoon, S. and Jameson, A., “Lower-Upper Implicit Schemes with Multiple Grids for the Euler Equations”. AIAA Journal, 26, pp. 1025–1026 (1988).Google Scholar
12. Blazek, J., Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and Applications, First Edition, Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, pp. 305–319 (2001).Google Scholar
13. Chen, J. T., Zhang, Y. B., Zhou, N. CH. and Deng, Y. Q., “Numerical Investigations of the High-Lift Configuration with MFlow Solver,” Journal of Aircraft, 52, pp. 1051-1062 (2015).Google Scholar
14. Gong, X. Q., Chen, J. T., Zhou, N. CH., Zhang, Y. B. and Deng, Y. Q., “The Effects of Turbulence Model Corrections on Drag Prediction of NASA Common Research Model,” 32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Atlanta, USA (2014).Google Scholar
15. David, W. L. et al., “Summary of Data from the Fifth AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop,” 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Aerospace Sciences Meetings, Texas, USA (2013).Google Scholar
16. https://aiaa-dpw.larc.nasa.gov (2016).Google Scholar
17. Roe, P. L., “Approximate Riemann Solvers, Paremeter Vectors, and Difference Schemes,” Journal of Computational Physics, 143, pp. 125–158 (1981).Google Scholar
18. Venkatakrishnan, V., “On the Accuracy of Limiters and Convergence to Steady State Solutions,” 31st Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exihibit, Reno, USA (1993).Google Scholar
19. Bonet, J., “An Alternating Digital Tree (ADT) Algorithm for 3D Geometric Searching and Intersection Problems,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 31, pp. 1–17 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar