Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T03:39:49.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental Study on the Shear Adhesion Strength Between the Ice and Substrate in Icing Wind Tunnel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2017

C. X. Zhu ,
C. L. Zhu ,
W. W. Zhao  and
M. J. Tao
C. X. Zhu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science for National Defense-Advanced Design Technology of Flight VehicleNanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsNanjing, China
C. L. Zhu*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science for National Defense-Advanced Design Technology of Flight VehicleNanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsNanjing, China
W. W. Zhao
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science for National Defense-Advanced Design Technology of Flight VehicleNanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsNanjing, China
M. J. Tao
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science for National Defense-Advanced Design Technology of Flight VehicleNanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsNanjing, China
*
*Corresponding author ([email protected])
Get access

Abstract

The icing wind tunnel can simulate the air flow at a high altitude; such an air flow contains supercooled droplets moving at certain velocities. An integrated experiment method was proposed, and it included the icing test and shear stress measurements in the simulated environment of the icing wind tunnel. The error caused by the change in experimental environments was completely eliminated with this novel method. Thus, there was no discrepancy between the real-time and experimental values of shear stress between the ice and substrate. The experiments of icing and shear stress measurements are carried out by varying the following parameters: icing temperature, mean volume diameter (MVD) of droplets, and surface roughness of the substrate. The results indicate that the shear stress between the ice and the substrate increases with the decrease in temperature provided the temperature is relatively high. When the MVD value is 22 μm, the liquid water content is about 1 g/m3 and surface roughness is 2 μm. Under these conditions, the shear stress reaches its maximum value at a temperature of –15°C. The shear stress is also affected by the MVD values of droplets, and the surface roughness of substrate.

Keywords

Shear stressIcing wind tunnelIntegrated experiment methodMeteorological parameters
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 209 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Li, Q.-Y., Zhu, C.-L. and Bai, T., “De-Icing Experiment and Numerical Simulation of the Electro-Impulse De-Icing System,” Journal of Aerospace Power, DOI:10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2012.02.020 (2013).Google Scholar
2. Palacios, J.-L., Zhu, Y. and Smith, E.-C., “Ultrasonic Shear and Lamb Wave Interface Stress for Helicopter Rotor De-Icing Purposes,” Proceedings of 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Rhode Island, America (2006).Google Scholar
3. Zhu, Y., Palacios, J.-L., Rose, J.-L. and Smith, E.-C., “Numerical Simulation and Experimental Validation of Tailored Wave Guides for Ultrasonic De-Icing on Aluminum Plates,” Proceedings of 51th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Florida, America (2010).Google Scholar
4. Guy, F. and Jean, P., “Ice Adhesion Models to Predict Shear Stress at Shedding,” Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 26, pp. 523–553 (2012).Google Scholar
5. Petrenko, V. F. and Peng, S., “Reduction of Ice Adhesion to Mental by Using Self-Assembling Monolayers,” Canadian Journal of Physics, 81, pp. 387–393 (2003).Google Scholar
6. Scavuzzo, R.-J. and Chu, M.-L., “Structural Properties of Impact Ices Accreted on Aircraft Structures,” NAS 1.26179580: NASA-CR-179580, 87N18121 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Druez, J., Phan, C.-L. and Laforte, J.-L., “The Adhesion of Glaze and Rime on Aluminum Electric Conductors,” Transactions CSME, 5, pp. 215–220 (1979).Google Scholar
8. Jellinek, H.-G., “The Influence of Imperfections on the Strength of Ice,” Journal of Applied Physics, 27, pp. 1198–1209 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Stallbrass, J.-R. and Price, R.-D., “Study on the Adhesion of Ice to Various Materials,” National Research Council, NRC No. 6980 (1963).Google Scholar
10. Meuler, A.-J., Smith, J.-D., Varanasi, K.-K., Mabry, J.-M. and Mckinley, G.-H., “Relationships Between Water Wettability and Ice Adhesion,” Acs Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2, pp. 3100–3110 (2010).Google Scholar
11. Miller, T.-L. and Bond, T. H., “Icing Research Tunnel Test of a Model Helicopter Rotor,” NASA TM-101978 (1989).Google Scholar
12. Reich, A.-D., “Comparison of Rime and Glaze Deformation and Failure Properties,” AIAA, 91, 0446 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Li, H.-S. and Du, X.-Z., “The Constitutive Theory of Damage and Fracture of Ice Materials Frozen Soil,” Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 25, pp. 304–307 (2003).Google Scholar
14. Yue, Q.-J., Zhou, X.-A. and Shen, W., “The Experimental Method of Shear Strength of Glaze Ice,” Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 16, pp. 75–79 (1994).Google Scholar
15. Liu, W.-B., Li, G.-W. and Wang, L.-Y., “Study on Shear Strength and Modulus of Fresh Water Ice by Torsion Test,” Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 39, pp. 31–33 (1999).Google Scholar
16. Anderson, D. et al., “Tests of the Performance of Coatings for Low Ice Adhesion,” A9715374, AIAA, 97, 0303 (1997).Google Scholar
17. Ivan, A.-R. and Petrenko, V.-F., “Physical Mechanisms Responsible for Ice Adhesion,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 101, pp. 6267–6270 (1997).Google Scholar
18. Yin, L., Xia, Q. and Xue, J., “In Situ Investigation of Ice Formation on Surfaces with Representative Wettability,” Applied Surface Science, 256, pp. 6764–6769 (2010).Google Scholar
19. Wang, F., Lv, F. and Liu, Y.-P., “Ice Adhesion on Different Microstructure Super Hydrophobic Aluminum Surface,” Journal of Adhesion Science and Thechology, 27, pp. 58–67 (2013).Google Scholar
20. Haneesh, K., Joseph, C. and Pruitt, B.-L., “Role of Surface Roughness in Hysteresis during Adhesive Elastic Contact. Philosophical Magazine Letters,” 90, pp. 891–902 (2010).Google Scholar