Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:33:03.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental and Numerical Studies on Ballistic Laminates on the Polyethylene and Polypropylene Matrix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2017

P. Mayer ,
D. Pyka ,
K. Jamroziak ,
J. Pach  and
M. Bocian
P. Mayer*
Affiliation:
Wroclaw University of Science and Technology Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Department of Foundry, Polymers and Automation Laboratory of PlasticsWroclaw, Poland
D. Pyka
Affiliation:
Wroclaw University of Science and Technology Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Department of Mechanics, Materials Science and EngineeringWroclaw, Poland
K. Jamroziak
Affiliation:
Wroclaw University of Science and Technology Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Department of Mechanics, Materials Science and EngineeringWroclaw, Poland
J. Pach
Affiliation:
Wroclaw University of Science and Technology Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Department of Foundry, Polymers and Automation Laboratory of PlasticsWroclaw, Poland
M. Bocian
Affiliation:
Wroclaw University of Science and Technology Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Department of Mechanics, Materials Science and EngineeringWroclaw, Poland
*
*Corresponding author ([email protected])
Get access

Abstract

The paper analyzes the issues relating to the applicability of innovative material systems for flexible composite armors. The authors made several samplings of aramid fibers (Kevlar 49) by replacing the epoxy resin base, which is often described in the literature, with the thermoplastic matrix - polyethylene (HDPE) and polypropylene (PP). The samples were fired with .38 Special Full Metal Jacketed (FMJ) ammunition produced by the S&B Company, and then the process of firing was modeled in the ABAQUS program. The advantages and disadvantages of the new material system including the possibility of its use in the construction of hybrid composite armors have been presented on the basis of the results of numerical analyses and ballistic tests.

Keywords

CompositesPolymersBallistic shieldsBallistic simulations
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 187 - 197
Copyright
© The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrate, S., Impact on Composite Structures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998).Google Scholar
Carlucci, D. E. and Jacobson, S. S., Ballistic. Theory and Design of Guns and Ammunition, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, Boca Raton (2008).Google Scholar
Reid, S. R. and Zhou, G. (ed), Impact Behaviour of Fibre-Reinforced Composite Materials and Structures, Woodhead Publishing Limited and CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton (2008).Google Scholar
Rojek, M. et al., “Composite Materials with the Polymeric Matrix Applied to Ballistic Shields,” Archives of Materials Science and Engineering, 63, pp. 26–35 (2013).Google Scholar
Gogineni, S., Gao, X. L., David, N. V. and Zheng, J. Q., “Ballistic Impact of Twaron CT709 Plain Weave Fabrics,” Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 19, pp. 441–452 (2012).Google Scholar
Sapozhnikov, S. B., Kudryavtsev, O. A. and Zhikharev, M. V., “Fragment Ballistic Performance of Homogenous and Hybrid Thermoplastic Composites,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 81, pp. 8–16 (2015).Google Scholar
Hazzard, M. K., Hallett, S., Curtis, P. T., Iannucci, L. and Trask, R. S., “Effect of Fibre Orientation on the Low Velocity Impact Response of Thin Dyneema Composite Laminates,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 100, pp. 35–45 (2016).Google Scholar
Nguyen, L. H. et al., “A Methodology for Hydrocode Analysis of Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Composite under Ballistic Impact,” Composites: Part A, 84, pp. 224–235 (2016).Google Scholar
Wesolowska, M. and Delczyk-Olejniczak, B., “The Fibers in Ballistics-Today and Tomorrow,” Technical Textiles, pp. 41–50 (2011).Google Scholar
Pereira, M. J. and Revilock, D. M., “Ballistic Impact Response of Kevlar 49 and Zylon under Conditions Representing Jet Engine Fan Containment,” Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 22, pp. 240–248 (2009).Google Scholar
Cheeseman, B. A. and Bogetti, T. A., “Ballistic Impact into Fabric and Compliant Composite Laminates,” Composite Structures, 61, pp. 161–173 (2003).Google Scholar
Pandya, K. S., Dharmane, L., Pothnis, J. R., Ravikumar, G. and Naik, N. K., “Stress Wave Attenuation in Composites during Ballistic Impact,” Polymer Testing, 31, pp. 261–26 (2012).Google Scholar
García-Castillo, S. K., Sánchez-Sáez, S. and Barbero, E., “Nondimensional Analysis of Ballistic Impact on Thin Woven Laminate Plates,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 39, pp. 8–15 (2012).Google Scholar
Gellert, E. P., Cimpoeru, S. J. and Woodward, R. L., “A Study of the Effect of Target Thickness on the Ballistic Perforation of Glass-Fibre-Reinforced Plastic Composites,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 24, pp. 445–456 (2000).Google Scholar
Caprino, G., Lopresto, V. and Santoro, D., “Ballistic Impact Behaviour of Stitched Graphite/Epoxy Laminates,” Composites Science and Technology, 67, pp. 325–335 (2007).Google Scholar
Cork, C. R. and Foster, P. W., “The Ballistic Performance of Narrow Fabrics,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 34, pp. 495–508 (2007).Google Scholar
Kedzierski, P., Gieleta, R., Morka, A., Niezgoda, T. and Surma, Z., “Experimental Study of Hybrid Soft Ballistic Structures,” Composite Structures, 153, pp. 204–211 (2016).Google Scholar
Nunes, L. M., Paciornik, S. and D'almeida, J. R. M., “Evaluation of the Damaged Area of Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy-Matrix Composite Materials Submitted to Ballistic Impacts,” Composites Science and Technology, 64, pp. 945–954 (2004).Google Scholar
Boccaccini, A. R., Atiq, S., Boccaccini, D. N., Dlouhy, I. and Kaya, C., “Fracture Behaviour of Mullite Fibre Reinforced-Mullite Matrix Composites under Quasi-Static and Ballistic Impact Loading,” Composites Science and Technology, 65, pp. 325–333 (2005).Google Scholar
Sheikh, A. H., Bull, P. H. and Kepler, J. A., “Behaviour of Multiple Composite Plates Subjected to Ballistic Impact,” Composites Science and Technology, 69, pp. 704–710 (2009).Google Scholar
Hirai, Y., Hamada, H. and Kim, J. K., “Impact Response of Woven Glass-Fabric Composites-I. Effect of Fibre Surface Treatment,” Composites Science and Technology, 58, pp. 91–104 (1998).Google Scholar
Sabet, A. R., Beheshty, M. H. and Rahimi, H., “Experimental Study of Sharp-Tipped Projectile Perforation of GFRP Plates Containing Sand Filler under High Velocity Impact and Quasi-Static Loadings,” Polymer Composites, 30, pp. 1497–1509 (2009).Google Scholar
Cheeseman, B. A. and Bogetti, T. A., “Ballistic Impact into Fabric and Compliant Composite Laminates,” Composite Structures, 6, pp. 161–173 (2003).Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. G., Gamboa, R. A., Flores-Johnson, E. A. and Gonzalez-Chi, P. I., “Ballistic Performance of Thermoplastic Composite Laminates Made from Aramid Woven Fabric and Polypropylene Matrix,” Polymer Testing, 3, pp. 12–519 (2012).Google Scholar
Iremonger, M. J. and Went, A. C., “Ballistic Impact of Fibre Composite Armours by Fragment-Simulating Projectiles,” Composites Part A, 27A, pp. 575–581 (1996).Google Scholar
Gopinath, G., Zheng, J. Q. and Batra, R. C., “Effect of Matrix on Ballistic Performance of Soft Body Armor,” Composite Structures, 94, pp. 2690–2696 (2012).Google Scholar
Gower, H. L., Cronin, D. S. and Plumtree, A., “Ballistic Impact Response of Laminated Composite Panels,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 35, pp. 1000–1008 (2008).Google Scholar
Awoukeng-Goumtcha, A., Taddei, L., Tostain, F. and Roth, S., “Investigations of Impact Biomechanics for Penetrating Ballistic Cases,” Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering, 24, pp. 2331–2339 (2014).Google Scholar
Yang, Y. and Chen, X., “Study of Energy Absorption and Failure Modes of Constituent Layers in Body Armour Panels,” Composites Part B, 98, pp. 250–259 (2016).Google Scholar
Kulkarni, S. G., Gao, X. L., Horner, S. E., Zheng, J. Q. and David, N. V., “Ballistic Helmets - Their Design, Materials, and Performance against Traumatic Brain Injury,” Composite Structures, 101, pp. 313–331 (2013).Google Scholar
Tham, C. Y., Tan, V. B. C. and Lee, H. P., “Ballistic Impact of a KEVLAR Helmet: Experiment and Simulations,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 35, pp. 304–318 (2008).Google Scholar
Sorrentinoa, L., Bellinia, C., Corradoa, A., Polinia, W. and Aricòb, R., “Ballistic Performance Evaluation of Composite Laminates in Kevlar 29,” Procedia Engineering, 88, pp. 255–262 (2015).Google Scholar
Haro, E. E., Akindele, G. O. and Szpunar, J. A., “The Energy Absorption Behavior of Hybrid Composite Laminates Containing Nano-Fillers under Ballistic Impact,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 96, pp. 11–22 (2016).Google Scholar
Balaganesan, G., Velmurugan, R., Srinivasan, M., Gupta, N. K. and Kanny, K., “Energy Absorption and Ballistic Limit of Nanocomposite Laminates Subjected to Impact Loading,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 74, pp. 57–66 (2014).Google Scholar
Caprino, G., Lopresto, V. and Santor, O. D., “Ballistic Impact Behaviour of Stitched Graphite/Epoxy Laminates,” Composites Science and Technology, 67, pp. 325–335 (2007).Google Scholar
Bandaru, A. K., Chavan, V. V., Ahmad, S., Alagirusamy, R. and Bhatnagar, N., “Ballistic Impact Response of Kevlar® Reinforced Thermoplastic Composite Aarmors,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 89, pp. 1–13 (2016).Google Scholar
Bandaru, A. K. and Ahmad, S., “Effect of Projectile Geometry on the Deformation Behavior of Kevlar Composite Armors under Ballistic Impact,” International Journal of Applied Mechanics, 7, 1550039 (2015).Google Scholar
Ben-Dor, G., Dubinsky, A. and Elperin, T., Applied High-Speed Plate Penetration Dynamics, Springer, Berlin (2006).Google Scholar
Bocian, M., Jamroziak, K. and Kosobudzki, M., “Analysis of Material Punching Including a Rotational Speed of the Projectile,” Solid State Phenomena, 220–221, pp. 571–576 (2015).Google Scholar
Rusinski, E., Karlinski, J. and Jamroziak, K., “The Chosen Aspects from Research of Ballistic Shields,” Proceedings of the 22nd DANUBIA-ADRIA Symposium on Experimental Methods in Solid Mechanics DAS, Monticelli Terme-Parma, Italy (2005).Google Scholar
Kedzierski, P., Poplawski, A., Gieleta, R. and Slawinski, G., “Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Fabric Impact behavior,” Composites Engineering Part B, 69, pp. 452–459 (2015).Google Scholar
Pyka, D., Jamroziak, K., Blazejewski, W. and Bocian, M., “Calculations with the Finite Element Method during the Design Ballistic Armour,” Proceedings of the 13th International Scientific Conference, Computer Aided Engineering, Rusinski, E., Pietrusiak, D. (eds), Springer International Publishing AG, pp. 451–459 (2017).Google Scholar
Stanislawek, S., Morka, A. and Niezgoda, T., “Pyramidal Ceramic Armor Ability to Defeat Projectile Threat by Changing its Trajectory,” Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Technica Sciences, 63, pp. 843–849 (2015).Google Scholar
Yahaya, R., Sapuan, S. M., Jawaid, M., Leman, Z. and Zainudin, E. S., “Measurement of Ballistic Impact Properties of Woven Kenaf-Aramid Hybrid Composites,” Measurement, 77, pp. 335–343 (2016).Google Scholar
Lim, C. T., Shim, V. P. W. and Ng, Y. H., “Finite-Element Modeling of the Ballistic Impact of Fabric Armor,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 28, pp. 13–31 (2003).Google Scholar
Malachowski, J., Influence of HE Location on Elastic-Plastic Tube Response under Blast Loading, Shell Structures Theory and Applications, Taylor & Francis Group, London, 2, pp. 179–182 (2010).Google Scholar
Shim, V. P. W., Tan, V. B. C. and Tay, T. E., “Modelling Deformation and Damage Characteristics of Woven Fabric under Small Projectile Impact,” International Journal Impact Engineering, 16, pp. 585–605 (1995).Google Scholar
Panowicz, R. and Janiszewski, J. “Tensile Split Hopkinson Bar Technique: Numerical Analysis of the Problem of Wave Disturbance and Specimen Geometry Selection,” Metrology and Measurement Systems, 23, pp. 425–436 (2016).Google Scholar
Grujicic, M., Arakere, G., Gogulapati, M. and Cheeseman, B. A., “A Numerical Investigation of the Influence of Yarn-Level Finite-Element Model on Energy Absorption by a Flexible-Fabric Armour during Ballistic Impact,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, 222, pp. 259–276 (2008).Google Scholar
Jamroziak, K. et al., Impact Resistance of Ballistic Shields of Personal Protection in Relation to Selected Small Arms Ammunition, an Unpublished Report Part 1, Military Academy of Land Forces, Wroclaw (2005) (in Polish).Google Scholar
Jamroziak, K., An Identification of the Material Properties in the Terminal Ballistic, Wroclaw University of Technology Publishing House, Wroclaw (2013).Google Scholar