Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:32:02.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of Interlaminar Shear Stress by Strain Measurements on Laminate Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2011

C.Y. Lee*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Da-Yeh University, Da-Tsuen, Chang-Hwa, Taiwan 515, R.O.C.
C.C. Huang*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Da-Yeh University, Da-Tsuen, Chang-Hwa, Taiwan 515, R.O.C.
*
*Professor
**Graduate student
Get access

Abstract

For most composite structures, because of the uncertainty in some design variables, it is not possible to predict precisely the stresses during design stage. Therefore, monitoring the structural responses in service becomes crucial for structure with concerns, e.g., the composite panels on an airplane, etc. In this study, the strains at neighboring points of the interested location on surfaces of the laminate, along with the classical laminate theory and the higher-order shear deformation theory, are used to predict the interlaminar shear stresses in the cross-ply laminate. Several numerical examples using the simulated surface strains are employed to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed technique. It is found that the approach using the higher-order shear deformation theory has improved accuracy for the analysis of thick symmetric laminate over the approach using the classical laminate theory.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

l.Reddy, J. N., Mechanics of Laminated Composite Plates—Theory and Analysis, CRC Press (1997).Google Scholar
2.Pagano, N. J., “Exact Solutions for Composite Laminates in Cylindrical Bending,” Journal of Composite Materials, 3, pp. 398411 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Reddy, J. N., “A Simple Higher Order Theory for Laminated Composite Plates,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, 51, pp. 745752 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Rogers, C. A., Barker, D. K. and Jaeger, C. A., “Introduction to Smart Materials and Structures,” in Smart Materials, Structures, and Mathematical Issues, edited by Rogers, C. A. Technomic, Lancaster, pp. 17–28 (1988).Google Scholar
5.Daniel, I. M., Mullineaux, I. L., Ahimaz, F. J. and Liber, T., “The Embedded Strain Gage Technique for Testing Boron/Epoxy,” in Composite Materials: Testing and Design, ASTM STP 497, ASTM, Philadelphia, pp. 257272 (1972).Google Scholar
6.Salzano, T. B., Calder, C. A. and DeHart, D. W., “Embedded Strain-Sensor Development for Composite Smart Structures,” Experimental Mechanics, pp. 225–229 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Lee, C. Y. and Liu, D., “Static and Vibration Analysis of Laminated Composite Beams with Interlaminar Shear Stress Continuity Theory,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1992, 33, pp. 409–424 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Lee, C. Y. and Chen, C. M., “Interlaminar Shear Stress Analysis of Composite Laminate with Layer Reduction Technique,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 39, pp. 847865 (1996).3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar