Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:50:40.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Stacking Sequence on Nonlinear Hydroelastic Behavior of Composite Propeller Blade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2011

H. J. Lin ,
W. M. Lai  and
Y. M. Kuo
H. J. Lin*
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Science and Ocean Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
W. M. Lai*
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Science and Ocean Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
Y. M. Kuo*
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Science and Ocean Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
*
* Professor, corresponding author
** Ph.D. student
*** Post Ph.D. researcher
Get access

Abstract

A coupled structural and fluid flow analysis was performed to assess the hydroelastic behavior of a composite marine propeller. The finite element method and lifting surface theory were applied in the structural and fluid analyses, respectively. A coupled equation derived from the Bernoulli equation and the hydrostatic pressure in terms of the blade deflection and strength of the vortex was solved by Newton-Raphson procedure. A MAU 3–60 propeller was analyzed with different stacking sequences of composite layup. The hydroelastic behaviors of the propeller with balanced and unbalanced stacking sequences were investigated and discussed. The unbalanced Stacking sequences were shown to influence the performance of the composite propeller, especially in the region in which the advanced coefficient is low.

Keywords

CompositesStacking sequencePropeller bladeNonlinear hydroelastic.
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 293 - 298
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Taylor, D. W., The speed and power of ships, Ransdell, Washington (1933).Google Scholar
2.Cohen, J. W., “On Stress Calculations in Helicoidal Shells and Propeller Blades,” Netherlands Research Center, T.N.O. Shipbuilding and Navigation, Delft Report 21S (1955).Google Scholar
3.Conolly, J. E., “Strength of Propeller,“ Trans RINA, 103, pp. 139–204(1974).Google Scholar
4.Genalis, P., “Elastic Strength of Propellers–An Analysis by Matrix Methods,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, USA (1970).Google Scholar
5.Atkinson, P., “On the Choice of Method for the Calculation of Stress in Marine Propeller,” Trans RINA, 110, pp. 447–463 (1968).Google Scholar
6.Ma, J. H., “Stresses in Marine Propellers,” Journal of Ship Research, 18, pp. 252–264 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Sontvedt, T., “Propeller Blade Stresses–Application of Finite Element Methods,” Computers and Structures, 4, pp. 193–204(1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Atkinson, P. and Glover, E. J., “Propeller Hydroelastic Effects,” SNAME on the propeller '88 Symposium, 21, Jersey, NJ (1988).Google Scholar
9.Lin, H. J. and Lin, J. J., “Nonlinear Hydroelastic Behavior of Propellers Using a Finite-Element Method and Lifting Surface Theory,” Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 1, pp. 114–124 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Kerwin, J. E. and Lee, C. S., “Prediction of Steady and Unsteady Marine Propeller Performance by Numerical Lifting-Surface Theory,” Trans SNAME, 86, pp. 218–253 (1978).Google Scholar
11.Haisler, W. E. and Stricklin, J. A., “Development and Evaluation of Solution Procedures for Geometrically Nonlinear Structural Analysis,” American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal, 10, pp. 264–272 (1972).Google Scholar
12.Bathe, K. J. and Ramm, E., “Finite Element Formulations for Large Deformation Dynamic Analysis,” International Journal of Numerical Methods on Engineering, 9, pp. 353–386(1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Chang, T. Y. and Sawamiphakdi, K., “Large Deformation Analysis of Laminated Shell by Finite Element Method,” Computers and Structures, 13, pp. 331–340 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Zienkiewicz, O. C, The Finite Element Method, 4th Ed., McGraw-Hill, London (1991).Google Scholar
15.Bathe, K. J. and Bolourchi, S., “A geometrical and Material Nonlinear Plate and Shell Element,” Computers and Structures, 11, pp. 23–48 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Shirk, M. H., Hertz, T. J. and Weisshaar, T. A., “Aeroelastic Tailoring Theory, Practice and Promise,” Journal of Aircraft, 23, pp. 6–18 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar