Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T10:32:45.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic Crack Propagation in Piezoelectric Materials Subjected to Dynamic Body Forces for Vacuum Boundary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2011

X.-H. Chen ,
C.-C. Ma  and
Y.-S. Ing
X.-H. Chen*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
C.-C. Ma*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
Y.-S. Ing*
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Tamkang University, Tamsui, Taiwan 25137, R.O.C.
*
*Ph.D. candidate
**Professor, corresponding author
***Professor
Get access

Abstract

The problem of a semi-infinite propagating crack in the piezoelectric material subjected to a dynamic anti-plane concentrated body force is investigated in the present study. It is assumed that between the growing crack surfaces there is a permeable vacuum free space, in which the electrostatic potential is nonzero. It is noted that this problem has characteristic lengths and a direct attempt towards solving this problem by transform and Wiener-Hopf techniques [1] is not applicable. This paper proposes a new fundamental solution for propagating crack in the piezoelectric material and the transient response of the propagating crack is determined by superposition of the fundamental solution in the Laplace transform domain. The fundamental solution represents the responses of applying exponentially distributed loadings in the Laplace transform domain on the propagating crack surface. Exact analytical transient solutions for the dynamic stress intensity factor and the dynamic electric displacement intensity factor are obtained by using the Cagniard-de Hoop method [2,3] of Laplace inversion and are expressed in explicit forms. Finally, numerical results based on analytical solutions are calculated and are discussed in detail.

Keywords

Crack propagationPiezoelectric materialSuperpositionDynamic stress intensity factorDynamic electric displacement intensity factor.
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 229 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Noble, B., Method Based on the Wiener-Hopf Technique, Elmsford, New York (1958).Google Scholar
2.Cagnard, L., Reflexion et Refraction des Ondes Seismiques Progressives, McGraw-Hill, New York (1939).Google Scholar
3.de Hoop, A. T., “A Modification of Cagniard's Method for Solving Seismic Pulse Problems,” Appl. Sci. Res. Sect. B, 8, pp. 349–360 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Pohanka, R. C. and Smith, P. L., Recent Advances in Piezoelectric Ceramics, Marcel Dekker, New York (1988).Google Scholar
5.Bleustein, J. L., “A New Surface Wave in Piezoelectric Materials,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 13, pp. 412–413 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Gulyaev, Y. V., “Electro-Acoustic Surface Waves in Solids,” Sov. Phys., JETP 9, pp. 37–38 (1969).Google Scholar
7.Stoneley, R., “Elastic Waves at the Surface of Separation of Two Solids,” Proc. R. Soc., A106, pp. 416–428 (1924).Google Scholar
8.Daros, C. H., “On Modeling Bleustein-Gulyaev Waves in Non-Homogeneous, Transversely Isotropic, Piezoelectric Media via Stress Equations of Motion,” Acta. Mech., 163, pp. 121–126 (2003).Google Scholar
9.Yoffe, E. H., “The Moving Griffith Crack,” Philosophical Magazine, 42, pp. 739–750 (1951).Google Scholar
10.Achenbach, J. D., “Brittle and Ductile Extension of a Finite Crack by a Horizontally Polarized Shear Wave,” Int. J. Eng. Sci., 8, pp. 947–966 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Freund, L. B., “Crack Propagation in an Elastic Solid Subjected to General Loading — I. Constant Rate of Extension,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids., 20, pp. 129–140 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Ma, C. C. and Hou, Y. C., “Theoretical Analysis of the Transient Response for a Stationary In-plane Crack Subjected to Dynamic Impact Loading,” Int. J. Engng Sci., 28, pp. 1321–1329 (1990).Google Scholar
13.Ma, C. C. and Hou, Y. C., “Transient Analysis for Anti-plane Crack Subjected to Dynamic Loadings,” J. Appl. Mech., 58, pp. 703–709 (1991).Google Scholar
14.Li, S. and Mataga, P. A., “Dynamic Crack Propagation in Piezoelectric Materials — Part I. Electrode Solution,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids., 44, pp. 1799–1830 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Li, S. and Mataga, P. A., “Dynamic Crack Propagation in Piezoelectric Materials — Part II. Vacuum Solution,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids., 44, pp. 1831–1866 (1996).Google Scholar
16.Ing, Y. S. and Ma, C. C., “Transient Response of a Finite Crack Subjected to Dynamic Anti-plane Loading,” Int. J. Fracture, 82, pp. 345–362 (1996).Google Scholar
17.Ing, Y. S. and Ma, C. C., “Dynamic Fracture Analysis of a Finite Crack Subjected to an Incident Horizontally Polarized Shear Wave,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 34, pp. 895–910 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Chen, Z. T. and Yu, S. W., “Anti-plane Yoffe Crack Problem in Piezoelectric Materials,” Int. J. Fract., 84, pp. L41–L45 (1997).Google Scholar
19.Kwon, S. M. and Lee, K.Y, “Analysis of Stress and Electric Field in a Rectangular Piezoelectric Body with a Center Crack under Anti-plane Shear Loading,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 37, pp. 4859–4869 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.To, A. C., Li, S. and Glaser, S. D., “On Scattering in Dissimilar Piezoelectric Materials by a Semi-infinite Interfacial Crack,” Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math., 58, pp. 309–331 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Freund, L. B., “The Stress Intensity Factor due to Normal Impact Loading of the Faces of a Crack,” Int. J. Eng. Sci., 12, pp. 179–189 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Ing, Y. S. and Wang, M. J., “Explicit Transient Solutions for a Mode III Crack Subjected to Dynamic Concentrated Loading in a Piezoelectric Material,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 41, pp. 3849–3864 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Tsai, C. H. and Ma, C. C., “Transient Analysis of a Semi-infinite Crack Subjected to Dynamic Concentrated Force,” J. Appl. Mech., 59, pp. 804–811 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Ma, C. C. and Chen, S. K., “Exact Transient Full-field Analysis of an Anti-plane Subsurface Crack Subjected to Dynamic Impact Loading,” J. Appl. Mech., 61, pp. 649–655 (1994).Google Scholar
25.Tsai, C. H. and Ma, C. C., “Transient Analysis of a Propagating In-plane Crack in a Finite Geometry Body Subjected to Static Loadings,” J. Appl. Mech., 64, pp. 620–628 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Tsai, C. H. and Ma, C. C., “Theoretical Transient Analysis of the Interaction Between a Dynamically Propagating In-plane Crack and Traction Free Boundaries,” J. Appl. Mech., 64, pp. 819–827 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Yang, X. H., Dong, L., Chen, C. Y., Wang, C. and Hu, Y. T., “Damage Extension Forces and Piezoelectric Fracture Criteria,” Journal of Mechanics, 20, pp. 277–283 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Ma, C. C. and Chen, S. K., “Exact Transient Analysis of an Anti-plane Semi-infinite Crack Subjected to Dynamic Body Forces,” Wave Motion, 17, pp. 161–171 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar